Abstract
Educational robotics is a promising tool for bringing excitement, motivation, and growth of mathematics and other STEAM skills into the classroom. This paper presents the preliminary results of the pilot experimental study that was conducted in Estonia in the spring of 2018. The goal of the study was to clarify how educational robots can be used as learning tools in mathematics lessons, and what the teachers’ and students’ attitudes toward educational robots are. The study involved 10 classes in an experimental group (A) and 10 classes in a control group (B). In group A, robots were used as tools in visualizing numbers, results, shapes, distances, calculations, etc., and in group B, the lessons were carried out in a traditional way. The paper presents the results of the pilot study and discusses the pros and cons of using robots in math education.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Available at: http://bit.ly/2FkVYuS.
- 2.
Available at: http://bit.ly/2MGhxL5.
- 3.
Available at: http://bit.ly/2K4t0Ws.
References
Alimisis, D.: Educational robotics: open questions and new challenges. Themes Sci. Technol. Educ. 6(1), 63–71 (2013)
EBSCO Discovery Service: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs). https://help.ebsco.com/interfaces/EBSCO_Discovery_Service/EDS_FAQs/can_I_view_Web_of_Science_results_when_searching_EDS. Last accessed 13 Mar 2018
Europa Science: EBSCO Discover Service/Web of Science. https://www.researchinformation.info/product/ebsco-discovery-service-web-science (2010). Last accessed 13 Mar 2018
Gerretson, H., Howes, E., Campbell, S., Thompson, D.: Interdisciplinary mathematics and science education through robotics technology: its potential for education for sustainable development (a case study from the USA). J. Teach. Educ. Sustain. 10(1), 32–41 (2008)
Greene, J.C., Caracelli, V.J., Graham, W.F.: Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 11(3), 255–274 (1989)
Highfield, K.: Robotic toys as a catalyst for mathematical problem solving. Aust. Prim. Math. Classroom 15(2), 22–27 (2010)
Highfield, K., Mulligan, J., Hedberg, J.: Early mathematics learning through exploration with programmable toys. In: Figueras, O., Cortina, J.L., Alatorre, S., Rojano, T., Sepulveda, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of PME 32 and PME-NA Xxx, vol. 3, pp. 169–176 (PME Conference Proceedings). Cinvestav-UMSNH, Mexico (2008)
Holgersson, T., Lindh, J.: Does lego training stimulate pupils’ ability to solve logical problems? Comput. Educ. 49, 1097–1111 (2007)
Hussain, S., Lindh, J., Shukur, G.: The effect of LEGO training on pupils’ school performance in mathematics, problem solving ability and attitude: Swedish data. Educ. Technol. Soc. 9(3), 182–194 (2006)
Iturrizaga, I.M.: Study of Educational Impact of the LEGO Dacta Materials—INFOESCUELA-MED. Final Report. http://www.edukamalta.com/services/files/catalogues/Case%20Study%20-INFOESCUELA%20%E2%80%93%20MED%20Study].pdf (2000). Last accessed 13 Mar 2018
Khan, K.S., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J., Antes, G.: Five steps to conducting a systematic review. J. R. Soc. Med. 96(3), 118–121 (2003)
Khanlari, A.: Teachers’ perceptions of using robotics in primary/elementary schools in Newfoundland and Labrador. Masters Thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland. http://research.library.mun.ca/8068/1/thesis.pdf (2014). Last accessed 13 Mar 2018
Kopcha, T.J., McGregor, J., Shin, S., Qian, Y., Choi, J., Hill, R., Mativo, J., Choi, I.: Developing an integrative STEM curriculum for robotics education through educational design research. J. Form. Des. Learn. 1(1), 31–44, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-017-0005-1 (2017)
Logo Foundation: Logo History. http://el.media.mit.edu/logo-foundation/what_is_logo/history.html (2015). Last accessed 13 Mar 2018
Matson, E., DeLoach, S., Pauly, R.: Building interest in math and science for rural and underserved elementary school children using robots. J. STEM Educ. Innov. Res. 5(3/4), 35–46 (2004)
OECD: Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection. OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264239555-en (2015)
OECD: Enabling the Next Production Revolution: the Future of Manufacturing and Services—Interim Report. OECD Publishing (2016)
Ortiz, A.M.: Examining students’ proportional reasoning strategy levels as evidence of the impact of an integrated LEGO robotics and mathematics learning experience. J. Technol. Educ. 26(2) (2015)
Papert, S.: Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books. ISBN 0-465-04627-4 (1980)
Paula, A.N.A., Rodarte, M.: Robótica Como Auxílio À Aprendizagem Da Matemática : Percepções De Uma Professora Do Ensino Fundamental Público. http://repositorio.ufla.br/handle/1/4623 (2014). Last accessed 13 Mar 2018
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L., De Jong, T., et al.: Phases of inquiry-based learning: definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educ. Res. Rev. European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), 14, 47–61 (2015)
Prensky, M.: Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On Horiz. 9(5), 1–6 (2001)
Rasinen, A., Virtanen, S., Endepohls-Ulpe, M., et al.: Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ. 19, 367 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-009-9097-5
Resnick, M.: Honoring Seymour Papert. The LEGO Foundation. http://www.legofoundation.com/nl-nl/newsroom/articles/2016/honoring-seymour-papert (2016). Last accessed 13 Mar 2018
Ribeiro, C., Coutinho, C., Costa, M.F.: Educational robotics as a pedagogical tool for approaching problem solving skills in mathematics within elementary education. In: 6th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI 2011), pp. 1–6 (2011)
Samuels, P.: Motivating mathematics learning through an integrated technology enhanced learning environment. Int. J. Technol. Math. Educ. 17(4), 197–203 (2010)
Samuels, P., Haapasalo, L.: Real and virtual robotics in mathematics education at the school-university transition. Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol. 43(3), 285–301 (2012)
Savard, A., Freiman, V.: Investigating complexity to assess student learning from a robotics-based task. Digit. Exp. Math. Educ. 2(2), 93–114 (2016)
Savard, A., Highfield, K.: Teachers’ talk about robotics: where is the mathematics? In: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. https://www.merga.net.au/documents/RP2015-60.pdf (2015). Last accessed 13 Mar 2018
Silk, E.M., Higashi, R., Shoop, R., Schunn, C.D.: Designing technology activities that teach mathematics. Technol. Teach. 69(4), 21–27. http://www.lrdc.pitt.edu/schunn/research/papers/silk-etal-techteach2010.pdf (2009). Last accessed 13 Mar 2018
UNESCO Institute for Statistics: International Standard Classification of Education ISCED. http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/international-standard-classification-of-education-isced-2011-en.pdf (2011). Last accessed 13 Mar 2018
Walker, W.S.: Integrated STEm or integrated STEM? Sch. Sci. Math. 117(6), 225–227 (2017)
Williams, K., Igel, I., Poveda, R., Kapila, V., Iskander, M.: Enriching K-12 science and mathematics education using LEGOs. Adv. Eng. Educ. 3(2) (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Leoste, J., Heidmets, M. (2019). The Impact of Educational Robots as Learning Tools on Mathematics Learning Outcomes in Basic Education. In: Väljataga, T., Laanpere, M. (eds) Digital Turn in Schools—Research, Policy, Practice. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7361-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7361-9_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7360-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7361-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)