Abstract
This chapter explores the applicability of a service ecosystem perspective in human-centered service contexts. The notion of service ecosystems springs from the literature on service-dominant logic (S-D logic), which has contributed to the rethinking of service exchange as a value creation processes rather than as production of output. It serves as a framework for studying systems of service systems and is relevant for capturing the complexity of value creation in certain human-centered service contexts. We address this complexity by integrating the service ecosystem perspective with institutional logics theory. This allows for an analysis of how negotiations of different outlooks, values, and beliefs influence the activation of resources across service systems and ultimately the ability to cocreate value. The chapter is based on data from the Norwegian “Introduction Program,” which is a public service offered to newly arrived refugees and immigrants granted asylum. As such, the chapter deals with complex service systems that provide services for users in vulnerable and marginalized positions. In this context, the solutions to problems and areas for improvements cannot be found in the digitalization of service processes. Thus, the chapter brings attention to service areas in which the impact of the digitalization of service processes is limited, or mainly indirect.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aal, K., Di Pietro, L., Edvardsson, B., Renzi, F. M., & Guglielmetti Mugion, R. (2016). Innovation in service ecosystems: An empirical study of the integration of values, brands, service systems and experience rooms. Journal of Service Management, 27(4), 619–651.
Åkesson, M., Skålén, P., Edvardsson, B., & Stålhammar, A. (2016). Value proposition test-driving for service innovation: How frontline employees innovate value propositions. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 26(3), 338–362.
Baron, S., Patterson, A., Maull, R., & Warnaby, G. (2017). Feed people first: A service ecosystem perspective on innovative food waste reduction. Journal of Service Research, 21(1), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670517738372.
Chandler, J. D., & Vargo, S. L. (2011). Contextualization and value-in-context: How context frames exchange. Marketing Theory, 11(1), 35–49.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101.
Djuve, A. B. (2011). Introductory programs for immigrants: Liberalism revisited, or changing ideas of citizenship? Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 1(3), 113–125.
Edvardsson, B., Tronvoll, B., & Gruber, T. (2011). Expanding understanding of service exchange and value co-creation: A social construction approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(2), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0200-y.
Edvardsson, B., Kleinaltenkamp, M., Tronvoll, B., McHugh, P., & Windahl, C. (2014). Institutional logics matter when coordinating resource integration. Marketing Theory, 14(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593114534343.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1999). Strategy as strategic decision making. Sloan Management Review. (Spring 1999), 65–72.
Fitzerwalder, J. (2017). Refugee influx: Repercussions and research agenda for service scholars. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 37, 177–181.
Friedland, R., & Alford, R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In P. J. DiMaggio & W. W. Powell (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Grönroos, C., & Voima, P. (2013). Critical service logic: Making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 133–150.
Jay, J. (2012). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management, 56(1), 137–159.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.
Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. The Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.2307/259349.
Lillegård, M., & Seierstad, A. (2013). Introduksjonsordningen i kommunene: en sammenligning av kommunenes resultater (SSB-rapport 55/2013). Oslo: Statistics Norway.
Lounsbury, M. (2002). Institutional transformation and status mobility: The professionalization of the field of finance. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069295.
Maglio, P. P., & Spohrer, J. (2008). Fundamentals of service science. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 18–20.
Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30(6), 629–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609104803.
Røhnebæk, M., & Eide, T. H. (2016). Samarbeid i og etter introduksjonsprogrammet: drivere, barrierer og mulighetsrom: rapport fra prosjektets første fase (Østlandsforskningsrapport 4/2016). Lillehammer: Østlandsforskning.
Saz-Carranza, A., & Longo, F. (2012). Managing competing institutional logics in public–private joint ventures. Public Management Review, 14(3), 331–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2011.637407.
Siltaloppi, J., Koskela-Huotari, K., & Vargo, S. L. (2016). Institutional complexity as a driver for innovation in service ecosystems. Service Science, 8(3), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.2016.0151.
Skålén, P., Aal, K. A., & Edvardsson, B. (2015). Cocreating the Arab Spring. Journal of Service Research, 18(3), 250–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670514559700.
Skelcher, C., & Smith, S. R. (2015). Theorizing hybridity: Institutional logics, complex organizations, and actor identities: The case of nonprofits. Public Administration, 93(2), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12105.
Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–843. https://doi.org/10.1086/210361.
Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (Vol. 840, pp. 99–128). London: SAGE.
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The Institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tronstad, K. R. (2015). Introduksjonsprogram for flyktninger i norske kommuner: hva betyr organiseringen for overgangen til arbeid og utdanning? (Vol. 2). Oslo: Norsk institutt for by- og regionforskning.
van den Broek, J., Boselie, P., & Paauwe, J. (2014). Multiple institutional logics in health care: ‘Productive ward: Releasing time to care. Public Management Review, 16(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.770059.
Vargo, S. L., & Akaka, A. M. (2009). Service-dominant logic as a foundation for service science: Clarifications. Service Science, 1(1), 32–41.
Vargo, S. L., & Akaka, A. M. (2012). Value cocreation and service systems (re)formation: A service ecosystems view. Service Science, 4(3), 207–217.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: An extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0456-3.
Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., & Akaka, A. M. (2008). On value and value creation: A systems and service logic perspective. European Management Journal, 26, 145–152.
Vargo, S. L., Lusch, R. F., & Akaka, A. M. (2010). Advancing service science with service-dominant logic. In Handbook of service science (pp. 133–156). New York: Springer.
Vargo, S. L., Wieland, H., & Akaka, M. A. (2016). Innovation in service ecosystems. Journal of Serviceology, 1(1), 1–5.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Røhnebæk, M.T., Engen, M., Eide, T.H. (2019). Institutional Logics in Service Ecosystems: An Analysis of Immigration and Social Inclusion. In: Toivonen, M., Saari, E. (eds) Human-Centered Digitalization and Services. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 19. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7725-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7725-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7724-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7725-9
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)