Skip to main content

Impact of Copyright Protection on Re-creation of Digital Contents When Expression and Idea Are Divisible

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 299 Accesses

Abstract

We consider the case in which the expression and the idea are completely divisible and copyright protection cannot be applied to very closely substitutable derivative work. Even if the ideas of these works are very similar, the substitute is regarded as an independent work, and not as a copyright infringement. Therefore, it is possible to supply closely substitutable goods based on similar ideas. Thus, the monopoly rent of the copyright holders might decrease, so they face the risk of failing to recover the initial cost. Assuming Bertrand competition with zero marginal cost, considering the nature of digital contents, we show that imitators have no incentive to enter the market in vertical product differentiation except in the case of a sufficiently high quality of imitation. Even if they can enter the product-differentiated market, they do not compete and divide the market to produce differentiated works. Thus, the original producer’s monopolistic profit is maintained under the general copyright system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, S. 1987. Spatial competition and price leadership. International Journal of Industrial Organization 5: 369–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arai, Y. 2018. Intellectual property right protection in the software market. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 27(1): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Aspremont, C., J. Jaskold Gabszewicz, and J.F. Thisse. 1979. On Hotelling’s stability in competition. Econometrica 47: 1145–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleckinger, Pierre and Thierry Lafay. 2003. Horizontal differentiation and price competition with sequential entry. mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling H. 1929. Stability in competition. The Economic Journal 39: 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loertscher, Simon and Gerd Muehlheusser. 2011. Sequential location games. The RAND Journal of Economics 42(4): 639–663 (Winter 2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Younies, Hassan, and H.A. Eiselt. 2011. Sequential Location Models H, 163–178. Foundations of Location Analysis Springer: A. Eiselt and Vladimir Marianov Edited.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takuya Nakaizumi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nakaizumi, T. (2019). Impact of Copyright Protection on Re-creation of Digital Contents When Expression and Idea Are Divisible. In: Hosoe, M., Ju, BG., Yakita, A., Hong, K. (eds) Contemporary Issues in Applied Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7036-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics