Skip to main content

Ultimate Load Behaviour of Segmental Composite Slabs at Different Shear Connectors

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 464 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering ((LNMUINEN))

Abstract

As India is developing country infrastructure plays major role to be kept in view of infrastructure requirements, to keep down road transport interference and speedy establishment of way overs by using prefabricated concrete with in situ concrete composite construction, i.e., prefabricated slab proceeds like a support to affix with in situ reinforced concrete using shear connectors. To increase the strength of composite slab by using different types of shear connectors. Numerical modelling and analysis of composite one-way and two-way slabs under flexure with truss-type, lattice-type and dual-steel-type shear connectors are used to find the efficiency, comparatively and percentage integrity with solid slab.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Červenka, V., Jendele, L., Červenka, J.: ATENA Theory Manual. Cervenka Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benayoune, A., Samad, A.A.A., Trikha, D.N., Ali, A.A.A., Ellinna, S.H.M.: Flexural behaviour of pre-cast concrete sandwich composite panel—experimental and theoretical investigations. Constr. Build. Mater. 22, 580–592 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bush, T.D., Stine, G.L.: Flexural behavior of composite precast concrete sandwich panels with continuous truss type connectors. PCI J. 39, 112–121 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. CEB-FIP Model Code 1990: Comite Euro International Du Beton

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pantelides, C.P., Surapaneni, R., Reaveley, L.: Structural performance of hybrid GFRP/steel concrete sandwich panels. J. Compos. Constr. 12(5), 570 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2008)12:5(570)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. David, A., Salmon, D.C., Tadros, M.K., Culp, T.: Full-scale testing of precast concrete sandwich panels. ACI Struct. J. 94-3S2 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures. EN 1992-1-1

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eurocode 4: Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures—Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings. EN 1994-1-1

    Google Scholar 

  9. Menkulasi, F.: Horizontal shear connectors for precast prestressed bridge deck panels. MS Thesis (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kwak, H.G., Filippou, F.C.: Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures Under Monotonic Loading. Report No. UCB/SEMM-90/14. University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  11. Indian Standard 11384: Code of Practice for Composite Construction in Structural Steel and Concrete (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  12. IS456:2000 Part 1: Indian Standard Plain and Reinforced Concrete

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wallenfelsz, J.A.: Horizontal shear transfer for full-depth precast concrete bridge deck panels. MS Thesis, Blacksburg, Virginia (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kupfer, H., Hilsdorf, H.K., Rüsch, H.: Behavior of Concrete Under Biaxial Stresses (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Joseph, A.W., Wollmann, C.R.: Full-Depth Precast Concrete Bridge Deck Panel Systems. NCHRP Report 584. Transportation Research Board 2007 Executive Committee

    Google Scholar 

  16. PCI Design Handbook, 6th edn. (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Saemann, J.C., Washa, G.W.: Horizontal shear connections between precast beams and cast-in-place slabs. ACI J. 61(11), 1383–1409 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thanoon, W.A., Yardim, Y., Jaafar, M.S., Noorzaei, J.: Development of interlocking mechanism for shear transfer in composite floor. Constr. Build. Mater. 24, 2604–2611 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pong, W.A., Morgan Girgis, A.F.I., Tadros, M.K.: Proposed GFRP connectors in sandwich panels. ACI Spec. Publ. 230, 21–38 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hwang, S.-J.: Theory of interface shear capacity of reinforced concrete. J. Struct. Eng. 126, 700–707 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. R. Gowthami .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gowthami, N.R., Ramanjaneyulu, K., Ajaykumar Reddy, K. (2019). Ultimate Load Behaviour of Segmental Composite Slabs at Different Shear Connectors. In: Pujari, S., Srikiran, S., Subramonian, S. (eds) Recent Advances in Material Sciences . Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7643-6_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics