Abstract
Research over the last decade has clarified that snakes are efficiently detected by adults, children, and even monkeys which have never seen a real or toy snake. Yet, despite several studies that have attempted to determine what characteristics of snakes attract the attention of humans and primates, no definitive proof has been obtained. The visible characteristics of snakes include their curvilinear shape, limblessness, triangular-shaped head (especially vipers), coloration, specific spatial frequencies, poses and postures, scales, and so on. Any of these could individually or in combination serve as triggers to indicate “snake.” This chapter investigates how each of these characteristic “clues” contributes to snake recognition. Since humans, monkeys, and other animals react strongly even when only a portion of a snake is visible, viewing only a part of a snake body may enable recognition. This is a reasonable conjecture considering that snakes conceal themselves when hunting prey. Our research on humans and monkeys has shown that there is speedier detection of snakes with scales than of other animals not dangerous for participants. Yet, when images were processed to remove the scales and present smooth surfaces, there was no longer immediate detection of a snake. While photographs of snakes with scales elicited stronger event-related brainwave potentials (ERPs) than did photos of birds, when the scales were removed, ERPs ranged in the intermediate area between those for birds and those for snakes with scales. This suggests that a key visual feature for snake recognition is their scales.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alorda C, Serrano-Pedraza I, Campos-Bueno JJ, Sierra-Vazquez V, Montoya P (2007) Low spatial frequency filtering modulates early brain processing of affective complex pictures. Neuropsychologia 45:3223–3233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.06.017
American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edn. American Psychiatric Publishing, Arlington
Amo L, Lopez P, Martin J (2004) Wall lizards combine chemical and visual cues of ambush snake predators to avoid overestimating risk refuges. Anim Behav 67:647–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.08.005
Anonymous (1940) Colour-blindness and camouflage. Nature 146:226
Arnold SJ, Bennett AF (1984) Behavioral variation in natural populations III: antipredator displays in the garter snake Thamnophis radix. Anim Behav 32:1108–1118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(84)90227-4
Batty MJ, Cave KR, Pauli P (2005) Abstract stimuli associated with threat through conditioning cannot be detected preattentively. Emotion 5:418–430. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.5.4.418
Brattstrom BH (1955) The coral snake “mimic” problem and protective coloration. Evolution 9:217–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1955.tb01533.x
Buffalo EA, Fries P, Landman R, Liang HL, Desimone R (2010) A backward progression of attentional effects in the ventral stream. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:361–365. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907658106
Cave KR, Batty MJ (2006) From searching for features to searching for threat: drawing the boundary between preattentive and attentive vision. Vis Cogn 14:629–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280500193107
Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (1981) Selective forces affecting the predator alarm calls of vervet monkeys. Behaviour 76:25–61. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853981X00022
Coelho CM, Cloete S, Wallis G (2010) The face-in-the-crowd effect: when angry faces are just cross(es). J Vis 10:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1167/10.1.7
Cole GG, Wilkins AJ (2013) Fear of holes. Psychol Sci 24:1980–1985. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613484937
Coss RG (2003) The role of evolved perceptual biases in art and design. In: Voland E, Grammer K (eds) Evolutionary aesthetics. Springer - Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 69–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07142-7_4
Coss RG, Ramakrishna U (2000) Perceptual aspects of leopard recognition by wild bonnet macaques (Macaca radiata). Behaviour 137:315–335. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853900502105
Crockford C, Wittig RM, Zuberbuhler K (2017) Vocalizing in chimpanzees is influenced by social-cognitive processes. Sci Adv 3:e1701742. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1701742
Etting SF, Isbell LA (2014) Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) use posture to assess level of threat from snakes. Ethology 120:1177–1184. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12293
Fernandez D, Wilkins AJ (2008) Uncomfortable images in art and nature. Perception 37:1098–1113. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5814
Gao X, LoBue V, Irving J, Harvey T (2017) The effect of spatial frequency information and visual similarity in threat detection. Cognit Emot 31:912–922. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1180280
Grassini S, Holm SK, Railo H, Koivisto M (2016) Who is afraid of the invisible snake? Subjective visual awareness modulates posterior brain activity for evolutionarily threatening stimuli. Biol Psychol 121:53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.10.007
