Historical Changes of “Indo-Pacific” Geo-economics and Development Demands of India

  • Yang Yishuang
Part of the Research Series on the Chinese Dream and China’s Development Path book series (RSCDCDP)


India is anxious to strengthen the relations with the Asian-Pacific region, yet the “Act East Policy” doesn’t perform as well as it expected. Moreover, because it is difficult to gain an edge on the competition with China on regional economic presence, India prefers to see a new cooperation framework, which could let India play a more important role in it, and meanwhile provide India with the alternative proposals in various aspects to make up for India’s inadequacies. The introduction of “Indo-Pacific” concept is just in line with such demands of India. But the “Indo-Pacific” concept is vague at the economic level and has no practical effect on improving India’s economic presence in this region. For the existing Asia-Pacific cooperation mechanism, “Indo-Pacific” is purely a destructive factor and lacks the ability to build a new mechanism. At time of pursuing the profits brought by “Indo-Pacific”, India could hardly leave such factors out of account. Due to the independence of its development goals, India’s participation in “Indo-Pacific” must be limited.


Indo-Pacific Geo-economics India The Indian Ocean 


  1. Cai, Yiming. 2009. A Study on the Alternation of Economic Hegemonic Powers in the World. Economic Review 5: 93–102.Google Scholar
  2. Cai, Yiming. 2011. Hegemony Cycle in World Economy: One Model for Single Country. Journal of International Trade 9: 169–176.Google Scholar
  3. Liu, Zongyi. 2014. Conflict or Cooperation?—Geopolitical and Geo-economic Choices in ‘Indo-Pacific Region. Indian Ocean Economic and Political Review 4: 4–20.Google Scholar
  4. Lou, Chunhao. 2018. Asia-Pacific Growth Corridor” Initiative: Connotation, Motivation and Prospect”. International Studies 1.Google Scholar
  5. Raja Mohan. 2016. Modi’s World. Translated by C. Zhu and Y. Yang. Social Sciences Academic Press, p. 118 (India).Google Scholar
  6. Singh, Z.D. 2018. India and China Can Coexist in the Indo–Pacific. Economic and Political Weekly 53 (13).Google Scholar
  7. Wilson, Jeffrey D. 2017. Investing in the economic architecture of the Indo-Pacific. Indo-Pacific Insight Series 8: 4.
  8. Xia, Liping. 2015. U.S. Indo-Pacific Strategy from Geopolitical and Geo-economics Perspectives. The Chinese Journal of American Studies 2: 32–51.Google Scholar
  9. Yang, Rui, & Wang, Shida. 2018. India and ‘Indo-Pacific Strategic Conception’—Positioning, Intervention and Limitation. Contemporary International Relations 1: 46–53.Google Scholar
  10. Zhao, Gancheng. 2009. India: Major Country Prestige and Major Country Diplomacy. Shanghai People’s Publishing House 1: 3.Google Scholar
  11. Zhao, Qinghai. 2013. Concept ‘Indo-Pacific’ and Implications for China. Contemporary International Relations 7: 14–22.Google Scholar
  12. Zhou, Fangyin, & Wang, Wan. 2018. Indo-Pacific Strategy and China’s Response from the Perspective of Australia. Contemporary International Relations 1: 29–36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Social Sciences Academic Press and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yang Yishuang
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Institute for Indian OceanYunnan University of Finance and EconomicsKunmingChina

Personalised recommendations