Skip to main content

Sustainable Public Procurement in Europe: Creating Markets or Distorting the Internal Market

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Open Markets, Free Trade and Sustainable Development
  • 375 Accesses

Abstract

In 2010, the European Commission communicated its vision for Europe in 2020: the 2020 strategy. In this strategy, the European Commission states the need for a smart, sustainable and inclusive economy. The 2020 strategy defines sustainable growth as the promotion of a more resource efficient, greener and more competitive economy. One of the tools to reach out for such sustainable growth is public procurement, in particular sustainable public procurement. Therefore, the 2020 strategy states that the European Commission will encourage wider use of sustainable public procurement. Public procurement should for example be used to reduce energy and resource use and to invest in energy efficiency in public buildings and in more efficient recycling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    CEPS and College of Europe (2012).

  2. 2.

    Brammer and Walker (2009).

  3. 3.

    World Commission on Environment and Development (1987).

  4. 4.

    Defra (2006).

  5. 5.

    Sustainable Procurement Platform (2016).

  6. 6.

    Preuss (2009).

  7. 7.

    Ibid.: 217f.

  8. 8.

    P. Aspers, Märkte (Springer VS 2015) 50.

  9. 9.

    R.H. Coase, The firm the market and the law (The University of Chicago Press 1988) 7f.

  10. 10.

    P. Aspers, Märkte (Springer VS 2015) 19.

  11. 11.

    Sarasvathy and Dew (2005).

  12. 12.

    Tinbergen (1965).

  13. 13.

    European Commission (2016a).

  14. 14.

    Kunzlik (2003).

  15. 15.

    European Commission, Green Paper, Public Procurement in the European Union: Exploring the way.

  16. 16.

    For the developments see Krämer (2013, 83ff).

  17. 17.

    ECJ Judgement, Concordia Bus Finland Oy Ab v Helsinginkaupunki, HKL-Bussiliikenne [2002] ECR2002 I-07213. The first judgement dealing with social criteria was the Beentjes Case, which also allowed for social considerations to some degree, ECJ judgement, Beentjes vs Netherlands State [1988] ECR 1988 I-04652.

  18. 18.

    Caranta (2010).

  19. 19.

    European Commission (2004).

  20. 20.

    European Commission (2016b).

  21. 21.

    European Commission (2010).

  22. 22.

    Burja (2009).

  23. 23.

    For the process see http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/gpp_criteria_process.htm accessed 19 September 2016.

  24. 24.

    See for example Article 5 of the Clean Vehicles Directive (2009/33/EC) or Article 6 of the Energy Star Regulation (106/2008).

  25. 25.

    One example is the debate between Kunzlik and Hettne, see Kunzlik (2013) and Hettne (2013).

  26. 26.

    Commission (2011a), 15 final.

  27. 27.

    Commission (2011b), 896 final.

  28. 28.

    Commission (n 27), 4.

  29. 29.

    Pitschas and Prieß (2000).

  30. 30.

    Arrowsmith and Kunzlik (2009, pp. 9–54).

  31. 31.

    Commission (n 27), p. 35ff.

  32. 32.

    Dragus and Neamtu (2014, 301ff).

  33. 33.

    The paragraph about clarifying is still in the new Directive para. 91.

  34. 34.

    Van der Abeele (2014).

  35. 35.

    Pauwelyn (2004).

  36. 36.

    European Commission (2011).

  37. 37.

    European Commission (2004, 23).

  38. 38.

    European Commission (2016b, 51).

  39. 39.

    ECJ Judgement, Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands (Dutch Coffee) [2012] ECR 2012-0000, para. 91.

  40. 40.

    ECJ Judgement, Concordia Bus Finland Oy Ab v Helsinginkaupunki, HKL-Bussiliikenne [2002] ECR2002 I-07213, para 52.

  41. 41.

    Dalhammer (2015).

  42. 42.

    Ibid.

  43. 43.

    Ibid.

  44. 44.

    The old Directive did not include this explicitly, however, it has been argued that even then the link to the subject matter was a requirement, see Krämer (2013); Opitz (2004).

  45. 45.

    ECJ Judgement, Bundesdruckerei vs. Dortmund, Case C-549/13.

  46. 46.

    ECJ Judgement, Regio Post vs Landau, C-115/14.

  47. 47.

    ECJ Judgement, Concordia Bus Finland Oy Ab v Helsinginkaupunki, HKL-Bussiliikenne [2002] ECR2002 I-07213.

  48. 48.

    Ibid., para. 59.

  49. 49.

    ECJ Judgement, EVN and Wienstrom [2003] ECR2003 I/14527, para 67–72.

  50. 50.

    ECJ Judgement, Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands (Dutch Coffee) [2012] ECR 2012-0000.

  51. 51.

    Ibid., para 82.

  52. 52.

    Ibid., para. 90.

  53. 53.

    For a critic on this concept see Semple (2014).

  54. 54.

    For the distinction government as purchaser and government as regulator see, Arrowsmith and Kunzlik (2009, 9, 21ff). This distinction is also common in US procurement law and is called the “market-participant doctrine”. Regarding this see Krämer (2014).

  55. 55.

    Caranta (2015).

References

  • Arrowsmith, S., & Kunzlik, P. (2009). Public procurement and horizontal policies in EC law: General principles. In S. Arrowsmith & P. Kunzlik (Eds.), Social and environmental policies in EC procurement law: New directives and new directions. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., & Walker, H. (2009). Sustainable procurement in the public sector: An international comparative study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 452–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burja, A. (2009). Using green public procurement (GPP) for sustainable consumption and production. Journal of European Environmental and Planning Law, 319, 328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caranta, R. (2010). Sustainable public procurement in the EU’ in Roberto Caranta and Martin Trybus. In The law of green and social procurement in Europe (p. 15, 27). DJØFPublishing Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caranta, R. (2015). The changes to the public contract directives and the story they tell about how EU law works. Common Market Law Review, 391, 397.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEPS and College of Europe. (2012). The uptake of green public procurement in the EU27. Report. Submitted to the European Commission (2012). http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/studies_en.htm. Accessed September 19, 2016.

  • Commission. (2011a). Green paper on the modernisation of EU public procurement policy towards a more efficient European procurement market.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission. (2011b). Proposal for a directive of the European parliament and of the council on public procurement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalhammer, C. (2015). The application of ‘life cycle thinking’ in european environmental law: Theory and practice. Journal for European Environmental and Planning Law, 97–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defra. (2006). Procuring the future—The sustainable procurement task force national action plan (p. 10). London: DEFRA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dragus, D. C., & Neamtu, B. (2014). Sustainable public procurement in the EU: Experiences and prospects. In F. Lichere, R.Caranta, & S. Treumer (Eds.), Novelties in the 2014 directive on public procurement (301 ff). DJØF Publishing Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2004). Buying green, a handbook on green public procurement (1 ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2010). Buying social, a guide to taking account of social considerations in public procurement.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2011). Buying green, a handbook on green public procurement (2nd ed., p. 28).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2016a). Public Procurement. https://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/public-procurement_en. Accessed, September 19, 2016.

  • European Commission. (2016b). Buying green, a handbook on green public procurement (3rd ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettne, J. (2013). Strategic use of public procurement—Limits and opportunities. European Policy Analysis, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahlenborn et al. (2011). Strategic use of public procurement in Europe. http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/publicprocurement/docs/modernising_rules/strategic-use-public-procurement-europe_en.pdf. Final Report to the European Commission MARKT/2010/02/C. Accessed, May 7, 2019.

  • Krämer, R. (2013). Die Koordinierung zwischen Umweltschutz und Freihandel im Mehrebenenrechtsverbund am Beispiel des Vergaberecht. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krämer, R. (2014). Trade and environment: Diagonal conflicts in WTO, EU and U.S. procurement law. Jean Monnet Working paper 13/14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunzlik, P. (2003). Making the market work for the environment: Acceptance of (some) ‘green’ contract award criteria in public procurement. Journal of Environmental Law, 175–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunzlik, P. (2013). Green public procurement—European law, environmental standards and “what to buy” decisions’. Journal of Environmental Law, 173–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opitz, M. (2004). Das Legislativpaket—Die neuen Regelungen zur Berücksichtigung umwelt-und sozialpolitischer Belange bei der Vergabe öffentlicher Aufträge (p. 421, 425). VergabeR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauwelyn, J. (2004). Recent books on trade and environment: Gatt phantoms still haunt the WTO’. European Law Journal, 575–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitschas, C., & Prieß, H.-J. (2000). Secondary policy criteria and their compatibility with EC and WTO procurement law—The case of the German scientology declaration. Public Procurement Law Review, 171–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preuss, L. (2009). Addressing sustainable development through public procurement: The case of local government. Supply Chain Management: An international Journal, 213, 217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S. D., & Dew, N. (2005) New market creation through transformation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 15, 533, 536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semple, A. (2014). The link to the subject-matter: A glass ceiling for sustainable public contracts. Working Paper. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2565051. Accessed May 7, 2019.

  • Sustainable Procurement Platform. (2016). http://www.sustainable-procurement.org/about-spp/. Accessed September 19, 2016.

  • Tinbergen, J. (1965). International economic integration (2nd ed, 76 ff). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Abeele, E. (2014). Integrating social and environmental dimensions in public procurement: One small step for the internal market, one giant leap for the EU? ETUI Working Paper 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). From one earth to one world: An overview. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rike Krämer-Hoppe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Krämer-Hoppe, R. (2019). Sustainable Public Procurement in Europe: Creating Markets or Distorting the Internal Market. In: Singh, M., Cremer, W., Kumar, N. (eds) Open Markets, Free Trade and Sustainable Development. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7426-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7426-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7425-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7426-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics