Skip to main content

Institutional Logics in Service Ecosystems: An Analysis of Immigration and Social Inclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Human-Centered Digitalization and Services

Part of the book series: Translational Systems Sciences ((TSS,volume 19))

  • 1608 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores the applicability of a service ecosystem perspective in human-centered service contexts. The notion of service ecosystems springs from the literature on service-dominant logic (S-D logic), which has contributed to the rethinking of service exchange as a value creation processes rather than as production of output. It serves as a framework for studying systems of service systems and is relevant for capturing the complexity of value creation in certain human-centered service contexts. We address this complexity by integrating the service ecosystem perspective with institutional logics theory. This allows for an analysis of how negotiations of different outlooks, values, and beliefs influence the activation of resources across service systems and ultimately the ability to cocreate value. The chapter is based on data from the Norwegian “Introduction Program,” which is a public service offered to newly arrived refugees and immigrants granted asylum. As such, the chapter deals with complex service systems that provide services for users in vulnerable and marginalized positions. In this context, the solutions to problems and areas for improvements cannot be found in the digitalization of service processes. Thus, the chapter brings attention to service areas in which the impact of the digitalization of service processes is limited, or mainly indirect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aal, K., Di Pietro, L., Edvardsson, B., Renzi, F. M., & Guglielmetti Mugion, R. (2016). Innovation in service ecosystems: An empirical study of the integration of values, brands, service systems and experience rooms. Journal of Service Management, 27(4), 619–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Åkesson, M., Skålén, P., Edvardsson, B., & Stålhammar, A. (2016). Value proposition test-driving for service innovation: How frontline employees innovate value propositions. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 26(3), 338–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, S., Patterson, A., Maull, R., & Warnaby, G. (2017). Feed people first: A service ecosystem perspective on innovative food waste reduction. Journal of Service Research, 21(1), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670517738372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, J. D., & Vargo, S. L. (2011). Contextualization and value-in-context: How context frames exchange. Marketing Theory, 11(1), 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djuve, A. B. (2011). Introductory programs for immigrants: Liberalism revisited, or changing ideas of citizenship? Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 1(3), 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edvardsson, B., Tronvoll, B., & Gruber, T. (2011). Expanding understanding of service exchange and value co-creation: A social construction approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(2), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0200-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edvardsson, B., Kleinaltenkamp, M., Tronvoll, B., McHugh, P., & Windahl, C. (2014). Institutional logics matter when coordinating resource integration. Marketing Theory, 14(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593114534343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1999). Strategy as strategic decision making. Sloan Management Review. (Spring 1999), 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzerwalder, J. (2017). Refugee influx: Repercussions and research agenda for service scholars. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 37, 177–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, R., & Alford, R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In P. J. DiMaggio & W. W. Powell (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C., & Voima, P. (2013). Critical service logic: Making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jay, J. (2012). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management, 56(1), 137–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. The Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.2307/259349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillegård, M., & Seierstad, A. (2013). Introduksjonsordningen i kommunene: en sammenligning av kommunenes resultater (SSB-rapport 55/2013). Oslo: Statistics Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, M. (2002). Institutional transformation and status mobility: The professionalization of the field of finance. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maglio, P. P., & Spohrer, J. (2008). Fundamentals of service science. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 18–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30(6), 629–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609104803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Røhnebæk, M., & Eide, T. H. (2016). Samarbeid i og etter introduksjonsprogrammet: drivere, barrierer og mulighetsrom: rapport fra prosjektets første fase (Østlandsforskningsrapport 4/2016). Lillehammer: Østlandsforskning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saz-Carranza, A., & Longo, F. (2012). Managing competing institutional logics in public–private joint ventures. Public Management Review, 14(3), 331–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2011.637407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siltaloppi, J., Koskela-Huotari, K., & Vargo, S. L. (2016). Institutional complexity as a driver for innovation in service ecosystems. Service Science, 8(3), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.2016.0151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skålén, P., Aal, K. A., & Edvardsson, B. (2015). Cocreating the Arab Spring. Journal of Service Research, 18(3), 250–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670514559700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skelcher, C., & Smith, S. R. (2015). Theorizing hybridity: Institutional logics, complex organizations, and actor identities: The case of nonprofits. Public Administration, 93(2), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–843. https://doi.org/10.1086/210361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (Vol. 840, pp. 99–128). London: SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The Institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tronstad, K. R. (2015). Introduksjonsprogram for flyktninger i norske kommuner: hva betyr organiseringen for overgangen til arbeid og utdanning? (Vol. 2). Oslo: Norsk institutt for by- og regionforskning.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van den Broek, J., Boselie, P., & Paauwe, J. (2014). Multiple institutional logics in health care: ‘Productive ward: Releasing time to care. Public Management Review, 16(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.770059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Akaka, A. M. (2009). Service-dominant logic as a foundation for service science: Clarifications. Service Science, 1(1), 32–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Akaka, A. M. (2012). Value cocreation and service systems (re)formation: A service ecosystems view. Service Science, 4(3), 207–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: An extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0456-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., & Akaka, A. M. (2008). On value and value creation: A systems and service logic perspective. European Management Journal, 26, 145–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., Lusch, R. F., & Akaka, A. M. (2010). Advancing service science with service-dominant logic. In Handbook of service science (pp. 133–156). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., Wieland, H., & Akaka, M. A. (2016). Innovation in service ecosystems. Journal of Serviceology, 1(1), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Taivalsaari Røhnebæk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Røhnebæk, M.T., Engen, M., Eide, T.H. (2019). Institutional Logics in Service Ecosystems: An Analysis of Immigration and Social Inclusion. In: Toivonen, M., Saari, E. (eds) Human-Centered Digitalization and Services. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 19. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7725-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics