Data-Driven Safety Model on Urban Rail Transit Signal System

  • Yujia ChenEmail author
  • Xiaoqing Zeng
  • Tengfei Yuan
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 127)


The signal system is the control system in the rail transit system and is a key component to realize the safety of train operation. As more signal systems use complex computer systems instead of traditional control methods, data plays an increasingly important role in the system’s work. Establishing an analytical model with data as a system unit is important for further strengthening system safety. This paper takes urban rail transit signal system as the research object, and builds a system safety model based on the data driving characteristics of the system, which provides theoretical support for further improving the safety of the new generation rail transit system.


Data-driven Signal system Safety model Urban rail transit 



The project is supported by Tongji University and the project “Research on the Practice and Improvement of the Construction Innovation Technology of Shanghai Rail Transit Line 17” (Number JS-KY18R022-7).


  1. 1.
    Farooq, J., Soler, J.: Radio communication for Communications-Based Train Control (CBTC): a tutorial and survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 19(3), 1377–1402 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gao, C.: Communication-based train control system. Modern Urban Transit (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Short, R.: Safety assurance of configuration data for railway signal interlockings. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on System Safety. IET (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harrison, A., Pierce, R.: Data management safety requirements derivation. Railtrack: West Coast Route Modernisation Internal report (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Littlewood, B., Popov, P., Strigini, L., et al.: Modelling the effects of combining diverse software fault detection techniques. In: Formal Methods and Testing, pp. 345–366. Springer (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leveson, N.G., Harvey, P.R.: Analyzing software safety. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 5, 569–579 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Faulkner, A., Nicholson, M.: An assessment framework for data-centric systems. In: Dale, C., Anderson, T. (eds.) Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Safety-Critical Systems Symposium, Brighton. Safety Critical Systems Club (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Faulkner, A., Storey, N.: The role of data in safety-related railway control systems. In: Proceedings of the 19th Systems Safety Conference, Huntsville (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Girija, S.S.: Tensorflow: large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Military Standard: Procedure for performing a failure mode effect and criticality analysis. United States military procedure MIL-P-1629 (1949)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang, H., Liu, S.: Modeling communications-based train control system: a case study. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Industrial Mechatronics and Automation (ICIMA). IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    61508-3-2010 I: Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems - Part 3: Software requirements. Basic Safety PublicationGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Recht, J.: Systems safety analysis: failure mode and effect. National Safety News (1966)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fenelon, P., McDermid, J.A.: Integrated techniques for software safety analysis. In: Proceedings of the IEE Colloquium on Hazard Analysis. IET (1992)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Patra, S.: Software safety assurance process for railway platform software. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on System Safety. IET (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Transportation EngineeringTongji UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations