Abstract
‘Arts and Culture Nodes’ is an initiative launched by Singapore’s National Arts Council (NAC) in 2012 to bring quality arts closer to where people live, foster regular arts engagement, enrich public life and build stronger community bonds. The key mechanism employed was not only creating a comprehensive network of partnerships with artists and various neighbourhood institutions, such as community and recreational clubs, libraries and non-profit organisations across the island, but also activating a range of neighbourhood public spaces as more informal arts and culture venues. This chapter first outlines the research conducted in five Singaporean neighbourhoods to investigate spatial, social and participation impacts of the ‘Nodes’ initiative. Guided by the ‘Neighbourhood Arts and Culture Impact Assessment’ (NACIA) framework and the conceptual lenses of placemaking and cultural ecology, this chapter then discusses the roles and capacities of arts and culture initiatives in building sustainable community arts development and resilient local urban communities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For instance, the number of participants may depend on type of an arts event and the spatial capacity of an event venue (small-scale vs. large-scale, intimate vs. mass event). While it might somewhat indicate the event’s success, it may not be a fair indicator of an impact, although it may influence the perception of place vibrancy, for example.
- 2.
Due to Singapore’s tropical climate characterised by high air temperature, sun exposure, humidity and rainfall levels (especially during the rainy season in December and January), the protection from such harsh weather conditions is an important factor that affects the use of open public spaces and, therefore, their suitability for as arts and culture venues.
- 3.
The concept of sustainable development, developed in the late 1980s, initially proposed three key pillars of sustainability, namely: economic growth, social inclusion and environmental balance (United Nations General Assembly 1987). Although advocated since the early 2000s, United Cities and Local Governments in 2010 for the first time proposed culture as the fourth pillar of sustainable development, which is now widely accepted.
References
Artscape (2016a) Approaches to creative placemaking. http://www.artscapediy.org/Creative-Placemaking/Approaches-to-Creative-Placemaking.aspx. Accessed 20 Apr 2018
Artscape (2016b) Place matters. D.I.Y. Creative placemaking. http://www.artscapediy.org/Creative-Placemaking/Place-Matters.aspx. Accessed 20 Apr 2018
Belfiore E, Bennett O (2010) Beyond the “toolkit approach”: arts impact evaluation research and the realities of cultural policy-making. J Cult Res 14(2):121–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/14797580903481280
Brown AS, Novak-Leonard JL (2013) Measuring the intrinsic impacts of arts atten-dance. Cult Trends 22(3–4):223–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2013.817654
Carmona M, Health T, Oc T, Tiesdell S (2010) Public places urban spaces: the dimensions of urban design. Elsevier, Amsterdam; Oxford
Carnwath JD, Brown AS (2014) Understanding the value and impacts of cultural experiences: a literature review. Arts Council England. https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/download-file/Understanding_the_Value_and_Impacts_of_Cultural_Experiences.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2018
Centre for Liveable Cities (2017) Urban systems studies: a city of culture: planning for the arts. Centre for Liveable Cities, Singapore
Cho IS, Heng CK, Trivic Z (2016) Re-framing urban space: urban design for emerging hybrid and high-density conditions. Routledge, New York
Dunphy K (2015) A holistic framework for evaluation of arts engagement. In: Macdowall L, Badham M, Blomkamp EM, Dunphy K (eds) Making culture count: the politics of cultural measurement. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 243–263
Dwyer L, Mellor R, Mistilis N, Mules T (2000) A framework for assessing ‘tangible’ and ‘intangible’ impacts of events and conventions. Event Manag 6:175–189. https://doi.org/10.0000/096020197390257
Gehl J (1987) Life between buildings: using public space. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
Gehl J, Svarre B (2013) How to study public life. Island Press, Washington; Covelo; London
GovHK (2015) Hong Kong planning standards and guidelines: Chapter 3 community facilities. Planning Department, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. http://www.pland.gov.hk/pland_en/tech_doc/hkpsg/full/ch3/ch3_text.htm#9. Accessed 20 Apr 2018
Grannis R (2009) From the ground up: translating geography into community through neighbour. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Greasley P (2008) Quantitative data analysis using SPSS: an introduction for health and social science. McGraw-Hill/Open University Press, Maidenhead; New York
Hetland L, Winner E (2001) The arts and academic achievement: what the evidence shows. Arts Educ Policy Rev 102(5):3–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632910109600008
Holden J (2004) Capturing cultural value: how culture has become a tool of government policy. Demos, London
James P, with Magee L, Scerri A, Steger MB (2015) Urban sustainability in theory and practice: circles of sustainability. Routledge, London
Kagan S (2007) Art and sustainability: connecting patterns for a culture of complexity. Transcript Verlag, Bielefeld
Keeney KP, Korza P (2015) Assessing arts-based social change endeavors: controversies and complexities. In: Stephenson MO, Tate AS (eds) Arts and community change: exploring cultural development policies, practices and dilemmas. Routledge, New York and London, pp 186–211
Lee J, Sim JL (2016) Arts-based community engagement in Singapore: success stories, challenges, and the way forward. In: Hersey LN, Bobick B (eds) Handbook of research on the facilitation of civic engagement through community art. IGI Global, pp 391–411
Lim B (2014) Rethinking community arts in Singapore. J Theatrex Asia 1(1):15–22
Low F (2015) Community cultural development—why construct an Asia perspective? In: Low F (ed) Art with communities: practices and possibilities. Partridge Publishing, Singapore
Markusen A, Gadwa A (2010) Creative placemaking. Markusen Economic Research Services and Metris Arts Consulting, Washington. https://www.arts.gov/sites/default/files/CreativePlacemaking-Paper.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2018
Matarasso F (1997) Use or ornament: the social impact of participation in the arts. Comedia, Stroud. http://www.culturenet.cz/res/data/004/000571.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2018
McCarthy KF, Ondaatje EH, Zakaras L, Brooks A (2004) Gifts of the muse reframing the debate about the benefits of the arts. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2005/RAND_MG218.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2018
Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth (MCCY) (2012) The report of the arts and culture strategic review. MCCY, Singapore. https://www.nac.gov.sg/dam/jcr:1b1765f3-ff95-48f0-bbf9-f98288eb7082. Accessed 20 Apr 2018
MCCY (2016) An active citizenry through sports and broadening access through arts and heritage. MCCY, Singapore. https://www.mccy.gov.sg/news/speeches/2016/Apr/active-citizenry-through-sports-and-broadening-access-through-arts-heritage.aspx. Accessed 20 Apr 2018
Ministry of Information and the Arts (MITA) (2000) Renaissance city report: culture and the arts in renaissance Singapore. MITA, Singapore. https://www.nac.gov.sg/dam/jcr:defaf681-9bbb-424d-8c77-879093140750. Accessed 20 Apr 2018
Ministry of Information, Communications and the Arts (MICA) (2005) Renaissance city plan II. MICA, Singapore. https://www.nac.gov.sg/dam/jcr:c6cbd326-a895-4d28-b91b-a0b8ae715878. Accessed 20 Apr 2018
MICA (2008) Renaissance city plan III. MICA, Singapore. https://www.nac.gov.sg/dam/jcr:18cf2883-7907-4938-9931-384333e210ce. Accessed 20 Apr 2018
National Arts Council (NAC) (2014) More community arts and culture nodes bring the arts to the heartlands. NAC, Singapore. https://www.nac.gov.sg/media-resources/press-releases/More-Community-Arts-and-Culture-Nodes.html. Accessed 20 Apr 2018
NAC (2015) Population survey on the arts. NAC, Singapore. https://www.nac.gov.sg/dam/jcr:9a606902-09d8-4505-b880-92e5da253de6. Accessed 20 Apr 2018
NAC (2017) Enjoy year-round arts programmes at NAC’s Community Arts and Culture Nodes. NAC, Singapore. https://www.nac.gov.sg/media-resources/press-releases/NAC-Community-Arts-and-Culture-Nodes.html. Accessed 20 Apr 2018
NAC (2018) Engaging the public. NAC, Singapore. https://www.nac.gov.sg/whatwedo/engagement/artsforall.html. Accessed 18 June 2018
Pollock VL, Paddison R (2014) On place-making, participation and public art: the Gorbals, Glasgow. J Urban: Int Res Placemaking Urban Sustain 7(1):85–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2013.875057
Project for Public Spaces (2013) All placemaking is creative: how a shared focus on place builds vibrant destinations. https://www.pps.org/article/placemaking-as-community-creativity-how-a-shared-focus-on-place-builds-vibrant-destinations. Accessed 20 Apr 2018
Ritchie J, Spencer L (1994) Analysing qualitative data. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG (eds) Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. Routledge, London, pp 173–194
Shaftoe H (2008) Convivial urban spaces: creating effective public places. Earthscan, Sterling; London
Silberg S, Lorah K, Disbrow R, Muessig A (2013) Places in the making: how placemaking builds places and communities. MIT Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts. https://dusp.mit.edu/sites/dusp.mit.edu/files/attachments/project/mit-dusp-places-in-the-making.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2018
Soini K, Birkeland I (2014) Exploring the scientific discourse of cultural sustainability. Geoforum 51:213–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.12.001
Stern MJ (2014) Measuring the outcomes of creative placemaking. In: The role of artists and the arts in creative placemaking, 30–31 May 2014, Baltimore, MD—Symposium Report. Goethe-Institut and EUNIC, Washington DC, pp 84–97. http://www.goethe.de/ins/us/was/pro/creative_placemaking/2014_Symposium_Report.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2018
Stern MJ, Seifert SC (2009) Civic engagement and the arts: issues of conceptualization and measurement. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. https://animatingdemocracy.org/sites/default/files/CE_Arts_SternSeifert.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2018
Stuckey HL, Nobel J (2010) The connection between art, healing, and public health: a review of current literature. Am J Public Health 100(2):254–263. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2008.156497
Taylor DG (2008) Magnetizing neighborhoods through amateur arts performance. Urban Inst. https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/32131/411784-Magnetizing-Neighborhoods-through-Amateur-Arts-Performance.PDF. Accessed 20 Apr 2018
United Cities and Local Governments (2010) Culture: fourth pillar of sustainable development. http://www.agenda21culture.net/sites/default/files/files/documents/en/zz_culture4pillarsd_eng.pdf. Accessed 22 Nov 2018
United Nations (2017) New urban agenda. http://habitat3.org/wp-content/uploads/NUA-English.pdf. Accessed 22 Nov 2018
United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the world commission on environment and development: our common future. United Nations. http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm. Accessed 22 Nov 2018
Wood EH (2009) An impact evaluation framework: local government community festivals. Event Manag 12:171–185. https://doi.org/10.3727/152599509789659768
Acknowledgements
The author would like to express his appreciation to Beng Kiang Tan, Nina Mascarenhas, Quyen Duong, and Rita Padawangi for their invaluable contribution to this project.
Research project “Arts and Culture Nodes in the Heartlands of Singapore: Exploring Strategies, Spatial Opportunities and Impacts (Phase 2)” (R-294-000-061-490) discussed in this chapter, was conducted at the Centre for Sustainable Asian Cities (CSAC), School of Design and Environment (SDE), National University of Singapore (NUS), in collaboration with and funded by the National Arts Council (NAC), Singapore.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Trivic, Z. (2020). Bringing Arts Closer to Local Communities: Spatial Opportunities and Impacts on Community Bonding. In: Leong, CH., Malone-Lee, LC. (eds) Building Resilient Neighbourhoods in Singapore. Advances in 21st Century Human Settlements. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7048-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7048-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7047-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7048-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)