Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Elderly Care and Digital Services: Toward a Sustainable Sociotechnical Transition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human-Centered Digitalization and Services

Part of the book series: Translational Systems Sciences ((TSS,volume 19))

Abstract

The elderly care system’s sustainability is one of the largest societal challenges of our time. Digitalization and the implementation of technologies in elderly care are viewed as offering possible solutions to the social and economic challenges of sustainability. This study’s objective is to examine the development, implementation, and diffusion of technologies in elderly care from a sociotechnical perspective, leaning on the concepts of sociotechnical transitions. The focus mainly is on sustainable niche development, including interactions between niches and regimes in terms of sustainable sociotechnical transitions, how niches are developed in relation to sustainability, and in which conditions and circumstances promising niches can contribute to regime change in elderly care. Through a multiple-case study in different living environments of elderly residents in Finland, we identify factors that facilitate or hinder sustainable development and the implementation and diffusion of technologies in elderly care. The three case studies concern various types of development: introduction of tablet computers in senior housing, construction of a multisensory room in a care home, and the use of a care robot in care homes and in a rehabilitation hospital. Critical factors for sustainable niche development include involving users in the development processes, as well as simultaneous development of technologies and services. The multifaceted and effective use of technologies requires time and resources. Critical factors in niche-regime interaction are, for example, factors relating to attitudes, as well as technologies’ maturity. The need to consider a wider perspective, rather than a singular disruption, is key.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Auping, W. L., Pruyt, E., & Kwakkel, J. H. (2015). Societal ageing in the Netherlands: A robust system dynamics approach. Systems Research and Behavioural Science, 32(4), 485–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkhout, F., Wieczorek, A. J., & Raven, R. (2011). Avoiding environmental convergence: A possible role for sustainability experiments in late-comer countries? International Journal of Institutions and Economics, 3(2), 367–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, C. (2015). Enhancing joined-up government and outcome-based performance management through system-dynamics modelling to deal with wicked problems: The case of societal ageing. Systems Research and Behavioural Science, 32(4), 502–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boström, M. (2012). A missing pillar? Challenges in theorising and practicing social sustainability: Introduction to the special issue. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 8(1), 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugge, M., Coenen, L., Marques, P., & Morgan, K. (2017). Governing system innovation: Assisted living experiments in the UK and Norway. European Planning Studies, 25(12), 2138–2156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui, S., Cardona, A., Laminen, C., & Cerf, M. (2016). Sustainability transitions: Insights on processes of niche-regime interaction and regime reconfiguration in agri-food systems. Journal of Rural Studies, 48, 92–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compagna, D., & Kohlbacher, F. (2015). The limits of participatory technology development: The case of service robots in care facilities for older people. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 93, 19), 19–19), 31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative enquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elzen, B., van Mierlo, B., & Leeuwis, C. (2012). Anchoring of innovations: Assessing Dutch efforts to harvest energy from glasshouses. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 5, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essink, D. R. (2012). Sustainable health systems: The role of change agents in health system innovation. Amsterdam: VU University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineberg, H. V. (2012). A successful and sustainable health system – How to get there from here. New England Journal of Medicine, 366(11), 1020–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finne-Soveri, H., Pohjola, L., Keränen, J., & Raivio, K. (2014). Pysyvästi aktivoivaan arkeen - InnoKusti-hanke 2007–2010 ja miten sitten kävi. Helsinki: Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos. (in Finnish.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, R. B. (2004). Caregivers and long-term care needs: Will public policy meet the challenge? Georgetown University Long-Term Care Financing Project, Issue Brief. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8/9), 1257–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2004). Understanding system innovations: A critical literature review and a conceptual synthesis. In B. Elzen, F. W. Geels, & K. Green (Eds.), System innovation and the transition to sustainability (pp. 19–47). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2005). Technological transitions and system innovations: A co-evolutionary and sociotechnical analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 24–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2012). A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: Introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 471–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2018). Disruption and low-carbon system transformation: Progress and new challenges in socio-technical transitions research and the Multi-Level Perspective. Energy Research & Social Science, 37, 224–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W., & Kemp, R. (2007). Dynamics in socio-technical systems: Typology of change processes and contrasting case studies. Technology in Society, 29(4), 441–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. W. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilleard, C., & Higgs, P. (2002). The third age: Class, cohort or generation? Ageing and Society, 22(3), 369–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grin, J., & Broerse, J. (Eds.). (2017a). Toward sustainable transitions in healthcare systems. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grin, J., & Broerse, J. (2017b). Introduction. In J. Grin & J. Broerse (Eds.), Toward sustainable transitions in healthcare systems (pp. 1–20). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, J. (2001). The fourth pillar of sustainability. Culture’s essential role in public planning. Victoria: Common Ground Publishing Pvt Ltd in association with the Cultural Development Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennala, L., Koistinen, P., Kyrki, V., Kämäräinen, J.-K., Laitinen, A., Lanne, M., Lehtinen, H., Leminen, S., Melkas, H., Niemelä, M., Parviainen, J., Pekkarinen, S., Pieters, R., Pirhonen, J., Ruohomäki, I., Särkikoski, T., Tuisku, O., Tuominen, K., Turja, T., & Van Aerschot, L. (2017). Robotics in care services: A Finnish roadmap. Available at: http://roseproject.aalto.fi/images/publications/Roadmap-final02062017.pdf

  • Hyppönen, H., & Ilmarinen, K. (2016). Sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollon digitalisaatio (Digitalisation in social services and health care). National Institute for Health and Welfare. Available at: https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/131301/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-739-8.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed 12 Jan 2018.

  • Kapadia, V., Ariani, A., Li, J., & Ray, P. K. (2015). Emerging ICT implementation issues in aged care. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 84(11), 982–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10(2), 175–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivisaari, S., & Saranummi, N. (2008). Vuorovaikutteisuus ja systeemiset innovaatiot terveydenhuollossa. In J. Saari (Ed.), Sosiaaliset innovaatiot ja hyvinvointivaltion muutos (pp. 280–300). Helsinki: Sosiaali- ja terveysturvan keskusliitto. (in Finnish).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivisaari, S., Lovio, R., & Väyrynen, E. (2004). Managing experiments for transition. In B. Elzen, F. Geels, & K. Green (Eds.), System innovation and the transition to sustainability: Theory, evidence and policy (pp. 223–250). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivisaari, S., Saari, E., Lehto, J., Kokkinen, L., & Saranummi, N. (2013). System innovations in the making: Hybrid actors and the challenge of up-scaling. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(2), 187–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laslett, P. (1989). A fresh map of life: The emergence of the third age. London: Weidengfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littig, B., & Griessler, E. (2005). Social sustainability: A catchword between political pragmatism and social theory. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1–2), 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malanowski, N. (2008). Matching demand and supply: Future technologies for active ageing in Europe. In F. Kohlbacher & C. Herstatt (Eds.), The silver market phenomenon. Business opportunities in an era of demographic change (pp. 41–53). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markand, J., & Truffer, B. (2006). Innovation processes in large technical systems: Market liberalisation as a driver for radical change? Research Policy, 35(5), 609–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markand, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melkas, H., & Anker, R. (1998). Gender equality and occupational segregation in Nordic labour markets. Geneva: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neven, L. (2015). By any means? Questioning the link between gerontechnological innovation and older people’s wish to live at home. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 93, 32–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oborn, E., & Barrett, S. K. (2016). Digital health and citizen engagement: Changing the face of health service delivery. Health Services Management Research, 29(1–2), 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Östlund, B. (2017). Digitising health care welfare technology as a way to meet digital and demographic challenges in Sweden. Fourth International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Östlund, B., Olander, E., Johnsson, O., & Frennert, S. (2015). STS-inspired design to meet the challenges of modern ageing: Welfare technology as a tool to promote user-driven innovations or another way to keep older users hostage? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 93, 82–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peine, A., Faulkner, A., Jæger, B., & Moors, E. (2015). Science, technology and the ‘grand challenge’ of ageing: Understanding the socio-material constitution of later life. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 93, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekkarinen, S. (2011). Innovation of ageing and societal transition: Dynamics of change of the sociotechnical regime of ageing (Acta Universitatis Lappeenrantaensis 423). Lappeenranta: Lappeenranta University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekkarinen, S., & Hennala, L. (2016). Robotiikan haasteista. Finnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare, 8(2–3), 137–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekkarinen, S., & Melkas, H. (2017). Digitalisation in health care and elderly care services: From potholes to innovation opportunities. International Journal of Information Systems and Social Change, 8(1), 24–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekkarinen, S., & Melkas, H. (2018; in press). Welfare state transition in the making: Focus on the niche-regime interaction in Finnish elderly care services. Technological Forecasting and Social Change https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.015

  • Pekkarinen, S., Hyypiä, M., Melkas, H., & Mäkinen, S. (2017). Kokemuksia tablettitietokoneiden käyttöönotosta osana ikääntyneiden asumista. Lahti Science Day. 9 November 2017. (in Finnish.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Raappana, A., & Melkas, H. (2009). Teknologian hallittu käyttö vanhuspalveluissa. Opas teknologiapäätösten ja teknologian käytön tueksi. Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lahti School of Innovation. (in Finnish and Swedish).

    Google Scholar 

  • Regional Government, Health and Social Services Reform (2018). https://alueuudistus.fi/en/reform-of-regional-administration

  • Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ródenas, F., & Garcés, J. (2017). Toward a sustainable welfare and health system in Spain: Experiences with the case-management program. In J. Grin & J. Broerse (Eds.), Toward sustainable transitions in healthcare systems (pp. 132–152). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schot, J., & Geels, F. (2008). Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda and policy. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 20(5), 537–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, C., & Dorner, T. E. (2017). Information technologies for active and assisted-living: Influences to the quality of life of an ageing society. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 100, 32–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smink, M., Negro, S. O., Niesten, E., & Hekkert, M. P. (2015). How mismatching institutional logics hinder niche–regime interaction and how boundary spanners intervene. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 100, 225–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2007). Translating sustainabilities between green niches and socio-technical regimes. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19(4), 427–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., Voss, J.-P., & Grin, J. (2010). Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges. Research Policy, 39(4), 435–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toebes, B. C. A. (1999). The right to health as a human right in international law (School of Human Rights Research series) (Vol. 1). Antwerp: Intersentia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2012). Environmental innovation and sustainability transitions in regional studies. Regional Studies, 46(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuisku, O., Pekkarinen, S., Hennala, L., & Melkas, H. (2017). Robotit innovaationa hyvinvointipalveluissa. Kysely kentän eri toimijoiden tarpeista, rooleista ja yhteistyöstä. Lappeenrannan teknillinen yliopisto, Tutkimusraportit 70, Lahti. (in Finnish.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulli-Beer, S. (2013). Conceptual grounds of socio-technical transitions and governance. In S. Ulli-Beer (Ed.), Dynamic governance of energy technology change (pp. 19–47). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vavik, T., & Keitsch, M. (2010). Exploring relationships between universal design and socially sustainable development: Some methodological aspects to the debate on the sciences of sustainability. Sustainable Development, 18(5), 295–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazan, B. (2015). Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam and Stake. Qualitative Report, 20(2), 134–152. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol20/iss2/12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Applied social research methods series). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Tekes, The Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation (project name: “Revolution of the Service Economy: Human Being at the Core of Digitalization”), the Strategic Research Council at the Academy of Finland (project name: “Robots and the Future of Welfare Services” [ROSE], decision numbers 292980 and 314180), and the LUT Research Platform on Smart Services for Digitalisation (DIGI-USER).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT, Lahti, Finland

    Satu Pekkarinen, Helinä Melkas & Mirva Hyypiä

Authors
  1. Satu Pekkarinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Helinä Melkas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mirva Hyypiä
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satu Pekkarinen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

    Marja Toivonen

  2. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland

    Eveliina Saari

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pekkarinen, S., Melkas, H., Hyypiä, M. (2019). Elderly Care and Digital Services: Toward a Sustainable Sociotechnical Transition. In: Toivonen, M., Saari, E. (eds) Human-Centered Digitalization and Services. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 19. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7725-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation