Advertisement

Interoperability of the ENRI GAST-D Ground-Station Prototype with Different Airborne Software Implementations

  • S. SaitoEmail author
  • M. Stanisak
  • T. Yoshihara
  • T. Feuerle
  • A. Lipp
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 555)

Abstract

Ground-based augmentation system (GBAS) interoperability trials were conducted in Ishigaki, Japan in June 2016. The interoperability of different implementations of GBAS airborne equipment/software including the TriPos from TU Braunschweig, a software from ENRI, and the Pegasus software developed by EUROCONTROL were tested with an experimental GAST-D ground prototype developed by ENRI and manufactured by NEC. Some differences were observed in protection levels, likely because of differences in the software tools’ satellite selection strategies. Even so, the position solutions and course deviations were in good agreement between the different implementations, so that interoperability was demonstrated successfully.

Keywords

Ground-Based augmentation system (GBAS) GBAS approach service Type-D (GAST-D) Interoperability Low latitude ionosphere 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work presented in this paper was funded by EUROCONTROL in scope of contracts between EUROCONTROL and TU Braunschweig. The experiment in Ishigaki, Japan was supported technically by Japan Civil Aviation Bureau.

References

  1. 1.
    ICAO NSP Flimsy 17 (2016) Proposed Amendment to International Standards and Recommended Practices, Aeronautical Telecommunications, Annex 10 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. Volume I (Radio Navigation Aids), Montreal, Canada, November-December, 2016Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ICAO (2010) GBAS CAT II/III Development Baseline SARPsGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yoshihara T, Saito S, Kezuka A, Fukushima S, Saitoh S (2017) Development of a CAT-III GBAS (GAST-D) ground subsystem prototype and its performance evaluation with a long term-data set. In: Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on ATM/CNS (EIWAC2017), November 2017Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saito S, Yoshihara T, Kezuka A, Saitoh S, Fukushima S, and Otsuka Y (2015) GAST-D flight experiment results with disturbed and quiet ionospheric conditions. Proc. ION GNSS + 2015, 1494–1499Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Feuele T, Stanisak M. Saito S, Yoshihara T (2016) GBAS interoperability trials and multi-constellation/multi-frequency ground mockup evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 6th SESAR innovation days, EUROCONTROL. ISSN 0770-1268Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Feuele T, Stanisak M, Saito S, Yoshihara T (2017) GBAS interoperability and multi-constellation/multi-frequency trials. In: Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on ATM/CNS (EIWAC2017), November 2017Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    RTCA/DO-253D (2017) Minimum operational performance standards for GPS local area augmentation system airborne equipment. July 13, 2017Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ICAO NSP Flimsy 10 (2016) Conceptual framework for the proposal for GBAS to support CAT III operations. Montreal, Canada, November–December, 2016Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saito S, Vernez K, Yoshihara T, and Kezuka A (2014) Performance improvement of GAST-D Airborne monitor algorithms under disturbed ionospheric conditions. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS + 2014, pp 815–821Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Saito
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Stanisak
    • 2
  • T. Yoshihara
    • 1
  • T. Feuerle
    • 2
  • A. Lipp
    • 3
  1. 1.Navigation Systems DepartmentElectronic Navigation Research Institute (ENRI)TokyoJapan
  2. 2.Institute of Flight GuidanceTechnische Universität Braunschweig (TU-BS)BraunschweigGermany
  3. 3.EUROCONTROL Experimental CenterBretigny-sur-OrgeFrance

Personalised recommendations