Hayakawa S, Kawai N, Masataka N (2011) The influence of color on snake detection in visual search in human children. Sci Rep 1:80. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00080
He H, Kubo K, Kawai N (2014) Spiders do not evoke greater early posterior negativity in the event-related potential as snakes. Neuroreport 25:1049–1053. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000000227
Helfman GS (1989) Threat-sensitive predator avoidance in damselfish-trumpetfish interactions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:47–58
Horstmann G, Lipp OV, Becker SI (2012) Of toothy grins and angry snarls- open mouth displays contribute to efficiency gains in search for emotional faces. J Vis 12:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1167/12.5.7
Isbell LA (2006) Snakes as agents of evolutionary change in primate brains. J Hum Evol 51:1–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2005.12.012
Isbell LA (2009) The fruit, the tree, and the serpent. Why we see so well. University Press, New York
Isbell LA, Etting SF (2017) Scales drive detection, attention, and memory of snakes in wild vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus). Primates 58:121–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-016-0562-y
Kastner S, O’Connor DH, Fukui MM, Fehd HM, Herwig U, Pinsk MA (2004) Functional imaging of the human lateral geniculate nucleus and pulvinar. J Neurophysiol 91:438–437. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00553.2003
Kawai N, He H (2016) Breaking snake camouflage: humans detect snakes more accurately than other animals under less discernible visual conditions. PLoS One 11:e0164342. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.016432
Kawai N, Koda H (2016) Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata) quickly detect snakes but not spiders: evolutionary origins of fear-relevant animals. J Comp Psychol 130:299–303. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000032
Kawai N, Qiu H (in press) Humans detect snakes more accurately and quickly than other animals under natural visual scenes: a flicker paradigm study. Cognition and Emotion. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1657799
Kawai N, Kubo K, Masataka N, Hayakawa S (2016) Conserved evolutionary history for quick detection of threatening faces. Anim Cogn 19:655–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0949-y
Kawai N, Sun X, He H, Koda H, Terazawa T, Qiu H (in preparation) Scales of snakes are the key feature to drive superior snake detection in humans and monkeys
Lähteenmäki M, Hyönä J, Koivisto M, Nummenmaa L (2015) Affective processing requires awareness. J Exp Psychol Gen 144:339–365. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000040
Le AT, Cole GG, Wilkins AJ (2015) Assessment of trypophobia and an analysis of its visual precipitation. Q J Exp Psychol 68:2304–2322. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1013970
Livingstone MS (2000) Is it warm? Is it real? Or just low spatial frequency? Science 290:1299. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5495.1299b
LoBue V (2010) And along came a spider: an attentional bias for the detection of spiders in young children and adults. J Exp Child Psychol 107:59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecep.2010.04.005
LoBue V (2012) Perceptual biases for threat. In: Mills GW, Stone SJ (eds) Psychology of bias. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp 37–52
LoBue V (2014) Deconstructing the snake: the relative roles of perception, cognition, and emotion on threat detection. Emotion 14:701–711. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035898
LoBue V, DeLoache JS (2008) Detecting the snake in the grass: attention to fear-relevant stimuli by adults and young children. Psychol Sci 19:284–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02081.x
LoBue V, DeLoache JS (2010) Superior detection of threat-relevant stimuli in infancy. Dev Sci 13:221–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00872.x
LoBue V, DeLoache JS (2011) What’s so special about slithering serpents? Children and adults rapidly detect snakes based on their simple features. Vis Cogn 19:129–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2010.522216
Lythgoe JN, Partridge JC (1989) Visual pigments and the acquisition of visual information. J Exp Biol 146:1–20
Masataka N, Hayakawa S, Kawai N (2010) Human young children as well as adults demonstrate ‘superior’ rapid snake detection when typical striking posture is displayed by the snake. PLoS One 5:e15122. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015122
Morgan JJ, Adam A, Mollon JD (1992) Dichromats detect colour-camouflaged objects that are not detected by trichromats. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 248:291–295. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1992.0074
Morris JS, Öhman A, Dolan RJ (1999) A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating ‘unseen’ fear. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:1680–1685. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.4.1680
New J, Cosmides L, Tooby J (2007) Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise. PNAS 104(42):16598–16603. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703913104
Norman J, Ehrlich S (1987) Spatial frequency filtering and target identification. Vis Res 27:87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(87)90145-3
Öhman A (2007) Has evolution primed humans to “beware the beast”? Proc Natl Acad Sci:16396–16397. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707885104
Öhman A, Flykt A, Esteves F (2001) Emotion drives attention: detecting the snake in the grass. J Exp Psychol Gen 13:466–478. https://doi.org/10.1037/AXJ96-3445.130.3.466
Prokop P, Fančovičová J, Kučerová A (2018) Aposematic colouration does not explain fear of snakes in humans. J Ethol 36:35–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-017-0533-9
Rabosky ARD, Cox CL, Rabosky DL, Title PO, Holmes IA, Feldman A, McGuire JA (2016) Coral snakes predict the evolution of mimicry across New World snakes. Nat Commun 7:11484. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11484
Rakison DH, Derringer J (2008) Do infants possess an evolved spider-detection mechanism? Cognition 107:381–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.022
Rensink RA (2002) Change detection. Annu Rev Psychol 53:245–277. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135125
Rolls ET, Tovée MJ, Panzeri S (1999) The neurophysiology of backward visual masking: information analysis. J Cogn Neurosci 11:300–311. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892999563409
Rottenberg J, Ray RD, Gross JJ (2007) Emotion elicitation using films. In: Coan JA, Allen JJB (eds) Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 9–28
Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (2012) Animal cognition: chimpanzee alarm calls depend on what others know. Curr Biol 22:R51–R52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.11.050
Shibasaki M, Kawai N (2009) Rapid detection of snakes by Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata): an evolutionarily predisposed visual system. J Comp Psychol 123:131–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015095
Shibasaki M, Kawai N (2011) Visual searching for fear-relevant stimuli: snakes draw our attention more strongly than spiders do. Cogn Stud Bull Jpn Cogn Sci Soc 18:158–172. https://doi.org/10.11225/jcss.18,158
Simons DJ (2000) Attentional capture and inattentional blindness. Trends Cogn Sci 4:147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01455-8
Soares SC, Lindström B, Esteves F, Öhman A (2014) The hidden snake in the grass: superior detection of snakes in challenging attentional conditions. PLoS One 9:e114724. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114724
Struhsaker TT (1967) Auditory communication among vervet monkeys (Cerco- pithecus aethiops). In: Altmann SA (ed) Social communication among primates. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 281–324
Tamietto M, de Gelder B (2010) Neural bases of the non-conscious perception of emotional signals. Nat Rev Neurosci 11:697–709. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2889
Treisman AM, Gelade G (1980) A feature-integration theory of attention. Cogn Psychol 12:97–136
Van Le Q, Isbell LA, Matsumoto J, Nguyen M, Hori E, Maior RS, Tomaz C, Tran AH, Ono T, Nishijo H (2013) Pulvinar neurons reveal neurobiological evidence of past selection for rapid detection of snakes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:19000–19005. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312648110
Van Le Q, Isbell LA, Matsumoto J, Le QV, Hori E, Tran AH, Maior RS, Tomaz C, Ono T, Nishijo H (2014) Monkey pulvinar neurons fire differentially to snake postures. PLoS One 9:e114258. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114258
Van Strien JW, Isbell LA (2017) Snake scales, partial exposure, and the Snake Detection Theory: a human event-related potentials study. Sci Rep 7:46331. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep46331
Van Strien JW, Christiaans G, Franken IH, Huijding J (2016) Curvilinear shapes and the snake detection hypothesis: an ERP study. Psychophysiology 53:252–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12564
Villeneuve MY, Kupers R, Gjedde A, Ptito M, Casanova C (2005) Pattern-motion selectivity in the human pulvinar. NeuroImage 28:474–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.015
Vuilleumier P, Armony JL, Driver J, Dolan RJ (2003) Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions. Nat Neurosci 6:624–631. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1057
Weldon PJ (1982) Responses to ophiophagous snakes by snakes of the genus Thamnophis. Copeia 1982(4):788–794. https://doi.org/10.2307/1444088
Weldon PJ, Burghardt GM (1979) The ophiophage defensive response in crotaline snakes: extension to new taxa. J Chem Ecol 5:141–151
Willenbockel V, Sadr J, Fiset D, Horne GO, Gosselin F, Tanaka JW (2010) Controlling low-level image properties: the SHINE toolbox. Behav Res Methods 42:671–684. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.3.671
Wolfe JM, Yee A, Friedman-Hill SR (1992) Curvature is a basic feature for visual search tasks. Perception 21:465–480. https://doi.org/10.1068/p210465
Yorzinski JL, Penkunas MJ, Platt ML, Coss R (2014) Dangerous animals capture and maintain attention in humans. Evol Psychol 12:534–548. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8573p998
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kawai, N. (2019). Searching for the Critical Features of Snakes. In: The Fear of Snakes. The Science of the Mind. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7530-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7530-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7529-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7530-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)