Advertisement

Cloud Detection in Landsat Imagery Using the Fractal Summation Method and Spatial Point-Pattern Analysis

  • Ling Han
  • Tingting WuEmail author
  • Zhiheng Liu
  • Qing Liu
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 980)

Abstract

Separation of clouds from snow and ice is fundamentally very challenging because these features display very similar spectral characteristics. To investigate how to improve the separation of these features using the fractal summation method and spatial point-pattern analysis, Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) images containing both cloud and snow/ice were used as a data source. Selective principal component analysis (SPCA) was applied to those bands sensitive to information regarding cloud and snow, and the fractal summation method and spatial point-pattern analysis were then applied. This innovative cloud detection method was found to be an effective tool for reducing non-cloud false anomalies in images where snow and ice share similar spectra with clouds.

Keywords

Remote sensing Cloud detection Snow/Ice Fractal summation method Hotspot analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the project of open fund for key laboratory of land and resources degenerate and unused land remediation, under Grant [SXDJ2017-7], and the 1:50, 000 geological mapping in the loess covered region of the map sheets: Caobizhen (I48E008021), Liangting (I48E008022), Zhaoxian (I48E008023), Qianyang (I48E009021), Fengxiang (I48E009022), & Yaojiagou (I48E009023) in Shaanxi Province, China, under Grant [DD-20160060].

References

  1. 1.
    Roy, David P., et al.: Web-enabled Landsat Data (WELD): Landsat ETM+ composited mosaics of the conterminous United States. Remote Sens. Environ. 114(1), 35–49 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhu, Z., Woodcock, C.E.: Automated cloud, cloud shadow, and snow detection in multitemporal Landsat data: An algorithm designed specifically for monitoring land cover change. Remote Sens. Environ. 152, 217–234 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kovalskyy, V., Roy, D.: A one year Landsat 8 conterminous United States study of cirrus and non-cirrus clouds. Remote Sens. 7, 564–578 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lyapustin, A., Wang, Y., Frey, R.: An automatic cloud mask algorithm based on time series of MODIS measurements. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos 13, 1–15 (2008) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Song, X., Liu, Z., Zhao, Y.: Cloud detection and analysis of MODIS image. In: Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. IGARSS 2004. Proceedings. 2004 IEEE International, vol. 4, pp. 2764–2767. IEEE (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Simpson, J.J., Gobat, J.I.: Improved cloud detection for daytime AVHRR scenes over land. Remote Sens. Environ. 55, 21–49 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dybbroe, Adam, Karlsson, Karl-Göran, Thoss, Anke: NWCSAF AVHRR cloud detection and analysis using dynamic thresholds and radiative transfer modeling. Part II: tuning and validation. J. Appl. Meteorol. 44, 55–71 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li, J., et al.: An Intercomparison of the spatiotemporal variability of satellite- and ground-based cloud datasets using spectral analysis techniques. J. Clim. 28(14), 150417113249008 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pal, S.K., Majumdar, T.J., Bhattacharya, A.K.: ERS-2 SAR and IRS-1C LISS III data fusion: a PCA approach to improve remote sensing based geological interpretation. Isprs J. Photogrammetry Remote Sens. 61(5), 281–297 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Allen Jr., R.C., Durkee, P.A., Wash, C.H.: Snow/cloud discrimination with multispectral satellite measurements. J. Appl. Meteorol. 29(10), 994–1004 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Feng, S.Y., et al.: Method of cloud detection with hyperspectral remote sensing image based on the reflective characteristics. Chin. Optics 8(2), 198–204 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cheng, Q.: The perimeter-area fractal model and its application to geology. Math. Geol. 27(1), 69–82 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen, G., Cheng, Q.: Singularity analysis based on wavelet transform of fractal measures for identifying geochemical anomaly in mineral exploration, Pergamon Press, Inc. (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brekke, C., Solberg, A.H.S.: Oil spill detection by satellite remote sensing. Remote Sens. Environ. 95(1), 1–13 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Feng, S.Y., et al.: Method of cloud detection with hyperspectral remote sensing image based on the reflective characteristics. Chin. Optics 8(2), 198–204 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Blenkinsop, T.: Scaling laws for the distribution of gold, geothermal, and gas resources. Pure Appl. Geophys. 172(7), 2045–2056 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhao, B., et al.: Internal structural analysis of geochemical anomaly based on the content arrangement method: a case study of copper stream sediment survey in northwestern Zhejiang Province. Geophys. Geochem. Explor. 39(2), 297–305 (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mitchel, A.: The ESRI Guide to GIS analysis, vol. 2: Spartial measurements and statistics, Esri Guide to Gis Analysis (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yunus, A.P., Dou, J., Sravanthi, N.: Remote sensing of chlorophyll- a as a measure of red tide in Tokyo Bay using hotspot analysis. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 2, 11–25 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Geology Engineering and GeomaticsChang’an UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Land Consolidation and RehabilitationChang’an UniversityXi’anChina
  3. 3.Track and Tunnel Branch Institute, Anhui Transport Consulting & Design Institute Co., Ltd.AnhuiChina

Personalised recommendations