The Prospect of the “Indo-Pacific” Concept and China’s Countermeasures

  • Hailin Ye
Part of the Research Series on the Chinese Dream and China’s Development Path book series (RSCDCDP)


The report has reviewed the development and evolution process of the concept of “Indo-Pacific”, outlined the attitude of the United States, Japan, India and Australia towards the Trump version of the “Indo-Pacific” concept, analyzed the strategic intention of the parties concerned to push “Indo-Pacific” from concept to actual operation and on this basis, discussed the future trends and policy prospects of the interaction among the United States, Japan, India and Australia under the “Indo-Pacific” concept. The report believes that although Trump’s “Indo-Pacific” concept shows the strategic intent of the United States to prevent the rise of its strategic rivals, reinforces its collaboration with major allies in the Pacific, satisfies India’s vanity as a world power and can contain China to some extent, however, due to the lack of implementation means, inadequate geopolitical conditions and the difficulty to coordinate the strategic demands of all parties concerned, it is hard for “Indo-Pacific” strategy led by the US to achieve the goal of reconstructing global strategic pattern and preventing by the US of the rise of strategic rivals.


Indo-Pacific US-Japan-India-Australia Strategic intention Strategic capability 


  1. Li, Li. 2018. “India’s Look East Strategy and Indo-Pacific Diplomacy”. Contemporary International Relations (1).Google Scholar
  2. Lin, Mingwang. 2018. “The Construction of Indo-Pacific and the Tension of Asian Geopolitics”. Foreign Affairs Review (1).Google Scholar
  3. Song, Wei. 2016. “On Australia’s Concept of Indo-Pacific System and Its Choice of Strategic Path”. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition) (2).Google Scholar
  4. Wei, Zongyou. 2013. “The Impact of the “Indo-Pacific” Concept on the Multilateral Pattern of the Asia-Pacific Region”. World Economics and Politics (10).Google Scholar
  5. Wu, Zhaoli. 2014. “The Origin of “Indo-Pacific” and Multinational Strategic Game”. Pacific Journal (1).Google Scholar
  6. Wu, Huaizhong. 2018. “The Abe Administration’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and China’s Countermeasures”. Contemporary International Relations (1), 2018.Google Scholar
  7. Xia, Liping. 2015. “The ‘Indo-Pacific Strategy’ of the United States from the Dual Perspective of Geopolitics and Geo-economics”. American Studies (2).Google Scholar
  8. Xu, Jinjin. 2018. “The Trump Administration’s ‘Indo-Pacific Strategy’”, American Studies (1).Google Scholar
  9. Zhang, Li. 2013. “On Australia’s Concept of Indo-Pacific System and Its Choice of Strategic Path”. South Asian Studies Quarterly (4).Google Scholar
  10. Zhang, Dongshun. 2017. “The Current Strategic Adjustment of Japan in the US Indo-Pacific Strategy”. Journal of Strategy and Decision Making (2).Google Scholar
  11. Zhang, Genhai, and Ying Wang. 2018. “The Orientation Analysis of the US-India-Japan-Australia Combination on the Security of the South China Sea from the Perspective of ‘Indo-Pacific Strategic Arc’”. South Asian Studies (1).Google Scholar
  12. Zhao, Qinghai. 2013. “The Strategic Adjustment of the United States in the Indo-Pacific Region and Its Geostrategic Implications”. Contemporary International Relations (7).Google Scholar
  13. Zhou, Fangyin, and Wan Wang. 2018. “The Indo-Pacific Strategy From the Perspective of Australia and China’s Countermeasures”. Contemporary International Relations (1).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Social Sciences Academic Press and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hailin Ye
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.National Institute of International Strategy, CASSBeijingChina
  2. 2.Yunnan University of Finance and EconomicsKunmingChina

Personalised recommendations