Abstract
The Green Revolution was a huge success especially in cereals and had a tremendous impact on food production, socioeconomic conditions, and environmental sustainability. However, this success story seemed incomplete since Green Revolution created islands of prosperity in vast stretches of low productive areas. To mitigate this problem, participatory plant breeding was conceived and extensive work carried out in this new field. PPB is extremely advantageous in those geographic areas where classical breeding efforts have been less successful and failed to leave a positive impact on farmers’ conditions. PPB can be resorted to for multiple uses like increasing productivity, preserving diversity and benefits for specific end users. However, most of these goals are not mutually compatible leading to trade-offs when any one option is given priority. Participatory approaches have certain limitations when compared to the conventional breeding methodologies especially the cost that is sometimes exorbitant and lead to selection of conventional methods as way of improvement. Thus, it is important that one should have total clarity regarding the objective of participatory research as to whether it is being used for improving the efficiency of agricultural research or merely being used as a tool for empowering farmers or partner organizations. Plant breeding institutions need to focus on the functional components of participatory breeding along with the empowerment of intermediate/partner organizations rather than the direct empowerment of large numbers of farmers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Bellon MR, Berthaud J, Smale M, Aguirre JA, Taba S, Aragon F, Dıaz J, Castro H (2003) Participatory landrace selection for on-farm conservation: an example from the Central Valleys of Oaxaca, Mexico. Genet Resour Crop Evol 50:401–416
Biggs SD (1988) Resource poor farmer participation in research: a synthesis of experiences from nine national agricultural research systems, OFCOR comparative study paper no. 3. ISNAR, The Hague
Bocci R (2011) Seed legislation and agrobiodiversity: conservation varieties. J Agric Environ Int Dev 103:31–49
Christinck A, von Brocke K, Kshirsagar KG, Weltzien E, Bramel-Cox PJ (1997) Participatory method for collecting germplasm: experiences with farmers in Rajasthan, India. Plant Genet Res Newslett 121:1–9
Delmer DP (2005) Agriculture in the developing world: connecting innovations in plant research to downstream applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:15739–15746
Dixon J, Gulliver A, Gibbon D (2001) Farming systems and poverty: improving farmers’ livelihoods in a changing world. FAO, Rome
Evenson RE, Gollin D (2003) Assessing the impact of the Green Revolution, 1960 to 2000. Science 300:758–762
Gabriel J, Herbas J, Salazar M, Ruiz J, LĂłpez J, Villarroel J, Cossio D (2004) Participatory plant breeding: a new challenge in the generation and appropriation of potato varieties by farmers in Bolivia. PRGA/CGIAR/FundaciĂłn PROINPA, Cali
Hardon J, Norbu U, Nguyen S, Luangkhot N (2005) Evaluation report of the biodiversity use and conservation in Asia programme (BUCAP). NORAD, Oslo
Hellin J, Bellon MR, Badstue DJ, Rovere RLA (2008) Increasing the impact of participatory research. Exp Agric 44:81–95
Khush GH (2001) Green revolution: the way forward. Nat Rev Genet 2:815–822
Lilja N, Bellon MR (2006) Analysis of participatory research projects in the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center. CIMMYT, Mexico
Louwaars NP (2018) Plant breeding and diversity: a troubled relationship? Euphytica 214:114
Maurya DM, Bottrall A, Farrington J (1988) Improved livelihoods, genetic diversity and farmer participation: a strategy for rice breeding in rainfed area of India. Exp Agric 24:311–320
Salazar R, Louwaars NP, Visser B (2006) Protecting farmers’ new varieties: new approaches to rights on collective innovations in plant genetic resources. World Dev 35:1515–1528
Smolders H (2006) Enhancing farmers’ role in crop development: framework information for participatory plant breeding in farmer field schools. Centre for Genetic Resources, Wageningen
Weltzien E, Smith ME, Meitzner LS, Sperling L (2003) Technical and institutional issues in participatory plant breeding- from the perspective of formal plant breeding. A global analysis of issues, results and current experience. CGIAR Systemwide Program on Participatory Research and Gender Analysis for Technology Development and Institutional Innovation. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bhargava, A., Srivastava, S. (2019). Future of Participatory Plant Breeding. In: Participatory Plant Breeding: Concept and Applications. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7119-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7119-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7118-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7119-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)