Abstract
There are two approaches that can be taken with regards to a data–model relationship. The first and most common approach is that of item response theory (IRT), where the model describes the data. If the data do not fit the model, another model with more parameters is chosen. The second and less common approach is that of Rasch measurement theory, where the model is an operationalization of fundamental requirements of measurement. If the data do not fit the model, reasons for the misfit are investigated as anomalies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andrich, D. (2004). Controversy and the Rasch model: A characteristic of incompatible paradigms? Medical Care,42(1), i7–i16.
Andrich, D. (2011). Rating scales and Rasch measurement. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research,11(5), 571–585.
Eisenhart, C. (1983). Law of error I: Development of the concept. In S. Kotz & N. L. Johnson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistical sciences (Vol. 4, pp. 530–547). Toronto: Wiley.
Kuhn, T. S. (1961/1977). The function of measurement in modern physical science. ISIS, 52(2), 161–193. Reproduced in Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The essential tension. Chicago: The University Chicago Press.
Rasch, G. (1960/1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Expanded edition (1980) with foreword and afterword by Wright, B. D. (Ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Reprinted (1993) Chicago: MESA Press.
Rasch, G. (1961). On general laws and the meaning of measurement in psychology. In J. Neyman (Ed.), Proceeding of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (Vol. 4, pp. 321–333). Berkeley, California: University of California Press. Reprinted in Bartholomew, D. J. (Ed.). (2006). Measurement: Sage benchmarks in social research methods (Vol. I, pp. 319–334). London: Sage Publications.
Thurstone, L. L. (1928). Attitudes can be measured. The American Journal of Sociology,33(4), 529–554.
Thurstone, L. L. (1959). The measurement of values. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Further Reading
Andrich, D. (1989). Distinction between assumptions and requirements in the social sciences. In J. A. Keats, R. Taft, & S. H. Lovibond (Eds.), Proceedings of the XXIVth International Congress of Psychology, Mathematical and Theoretical Systems (Vol. 4, pp. 7–16). B.V. North Holland: Elsevier Science Publications.
Andrich, D. (2018). Advances in social measurement: A Rasch measurement theory. In F. Guillemin, A. Leplège, S. Briançon, E. Spitz, & J. Coste (Eds.), Perceived health and adaptation in chronic disease: Stakes and future challenge (Chapter 7, pp. 66–91). Taylor and Francis: CRCS Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1957). The Copernican revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific resolutions (2nd Enlarged ed.). Chicago: The University Chicago Press.
Thurstone, L. L. (1954). The measurement of values. Psychological Review,61(1), 47–58.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Exercises
Exercises
-
1.
Summarize, in no more than 200 words, the idea of a paradigm in research and in scientific research.
-
2.
Summarize, in no more than 300 words, the distinction between the two approaches to measurement outlined in this chapter. Relate this distinction to the idea of paradigms of research and to how models are used in these two paradigms.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Andrich, D., Marais, I. (2019). Comparisons and Contrasts Between Item Response Theory and Rasch Measurement Theory. In: A Course in Rasch Measurement Theory. Springer Texts in Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7496-8_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7496-8_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7495-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7496-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)