Skip to main content

Methodology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Institutional Disrespect
  • 202 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces the design of the research project. It starts out by outlining my research design, including my theoretical lens as a researcher, my methodology and the methods used in the study. The section ‘Data Collection and Analysis’ reports on data collection and analysis, including locating myself in the research. It concludes by discussing the limitations of the research and also how the validity of both the participant accounts and the conclusions reached were ensured throughout the research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Key disciplinary contributions include sociology, psychology, regulatory studies, anthropology and history.

  2. 2.

    When meeting with people, I would introduce myself as a volunteer worker from Australia taking a break from my PhD studies on the resettlement in Australia of former refugees from Southern Sudan.

  3. 3.

    The ethnic groups of South Sudan are outlined in Chap. 2.

  4. 4.

    If the opportunity presented itself, I mentioned to my participants that I migrated to Australia from Eastern Europe during my young adult years. My disclosure was acknowledged with acceptance, but did not appear to be perceived as relevant to our discussions.

References

  • Benhabib, S. (2002). The claims of culture: Equality and diversity in the global era. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1978). A realist theory of science. Brighton, UK: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. E. (2003). Situational analyses: Grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn. Symbolic Interaction, 26(4), 553–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danermark, B., Ekström, M., Jakobsen, L., & Karlsson, J. C. (2002). Explaining society. Critical realism in the social sciences. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firestone, W. A. (1993). Alternative arguments for generalizing from data as applied to qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 22(4), 16–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, J. (1995). Being and doing: Practicing a secret profession. Reflections, 4(1), 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1983). Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, C., & Maiden, S. (2007). Race to point finger of blame. The Australian. Retrieved from http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22538228-28737,00.html

  • Iosifides, T. (2012). Migration research between positivistic scientism and relativism: A critical realist way out. In C. Vargas-Silva (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in migration (pp. 26–49). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalist inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Losoncz, I. (2014). Absence of respect: South Sudanese experiences of Australian government and social institutions. PhD, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Losoncz, I. (2017). Methodological approaches and considerations in regulatory research. In P. Drahos (Ed.), Regulation, institutions and networks (pp. 77–96). Canberra, ACT: ANU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, J. M. (2009). Accessing ‘authentic’ knowledge: Being and doing with the Sudanese community. The Australian Community Psychologist, 21(1), 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, J. M. (2010). ‘Walking the Line’: Southern Sudanese narratives and responding to trauma. PhD dissertation, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. A. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 62(3), 279–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. (2004). Beyond the frontstage: Trust, access, and the relational context in research with refugee communities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 33(3/4), 217–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (2012). Critical realist grounded theory: A New approach for social work research. British Journal of Social Work, 42(2), 371–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, F. (2006). Ordinary language interviewing. In D. Yanow & P. Schwartz-Shea (Eds.), Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn (pp. 150–160). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Vauxhall, UK: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Manen, M. (1977). Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 6(3), 205–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westoby, P. (2009). The sociality of refugee healing: In dialogue with Southern Sudanese refugees Resettling within Australia – Towards a social model of healing. Seaholme, Australia: Common Ground.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ibolya Losoncz .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Losoncz, I. (2019). Methodology. In: Institutional Disrespect. Palgrave Pivot, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7717-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics