Advertisement

Development of a Ground Subsystem Prototype for Ground-Based Augmentation System (GBAS) Approach Service Type D (GAST-D) and the Evaluation of Its Performance in a Low Magnetic Latitude Region

  • T. YoshiharaEmail author
  • S. Saito
  • A. Kezuka
  • K. Hoshinoo
  • S. Fukushima
  • S. Saitoh
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 555)

Abstract

A ground-based augmentation system (GBAS) is a navigation system using global navigation satellite system (GNSS) that enables precision approaches and landing for aircraft. In May 2010, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Navigation Systems Panel (NSP) working group completed development baseline standards and recommended practices (SARPs) for GBAS ground subsystems to support GBAS approach service type D (GAST-D), which refers to Category III precision approach services using the single-frequency L1-C/A signal. The Electronic Navigation Research Institute (ENRI) developed a prototype of the GAST-D ground subsystem to operationally validate the development baseline SARPs. Owing to the fact that ionospheric delays with large spatial gradients represent one of the most significant risks to the integrity of the GAST-D operation, the system was installed in a low magnetic latitude region where plasma bubble causes steep spatial gradients in the ionospheric delay. Preliminary results were reported to the NSP working group before the development baseline SARPs were approved in December 2016 with an expectation that they would go into effect in 2018. Here, we report the development of a prototype for a GAST-D ground subsystem to validate the development baseline SARPs and preliminarily evaluate the system’s performance.

Keywords

GNSS Landing system Safety system design Ionospheric delay Precision approach 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors deeply thank Japan Civil Aviation Bureau, Okinawa prefecture, Ishigaki city for their cooperation for the installation and operation of ENRI’s GAST-D prototype in New Ishigaki airport.

References

  1. 1.
    Christie J, Ko§ P, Pervan B, Enge P, Powell JD, Parkinson B, Shan C (1998) Analytical and experimental observations of ionospheric and tropospheric decorrelation effects for differential satellite navigation during precision approach. In: Proceedings of the ION GPS 1998 Nashville, TN, pp 739–747Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Luo M, Pullen S, Walter T, Enge P (2004) Ionospheric spatial gradient threat for LAAS: mitigation and tolerable threat space. In: Proceedings of the ION NTM 2004, San Diego, CA, pp 490–501Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Luo M, Pullen S, Ene A, Qiu D, Walter T, Enge P (2004) Ionosphere threat to LAAS: updated model, user impact, and mitigations. In: Proceedings of the ION GNSS 2004, Long Beach, CA, pp 2771–2785Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee J, Luo M, Pullen S, Park YS, Enge P, Brenner M (2006) Position-domain geometry screening to maximize LAAS availability in the presence of ionosphere anomalies. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS 2006. Fort Worth, TX, pp 393–408Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ramakrishnan S, Lee J, Pullen S, Enge P (2008) Targeted ephemeris decorrelation parameter inflation for improved LAAS availability during severe ionosphere anomalies. In: Proceedings of ION NTM 2008, San Diego, CA, pp 354–366Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee J, Seo J, Park Y, Pullen S, Enge P (2011) Ionospheric threat mitigation by geometry screening in ground-based augmentation systems. J Aircraft 48(4), 1422–1433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ene A, Qiu D, Luo M, Pullen S, Enge P (2005) A comprehensive ionosheric storm data analysis method to support LAAS threat model development. In: Proceedings of ION NTM 2005. San Diego, CA, pp 110–130Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pullen S, Park YS, Enge P (2009) Impact and mitigation of ionospheric anomalies on ground-based augmentation of GNSS. Radio Sci 44, RSOA21.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2008rs004084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fukushima S, Kudo M, Saitoh S, Yoshihara T, Saito S, Fujita S, Fujii N (2011) Development and Safety assurance of satellite-based precision approach and landing system. IEICE J94–B(7), 802–811 (Japanese)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ICAO/NSP WGW May 2010 Report—Attachment G, NSP May 10/Flimsy 29, “Development Baseline SARPs Proposal”, Presented by Tim Murphy and Stefan NaerlichGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yoshihara T, Saito S, Kezuka A, Hoshinoo K, Fukushima S, Saitoh S (2015) Development and validation of a CAT-III GBAS (Ground-based Augmentation System) prototype for magnetic low latitude region. In: Proceedings of the 56th aircraft symposium, 2G02 (JSASS-2015–5145), Matsuyama-shi (Japanese)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    GNSS-Based Precision Approach Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS) Signal-in-Space Interface Control Document (ICD), RTCA/ DO-246D, December 16, 2008Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Minimum operational performance standards for GPS local area augmentation system airborne equipment, RTCA/DO-253C, December 16, 2008Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Certification considerations for highly-integrated or complex aircraft systems, SAE ARP4754, November 1996Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guidelines and methods for conducting the safety assessment process on civil airborne systems and equipment, SAE ARP4761, December 1996Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yoshihara T, Murashi F, Saito S, Hoshinoo K (2015) A study on integrity improvement of GBAS ground subsystem using CSAC (Chip Scale Atomic Clock). In: Proceedings of ION ITM 2015, Dana point, CA, pp 593–599Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yoshihara T, Motoyoshi H, Sato T, Yamaguchi S, Saito S (2013) GAST-D integrity risks of snow accumulation on GBAS reference antennas and multipath effects due to snow-surface reflection. In: Proceedings of ION ITM 2013, San Diego, CA, pp 112–120Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    ICAO/NSP WGW Nov 2009 Report—Attachment H, NSP Nov 09/Flimsy 6, “Conceptual Framework for the Proposal for GBAS to Support CAT III Operations”, Presented by CSG RapporteurGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Di Giovanni G, Radicella S (1990) An analytical model of the electron density profile in the ionosphere. Adv Space Res 10(11):27–30Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Radicella S, Zhang M (1995) The improved DGR analytical model of electron density height profile and total electron content in the ionosphere. Annali di Geofisica, 38(1):35–41Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Saito S, Yoshihara T, Kezuka A, Saitoh S, Fukushima S, Otsuka Y (2015) GAST-D flight experiment results with disturbed and quiet ionospheric conditions. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS + 2015, Tampa, FL, pp 1494–1499Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Saito S, Yoshihara T, Nakahara H (2015) Performance of GAST-D ionospheric gradient monitor studied with low latitude ionospheric disturbance data obtained in a real airport environment. In: Proceedings of ION Pacific PNT 2015, Honolulu, HI, pp 815–820Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lopez A (2008) LAAS/GBAS ground reference antenna with enhanced mitigation of ground multipath. In: Proceedings of ION NTM 2008, San Diego, CA, pp 389–393Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Yoshihara
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. Saito
    • 1
  • A. Kezuka
    • 1
  • K. Hoshinoo
    • 1
  • S. Fukushima
    • 1
  • S. Saitoh
    • 1
  1. 1.Navigation Systems DepartmentElectronic Navigation Research Institute (ENRI)TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations