Abstract
Experimental development has been suggested to answer the problems of slowness and ineffectiveness in current innovation activities. It is also applied in the public sector, where it raises specific issues due to traditional bureaucracy and strong professionalism. In our study, carried out via interviews, we examined experimental development and its challenges in a middle-sized Finnish city. The experiment focused on a new integrated model of wellbeing that aimed to promote multi-professional collaboration and citizen empowerment in child and family services. A common service plan and a digital platform were core elements in the model. However, the purpose of the experiment remained too vague to the practitioners, and the experiment was stopped before the deadline. Central challenges were the one-sided focus on top-down management, growing workload and problems of the digital platform. Despite the ‘failure’, the experiment offered valuable learnings that can be applied in the future. Clarifying the concept of experimenting and improving the collaboration between local activities and governmental policies are among the most important lessons learned.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alam, I., & Perry, C. (2002). A customer-oriented new service development process. Journal of Services Marketing, 16(6), 515–534.
Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860.
Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2011). Business research methods (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Buijs, J. (2003). Modelling product innovation processes, from linear logic to circular chaos. Creativity and Innovation Management, 12(2), 76–93.
Chesbrough, H. (2011). Open services innovation: Rethinking your business to grow and compete in a new era. New York: Wiley.
Christensen, T. (2012). Post-NPM and changing public governance. Meiji Journal of Political Science and Economics, 1, 1–11.
Cooper, R. G., & De Brentani, U. (1991). New industrial financial services: What distinguishes winners. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 8(2), 75–90.
Currie, C., Lockett, A., Finn, R., Martin, G., & Waring, J. (2012). Institutional work to maintain professional power: Recreating the model of medical professionalism. Organization Studies, 33(7), 937–962.
Dent, M., & Whitehead, S. (2002). Introduction: Configuring the “new” professional. In M. Dent & S. Whitehead (Eds.), Managing professional identities (pp. 1–19). New York: Routledge.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Tabrizi, B. N. (1995). Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 84–110.
Engvall, M., Magnusson, P., Marshall, C., Olin, T., & Sandberg R. (2001). Creative approaches to development: Exploring alternatives to sequential stage-gate models (working paper), Fenix WP 2001 (p. 17).
Evetts, J. (2003). The sociological analysis of professionalism: Occupational change in the modern world. International Sociology, 18(2), 395–415.
Ferlie, E., Fitzgerald, L., Wood, M., & Hawkins, C. (2005). The nonspread of innovations: The mediating role of professionals. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 117–134.
Fuglsang, L. (2010). Bricolage and invisible innovation in public sector innovation. Journal of Innovation Economics, 5(1), 67–87.
Fuglsang, L., & Sørensen, F. (2011). The balance between bricolage and innovation: Management dilemmas in sustainable public innovation. Service Industries Journal, 31(4), 581–595.
Harrisson, D., Klein, J.-L., & Browne, P. L. (2010). Social innovation, social enterprise and services. In F. Gallouj & F. Djellal (Eds.), The handbook of innovation and services (pp. 197–281). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money and Management, 25(1), 27–34.
Hasu, M. (2001). Critical transition from developers to users – Activity theoretical studies of interaction and learning in the innovation process. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Education.
Honka, A., Kaipainen, K., Hietala, H., & Saranummi, N. (2011). Rethinking health: ICT-enabled services to empower people to manage their health. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 4(2011), 119–139.
Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.
Høyrup, S. (2012). Employee-driven innovation: A new phenomenon, concept and mode of innovation. In S. Høyrup, M. Bonnafous-Boucher, C. Hasse, M. Lotz, & K. Moller (Eds.), Employee-driven innovation: A new approach (pp. 3–33). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Huberman, A. M., & Miles, M. B. (1994). Data management and analysis method. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 428–444). Sage: Thousand Oaks.
Kesting, P., & Ulhøi, J. P. (2010). Employee-driven innovation: Extending the licence to foster innovation. Management Decision, 48, 65–84.
Koen, P., Ajamian, G., Burkart, R., Clamen, A., Davidson, J., D’Amore, R., Elkins, C., Herald, K., Incorvia, M., Johnson, A., Karol, R., Seibert, R., Slavejkov, A., & Wagner, K. (2001). Providing clarity and a common language to the fuzzy front end. Research-Technology Management, 44(2), 46–55.
Langergaard, L. L. (2011). Understanding of ‘users’ and ‘innovation’ in a public sector context. In J. Sundbo & M. Toivonen (Eds.), User-based innovation in services (pp. 203–226). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edwards Elgar.
Lundvall, B.-Å. (2001). Innovation policy in the globalizing learning economy. In D. Archibugi & B.-Å. Lundvall (Eds.), The globalizing learning economy (pp. 273–291). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moore, M., & Hartley, J. (2008). Innovations in governance. Public Management Review, 10(1), 3–20.
Moorman, C., & Miner, A. S. (1998). The convergence of planning and execution: Improvisation in new product development. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 1–20.
Moulaert, F. F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw, E., & Gonzalez, S. (2005). Towards alternative model(s) of local innovation. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1969–1990.
Mäkinen, M. (2006). Digital empowerment as a process for enhancing citizens’ participation. E-Learning, 3(3), 381–395.
Määttä, H., Ruutu, S., & Toivonen, M. (2014). Revealing the complexities of health care renewal: A system dynamics approach. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on applied human factors and ergonomics AHFE 2014 (4th ed.).
Newman, J., & Clarke. (2009). Public, politics and power: Remaking the public in public services. Thousand Oaks/London: Sage.
Nordlund, H. (2009). Constructing customer understanding in front end of innovation. Tampere: Acta Universitatis Tamperensis.
Orr, L. L. (1999). Social experiments: Evaluating public programs with experimental methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Papastergiou, M. (2009). Exploring the potential of computer and video games for health and physical education: A literature review. Computers Education, 53(3), 603–622.
Read, S., Dew, N., Sarasvathy, S. D., Song, M., & Wiltbank, R. (2009). Marketing under uncertainty: The logic of an effectual approach. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 1–18.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, XLIV, 652–667.
Samoocha, D., Bruinvels, D. J., Elbers, N. A., Anema, J. R., & van der Beek, A. J. (2010). Effectiveness of web-based interventions on patient empowerment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 12(2), e23.
Sarasvathy, S. D., & Kotha, S. (2001). Dealing with Knightian uncertainty in the new economy: The real networks case. In J. Butler (Ed.), Research on management and entrepreneurship (Vol. 1, pp. 31–62). Greenwich: IAP Inc.
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2008). Effectuation: Elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Skelcher, C., & Smith, S. R. (2015). Theorizing hybridity: Institutional logics, complex organizations, and actor identities: The case of nonprofits. Public Administration, 93(2), 433–448.
Sundbo, J. (2008). Customer-based innovation of knowledge e-services – The importance of after-innovation. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 9(3–4), 218–233.
Sundbo, J., & Toivonen, M. (2011). Introduction. In J. Sundbo & M. Toivonen (Eds.), User-based innovation in services. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Sørensen, E. (2002). Democratic theory and network governance. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 24(4), 693–720.
Tempo Economics. (2017). Kuntakokeilut kuntien velvoitteiden vähentämisen tueksi -hankkeen arviointi. Retrieved from https://vm.fi/documents/10623/1230344/Tempon+loppuraportti/7e97f66a-8be7-4680-9b3b-be530d3667fa/Tempon+loppuraportti.pdf.
Tummers, L., Bekkers, V., & Steijn, B. (2009). Policy alienation of public professionals: Application in a new public management context. Public Management Review, 11(85), 685–706.
Torfing, J., & Triantafillou, P. (2013). What’s in name? Grasping new public governance as a political-administrative system. International Review of Public Administration, 18(2), 9–25.
Toivonen, M. (2010). Different types of innovation processes in services and their organisational implications. In F. Gallouj & F. Djellal (Eds.), The handbook of innovation and services (pp. 221–249). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.
von Hippel, E. (1978). Successful industrial products from customer ideas. Journal of Marketing, 42(1), 39–49.
von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 791–805.
Webb, T. L., Joseph, J., Yardley, L., & Michie, S. (2010). Using the internet to promote health behavior change: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 12(1), e4.
WHO. (1997). The Jakarta declaration on health promotion in the 21st century, HPR/HEP/4ICHP/BR/97.4. Geneva: WHO.
Windrum, P. (2008). Introduction. In P. Windrum & P. Koch (Eds.), Innovation in public sector services: Entrepreneurship, creativity and management (pp. 3–20). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leväsluoto, J., Hyytinen, K., Toivonen, M. (2019). Innovation by Experimenting in Public Services. In: Toivonen, M., Saari, E. (eds) Human-Centered Digitalization and Services. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 19. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7725-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7725-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7724-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7725-9
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)