Skip to main content

Globalisation of Ayurveda: Importance of Scientific Evidence Base

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Ayurveda, one of the world’s oldest medical systems, is popular or is gaining popularity not only in South Asia but globally, especially for preventing and managing chronic diseases. However, strong concerns remain about the sub-optimal management and care of many people, arising from the unacceptable usage of non-evidence-based Ayurvedic interventions. One of the major hurdles in the globalisation of Ayurveda is its poor scientific evidence base and there is a strong need for robustly designed pragmatic studies. Research studies on Ayurvedic interventions should include a range of pathways to impact (such as user involvement and the involvement of key stakeholders) and communication plans (for academic and non-academic audiences). These studies have the potential to directly benefit people (patients and the public), health policymakers and managers (of public and private healthcare providers), Ayurveda practitioners and academics. Thus, research studies on Ayurvedic interventions have the potential to impact the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aslam M, Shaw J. A case study: dangers of transcultural medicine in the U.K. J Clin Pharm Ther. 1995;20(6):345–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bagley HJ, Short H, Harman NL, Hickey HR, Gamble CL, Woolfall K, et al. A patient and public involvement (PPI) toolkit for meaningful and flexible involvement in clinical trials: a work in progress. Res Involv Engagem. 2016;2:15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes J, McLachlan AJ, Sherwin CM, Enioutina EY. Herbal medicines: challenges in the modern world. Part 1. Australia and New Zealand. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2016;9(7):905–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhamra SK, Slater A, Howard C, Johnson M, Heinrich M. The use of traditional herbal medicines amongst South Asian diasporic communities in the UK. Phytother Res. 2017;31(11):1786–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhishagratna KL. English translation of Sushruta Samhita. Varanasi, India: Choukhamba Orientalia; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush TM, Rayburn KS, Holloway SW, Sanchez-Yamamoto DS, Allen BL, Lam T, et al. Adverse interactions between herbal and dietary substances and prescription medications: a clinical survey. Altern Ther Health Med. 2007;13(2):30–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhary A, Singh N. Intellectual property rights and patents in perspective of Ayurveda. Ayu. 2012;33(1):20–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhury RR. Herbal medicine for human health. New Delhi, India: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Southeast Asia; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst E. Heavy metals in traditional Indian remedies. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;57(12):891–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnier JJ, Boon H, Rochon P, Moher D, Barnes J, Bombardier C, et al. Reporting randomised, controlled trials of herbal interventions: an elaborated CONSORT statement. Ann Intern Med. 2006a;144(5):364–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnier J, Boon H, Rochon P, Barnes J, Moher D, Bombardier C, et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials evaluating herbal interventions: implementing the CONSORT statement [corrected]. Explore (NY). 2006b;2(2):143–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnier JJ, Boon H, Rochon P, Moher D, Barnes J, Bombardier C, et al. Recommendations for reporting randomised controlled trials of herbal interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006c;59(11):1134–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Job KM, Kiang TK, Constance JE, Sherwin CM, Enioutina EY. Herbal medicines: challenges in the modern world. Part 4. Canada and United States. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2016;9(12):1597–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kales SN, Saper RB. Ayurvedic lead poisoning: an under-recognized, international problem. Indian J Med Sci. 2009;63(9):379–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karri SK, Saper RB, Kales SN. Lead encephalopathy due to traditional medicines. Curr Drug Saf. 2008;3(1):54–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katoch D, Sharma JS, Banerjee S, Biswas R, Das B, Goswami D, et al. Government policies and initiatives for development of Ayurveda. J Ethnopharmacol. 2017;197:25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch E, Braithwaite R. A review of the clinical and toxicological aspects of ‘traditional’ (herbal) medicines adulterated with heavy metals. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2005;4:769–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MRC. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. London, UK: MRC; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murthy S. English translation of Astanga Hridaya. Varanasi, India: Choukhamba Orientalia; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patwardhan B. Bridging Ayurveda with evidence-based scientific approaches in medicine. EPMA J. 2014;5(1):19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh U, Joseph K, Renganathan R. Ayurvedic health tourism in Kerala: a study on the market potential catering to customer perceptions. i-manager’s Journal on Management. 2010;4(4):55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao KD, Shahrawat R, Bhatnagar A. Composition and distribution of the health workforce in India: estimates based on data from the National Sample Survey. WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2016;5(2):133–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy V, Gupta M, Ghosh RK. Perception, attitude and usage of complementary and alternative medicine among doctors and patients in a tertiary care hospital in India. Indian J Pharmacol. 2015;47(2):137–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudra S, Kalra A, Kumar A, Joe W. Utilization of alternative systems of medicine as health care services in India: evidence on AYUSH care from NSS 2014. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0176916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sammons HM, Gubarev MI, Krepkova LV, Bortnikova VV, Corrick F, Job KM, et al. Herbal medicines: challenges in the modern world. Part 2. European Union and Russia. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2016;9(8):1117–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar PK, Chaudhari S, Chattopadhyay A. Concept of interactions between consumable substances in Ayurveda with special reference to foods and drugs. Drug Metabol Drug Interact. 2013;28(3):147–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma H, Chandola HM, Singh G, Basisht G. Utilization of Ayurveda in health care: an approach for prevention, health promotion, and treatment of disease. Part 1: Ayurveda, the science of life. J Altern Complement Med. 2007a;13(9):1011–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma H, Chandola HM, Singh G, Basisht G. Utilization of Ayurveda in health care: an approach for prevention, health promotion, and treatment of disease. Part 2: Ayurveda in primary health care. J Altern Complement Med. 2007b;13(10):1135–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma PV. English translation of Charaka Samhita. Varanasi, India: Choukhamba Orientalia; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan R, Sugumar VR. Spread of traditional medicines in India: results of National Sample Survey Organization’s perception survey on use of AYUSH. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med. 2017;22(2):194–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Staley K. Exploring impact: public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. Eastleigh, UK: INVOLVE; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teng L, Zu Q, Li G, Yu T, Job KM, Yang X, et al. Herbal medicines: challenges in the modern world. Part 3. China and Japan. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2016;9(9):1225–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warrell DA, Cox TM, Firth JD. Oxford textbook of medicine. 5th ed. New York, USA: Oxford University Press; 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaushik Chattopadhyay .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chattopadhyay, K. (2020). Globalisation of Ayurveda: Importance of Scientific Evidence Base. In: Sen, S., Chakraborty, R. (eds) Herbal Medicine in India. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7248-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7248-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7247-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7248-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics