Skip to main content

Comparisons and Contrasts Between Item Response Theory and Rasch Measurement Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Course in Rasch Measurement Theory

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Education ((SPTE))

  • 66k Accesses

Abstract

There are two approaches that can be taken with regards to a data–model relationship. The first and most common approach is that of item response theory (IRT), where the model describes the data. If the data do not fit the model, another model with more parameters is chosen. The second and less common approach is that of Rasch measurement theory, where the model is an operationalization of fundamental requirements of measurement. If the data do not fit the model, reasons for the misfit are investigated as anomalies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrich, D. (2004). Controversy and the Rasch model: A characteristic of incompatible paradigms? Medical Care,42(1), i7–i16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrich, D. (2011). Rating scales and Rasch measurement. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research,11(5), 571–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhart, C. (1983). Law of error I: Development of the concept. In S. Kotz & N. L. Johnson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistical sciences (Vol. 4, pp. 530–547). Toronto: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1961/1977). The function of measurement in modern physical science. ISIS, 52(2), 161–193. Reproduced in Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The essential tension. Chicago: The University Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G. (1960/1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Expanded edition (1980) with foreword and afterword by Wright, B. D. (Ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Reprinted (1993) Chicago: MESA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G. (1961). On general laws and the meaning of measurement in psychology. In J. Neyman (Ed.), Proceeding of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (Vol. 4, pp. 321–333). Berkeley, California: University of California Press. Reprinted in Bartholomew, D. J. (Ed.). (2006). Measurement: Sage benchmarks in social research methods (Vol. I, pp. 319–334). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1928). Attitudes can be measured. The American Journal of Sociology,33(4), 529–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1959). The measurement of values. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Andrich, D. (1989). Distinction between assumptions and requirements in the social sciences. In J. A. Keats, R. Taft, & S. H. Lovibond (Eds.), Proceedings of the XXIVth International Congress of Psychology, Mathematical and Theoretical Systems (Vol. 4, pp. 7–16). B.V. North Holland: Elsevier Science Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrich, D. (2018). Advances in social measurement: A Rasch measurement theory. In F. Guillemin, A. Leplège, S. Briançon, E. Spitz, & J. Coste (Eds.), Perceived health and adaptation in chronic disease: Stakes and future challenge (Chapter 7, pp. 66–91). Taylor and Francis: CRCS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1957). The Copernican revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific resolutions (2nd Enlarged ed.). Chicago: The University Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1954). The measurement of values. Psychological Review,61(1), 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Andrich .

Exercises

Exercises

  1. 1.

    Summarize, in no more than 200 words, the idea of a paradigm in research and in scientific research.

  2. 2.

    Summarize, in no more than 300 words, the distinction between the two approaches to measurement outlined in this chapter. Relate this distinction to the idea of paradigms of research and to how models are used in these two paradigms.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Andrich, D., Marais, I. (2019). Comparisons and Contrasts Between Item Response Theory and Rasch Measurement Theory. In: A Course in Rasch Measurement Theory. Springer Texts in Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7496-8_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7496-8_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7495-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7496-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics