Carbon Balance and Emission Factor for the Cookstoves

  • Harshika KumariEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 36)


The main upshots from the fuel are heat and emissions. The aim is to get high thermal energy with low emission factors. The carbon balance and CO2 mitigation study have an important decision to play in energy planning. In this context, it is necessary to understand how the bioenergy can help in mitigation by considering its potential for carbon emission reduction and sequestration.


Biomass Cookstoves Carbon balance Greenhouse gas PIC 


  1. 1.
    Li XH, Duan L, Wang SX et al (2007) Emission characteristics of particle matter from rural household biofuel combustion in China. Energy Fuels 21:845–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu Y, Shao M, Fu LL, Lu SH, Zeng LM, Tang DG (2008) Source profiles of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) measured in China: part 1. Atmos Environ 42:6247–6260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baldwin S (1987) Biomass stoves. Volunteers in Technical Assistance, with Princeton University, Arlington, VAGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baldwin SF (1987) Biomass stoves: engineering design, development, and dissemination. Volunteers in Technical Assistance (VITA), Virginia, USA, p 287Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    WHO (2006) Fuel for life: household energy and health. Oxford University Press, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Smith KR, Rasmussen RA, Manegdeg F, Apte M (1992) Greenhouse gases from small-scale combustion in developing countries, EPA-600-R-92-005. Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ahuja DR (1990) Research needs for improving biofuel burning cookstove technologies. Nat Resour Forum 14:125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Crutzen RJ, Andreae MO (1990) Biomass burning in the tropics: impact on atmospheric chemistry and biochemical cycles. Science 250:1169–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee CM, Chandler C, Lazarus M, Johnson FX (2012) Assessing the climate impacts of cookstove projects: issues in emissions accounting. In: Working paper 2013-01. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Venkataraman C, Habib G, Eiguren-Fernandez A, Miguel AH, Friedlander SK (2005) Residential biofuels in South Asia: carbonaceous aerosol emissions and climate impacts. Science 307:1454–1456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smith KR, Uma R, Kishore VVN, Lata K, Madne S, Rao G, Zhang J, Rasmussen RA, Khalil MAK, Thorneloe SA (2003) Greenhouse gases from small-scale combustion devices in developing countries. Phase IIa: household stoves in India. U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smith KR, Ahuja DR (1990) Toward a greenhouse equivalence index: the total exposure analogy. Clim Change 17:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bailis R, Ogle D, MacCarty N, Still D, Smith KR, Edwards R (2007) The water boiling test (WBT) version 3.0. Shell Foundation, Household Energy and Health Programme 2003, revised, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smith KR, Uma R, Kishore VVN, Zhang J, Joshi V, Khalil MAK (2000) Greenhouse implications of household stoves: an analysis for India. Annu Rev Energy Environ 25:741–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    VITA (1985) Testing the efficiency of wood burning cookstoves. 1815N. Lynn Street, Suite 200, Arlington 22209 USAGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith KR (1987) Biofuels, air pollution, and health. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhu SL (2004) Study on emission factors of GHG and pollutants from rural stoves in developing countries. Renew Energy 2:16–19Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kumari H, Chandra A, Kaushik SC (2014) Comparative study on emissions from traditional and improved biomass cookstoves used in India. IJRASET 2:249–257Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kandpal JB, Maheshwari RC, Kandpal TC (1994) Air pollution from biomass combustion in domestic cookstove. Renew Energy 4:545–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ward DE, Nelson RM, Adams DF (1979) Forest fire smoke plume documentation. In: 72nd Annual meeting of the air pollution control association, Cincinnati, OhioGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ward DE, Hardy CC (1991) Smoke emissions from wildlife fires. Environ Int 17:117–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    TERI (1995) Environmental considerations and options in managing India’s long term energy strategy. Submitted to the United Nations Environment Programme, RISO Centre, Denmark. Tata Energy Research Institute, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Smith KR, Khalil A, Rasmussen RA et al (1993) Greenhouse gases from biomass and fossil fuel stoves in developing countries: a Manila pilot study. Chemosphere 26:479–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Smith KR, Dutta K (2011) Cooking with gas, editorial. Energy Sustainable Dev 15:115–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northern India Engineering CollegeNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations