Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Investigating the Role of Test Methods in Testing Reading Comprehension pp 31–49Cite as

Construct and Validity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 587 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter mainly discusses the concepts of construct, validity and validation. First, different views of construct are presented. Then the chapter focuses on the concept of validity and various theoretical underpinnings of test validation, including Messick’s validation framework, Kane’s interpretive argument framework, Bachman and Palmer’s assessment use argument (AUA for short) framework as well as multitrait-multimethod (MTMM for short) approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1960). The open system in personality theory. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61(3), 301–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1966). Traits revisited. American Psychologist, 21(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Educational Research Association. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, L. F., Davidson, F., & Foulkes, J. (1990). A comparison of the abilities measured by the Cambridge and Educational Testing Service EFL test batteries. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 30–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1982). The construct validation of some components of communicative proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 16(4), 449–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (2010). Language assessment in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, D. J., & Allen, A. (1974). On predicting some of the people some of the time: The search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior. Psychological Review, 81(6), 506–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapelle, C. A. (1998). Construct definition and validity inquiry in SLA research. In L. F. Bachman, & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research (pp. 32–70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duran, R. P. (1989). Testing of linguistic minorities. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 573–587). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farr, R., Pritchard, R., & Smitten, B. (1990). A description of what happens when an examinee takes a multiple-choice reading comprehension test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27(3), 209–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulcher, G. (2015). Re-examining language testing: A philosophical and social inquiry. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grotjahn, R. (1986). Test validation and cognitive psychology: Some methodological considerations. Language Testing, 3(2), 159–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1999). An enquiry concerning human understanding. T. L. Beauchamp (Ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. T. (1992). An argument-based approach to validity. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 527–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. T. (2001). Current concerns in validity theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38(4), 319–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. T. (2002). Validating high-stakes testing programs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 21(1), 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. T. (2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(1), 1–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos, & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Loevinger, J. (1957). Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. Psychological Reports, 3 (Monograph Supplement 9), 635–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, T. F., & Roever, C. (2006). Language testing: The social dimension. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W., & Peake, P. K. (1982). Beyond deja vu in the search for cross-situational consistency. Psychological Review, 89(6), 730–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mislevy, R. J. (1994). Evidence and inference in educational assessment. Psychometrika, 59(4), 439–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mislevy, R. J. (1996). Test theory reconceived. Journal of Educational Measurement, 33(4), 379–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P., Pullin, D., Gee, J., & Haertel, E. (2005). The idea of testing: Psychometric and sociocultural perspectives. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 3(2), 63–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, A. S., & Groot, P. J. M. (1981). An introduction. In A. S. Palmer, P. J. M. Groot, & G. A. Trosper (Eds.), The construct validation of tests of communicative competence (pp. 1–11). Washington: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1877). The fixation of belief. In E. C. Moore (Ed.), The essential writings of Charles S. Peirce (pp. 120–137). New York: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1965). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shohamy, E. (1996). Language testing: Matching assessment procedures with language knowledge. In M. Birenbaum, & F. J. R. C. Dochy (Eds.), Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning processes and prior knowledge (pp. 143–160). Boston: Kluwer/Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tryon, W. W. (1979). The test-trait fallacy. American Psychologist, 34(5), 402–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart, S., & Weir, C. J. (1998). Reading in a second language: Process, product and practice. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, C. J. (2005). Language testing and validation: An evidence-based approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Westen, D., & Rosenthal, R. (2003). Quantifying construct validity: Two simple measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 608–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitely, S. E. (1983). Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin, 93(1), 179–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China

    Jufang Kong

Authors
  1. Jufang Kong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jufang Kong .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kong, J. (2019). Construct and Validity. In: Investigating the Role of Test Methods in Testing Reading Comprehension. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7021-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7021-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7020-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7021-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation