New Trend in the Construction of “Indo-Pacific” and Its Impact on South Asia

  • ChuanLu Feng
Part of the Research Series on the Chinese Dream and China’s Development Path book series (RSCDCDP)


In 2017, the concept of “Indo-Pacific” continues to develop further. The latest sign indicates that the construction of the concept may go beyond “hype” and enter the strategic level, and even to the specific deployment. At the same time, a series of regional effects and chain reactions brought about by the strategic adjustment of great powers and the reshaping of international relations have gradually emerged under the construction of the “Indo-Pacific” concept. For example, Trump hypes the concept of “Indo-Pacific” and the “Indo-Pacific strategy” of the US surfaces gradually. The relations between the US and India continue to develop further with bilateral defense co-operations on the rise in both frequency and quality. The Sino-Indian relations have declined significantly, and the flattening trend of the strategic triangle among China, the US and India has become more prominent. Japan and India have accelerated their strategies cooperation, and the security dialogue among the four countries is re-launched. Small and medium-sized countries in the relevant regions have actively engaged in strategic speculation and power rent-seeking. All of these events have exerted pressure on China’s geopolitical security and rise. As far as the influence of the “Indo-Pacific” construction on South Asia is concerned, it has not only enhanced the strategic position of South Asia in global geopolitics, but also deepened the imbalance of power structure here. It has strengthened the strategic role of India, but increased the rift in international relations in South Asia. It has greatly raised the strategic importance of Sri Lanka and the Maldives in the Indian Ocean, but almost completely ignored the inland areas of Bhutan, Nepal and Bangladesh. It has not only made different South Asian countries enjoy different environment in international strategies, but also restricts the formation of regional cooperation and regionalism in South Asia. The New South Asia Strategy of the Trump Administration, in particular, may further tear South Asia from the security strategy, while the increasingly tough South Asian Policy of India in the Modi era may further deteriorate the international isolation of regional countries to Pakistan, and may even exclude and hinder China’s efforts to promote economic integration and regional stability in South Asia.


“Indo-Pacific” “Indo-Pacific Strategy” Regional effects New South Asia Strategy of the US South Asia Pattern 


  1. Cao, Yibing. 2015. Research on Geographical Visual Analysis Technology of Land Borders. Ph.D Thesis of PLA Information Engineering University, p. 8.Google Scholar
  2. Chen, Jimin. 2017. The “Indo-Pacific” Strategy of the Trump Administration is Still Unclear. China Defense News, December 22.Google Scholar
  3. Chen, Jimin. 2018. Trump Administration “Indo-Pacific Strategy”: Policies and Limits. Peace and Development (1): 26–42.Google Scholar
  4. Dai, Yonghong, and Yonghong, Qin. 2010. The Geopolitical Strategic Considerations in Energy Cooperation between China and South Asia. Journal of Sichuan University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) (2): 79.Google Scholar
  5. Feng, Chuanlu. 2017. A Survey of Geopolitical Patterns and Regional Situations in South Asia from the Perspective of the Belt and Road Initiative. South Asian Studies (3): 3, 4.Google Scholar
  6. Kronstadt, KA, and SI Akhtar. 2017. “India-U.S. Relations: Issues for Congress”. Congressional Research Service Report, 19 June 2017, 15.
  7. Li, Yiqing. 2017. To Fight Against The Belt and Road, ASEAN-India Communication Summit Held and Japan Invited. The paper. cn, 11 December 2017.
  8. Li, Li. 2018. India’s “Act East” Strategy and Indian Diplomacy. Modern International Relations (1): 37–45.Google Scholar
  9. Lin, Minwang. 2017. India–Japan Relations Entering the “Honeymoon Period”? Contemporary World (10): 27.Google Scholar
  10. Lin, Minwang. 2018. The Construction of “Indo-Pacific” and the Tension of Asian Geopolitics. Diplomatic Review (1): 16–35, 28.Google Scholar
  11. Liu, Zongyi. 2014. Conflict or Cooperation?—Geopolitical and Geoeconomic Choices in the “Indo-Pacific” Region”. Indian Ocean Economies (4).Google Scholar
  12. Mei, Xiuting. 2017. “Indo-Pacific Strategy”: The Essence of Abe’s new Diplomatic Strategy. Learning Times, 20 February 2017.Google Scholar
  13. Mu, Xiaoming. 2016. India–Vietnam Defense Cooperation Continues to Heat up but Has Limited Impact on Regional Patter. China Youth Daily, 1 October 2016.Google Scholar
  14. Wang, Daozheng. 2017. The Construction and Prospects of the Asia–Africa Growth Corridor by India and Japan. Research on the Indian Ocean Economies (5): 125.Google Scholar
  15. Wei, Zongyou. 2013. The Strategic Adjustment of the US in the Indo-Pacific Region and Its Geostrategic Impact. World Economics and Politics (10): 141.Google Scholar
  16. Wu, Zhaoli. 2014. The Origin of “Indo-Pacific” and Multinational Strategic Game. Journal of the Pacific (1).Google Scholar
  17. Wu, Zhaoli. 2016. India’s “Toward East” and Vietnam “Toward West”: The Driving Force behind Strategic Interactions. World Knowledge (3): 34.Google Scholar
  18. Wu, Minwen. 2017. Trump’s Indo-Pacific Strategy Intended to Prevent China. China Youth Daily, 22 December 2017.Google Scholar
  19. Wu, Huaizhong. 2018a. Abe Government’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and China’s Response. Modern International Relations (1): 13–21.Google Scholar
  20. Wu, Huaizhong. 2018b. The Indo-Pacific Strategy of Abe Government and China’s response. Modern International Relations (1).Google Scholar
  21. Wu, Zhaoli. 2018c. Development, Limitations and China’s Response to the Indo-Pacific Strategy. Journal of Xinjiang Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 39: 1–9.Google Scholar
  22. Xia, Liping, and Zhong Qi. 2018. Analysis of “Indian Strategic Concept” Under the Trump Administration. Modern International Relations (1): 22–28.Google Scholar
  23. Yang, Rui, and Shida Wang. 2018. India and “Indo-Pacific Strategic Conception”: Positioning, Intervention and Limitations. Modern International Relations (1): 46–52.Google Scholar
  24. Zhang, Li. 2013. The Impact of the “Indo-Pacific” Concept on the Multilateral Pattern of the Asia-Pacific Region. South Asian Research Quarterly (4).Google Scholar
  25. Zhang, Li. 2017. Tillerson’s Trip to India and Pakistan: Accurate Delivery of the Policy of the US to South Asia. World Knowledge (22): 80.Google Scholar
  26. Zhang, Hualong. 2018. Vietnamese President Chen Daguang Visited India, the India–Vietnam Defense Cooperation has been the Focus under the “Indo-Pacific” strategy. Wen Wei Po, 2 March 2018.Google Scholar
  27. Zhao, Qinghai. 2013a. The Concept of “Indo-Pacific” and Its Implications for China. Modern International Relations (7): 14.Google Scholar
  28. Zhao, Qinghai. 2013b. The Concept of “Indo-Taiwan” and Its Implications for China. Modern International Relations (7).Google Scholar
  29. Zhao, Gancheng. 2016. China’s Challenges and Responses in the Surroundings of South Asia. International Relations Research (1): 36.Google Scholar
  30. Zhong, Lin. 2018. Accelerated Evolution of the Order in Area with Strong Economic Growth—A Summary of the Situation in South Asia. Contemporary World (2): 59.Google Scholar
  31. Zhou, Liangchen. 2017. Modi’s Visit to Sri Lanka to Consolidate India’s influence for Not Tending to China. Global Times, 12 May 2017.Google Scholar
  32. Zhou, Fangyin, and Wan, Wang. 2018. Indian Strategy from the Perspective of Australia and China’s Response. Modern International Relations (1): 29–36.Google Scholar
  33. Zhu, Cuiping. 2015. The Dilemma and Strategic Choice of the Indian Modi Government’s Policy to China. South Asian Studies (3): 12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Social Sciences Academic Press and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • ChuanLu Feng
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Research Institute for Indian Ocean Economies (RIIO)Yunnan University of Finance and EconomicsKunmingChina

Personalised recommendations