Abstract
‘We are like sailors who on the open sea must reconstruct their ship but are never able to start afresh from the bottom. Where a beam is taken away a new one must at once be put there, and for this the rest of the ship is used as support. In this way, by using the old beams and driftwood the ship can be shaped entirely anew, but only by gradual reconstruction’ (Neurath & Cohen, 1973, p. 199). A research is by no means entirely new judged from every aspect but gradually built upon old knowledge. The following four chapters serve as a review of the important concepts of reading comprehension, validity, test method and mixed research methods in literature. This chapter mainly discusses the key theories of reading comprehension. After several influential theories and models of reading comprehension are outlined, the chapter examines the factors affecting reading comprehension process, namely, reader, text and the interaction between reader and text. The chapter ends with Khalifa and Weir’s model of reading comprehension based on which the current empirical study was carried out and the summary of this chapter.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1988). A Schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 37–55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barnett, M. A. (1986). Syntactic and lexical/semantic skill in foreign language reading: Importance and interaction. Modern Language Journal, 70(4), 343–349.
Barnett, M. A. (1988). Reading through context: How real and perceived strategy use affects L2 comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 72(2), 150–162.
Bernhardt, E. B. (1991). Reading development in a second language: Theoretical, empirical, and classroom perspectives. Norwood: Ablex.
Block, E. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 463–494.
Carrell, P. L., Devine, J., & Eskey, D. E. (1988). Interactive approaches to second language reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carrell, P. L., & Grabe, W. (2002). Reading. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 233–249). London: Edward Arnold.
Carver, R. P. (1997). Reading for one second, one minute, or one year from the perspective of rauding theory. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(1), 3–43.
Coady, J. (1979). A psycholinguistic model of the ESL reader. In R. Mackay, B. Barkman, & R. R. Jordan (Eds.), Reading in a second language: Hypothesis, organization and practice (pp. 5–12). Rowley: Newbury House.
Cohen, A. D., & Upton, T. A. (2006). Strategies in responding to the new TOEFL reading tasks (TOEFL Monograph Series Report No. 33). Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
Dechant, E. (1991). Understanding and teaching reading: An interactive model. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Enright, M. K., Grabe, W., Koda, K., Mosenthal, P., Mulcahy-Ernt, P., & Schedl, M. (2000). TOEFL 2000 reading framework: A working paper (TOEFL Monograph Series Report No. 17). Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
Fransson, A. (1984). Cramming or understanding? Effects of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on approach to learning and test performance. In J. C. Alderson, & A. H. Urquhart (Eds.), Reading in a foreign language (pp. 86–121). London: Longman.
Gagne, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1993). The cognitive psychology of school learning. New York: Harper Collins.
Gillan, D., & Barraza, P. (2006). A few seconds of equation reading: A process model of equation reading and its applications. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings, 50(11), 1152–1155.
Givon, T. (1993). Coherence in text, coherence in mind. Pragmatics & Cognition, 1(2), 171–227.
Goldman, S. R. (1997). Learning from text: Reflections on the past and suggestions for the future. Discourse Processes, 23(3), 357–398.
Goodman, K. S. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6(4), 126–135.
Goodman, K. S. (1988). The reading process. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 11–21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gough, P. B. (1972). One second of reading. In J. F. Kavanagh, & I. G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye: The relationship between speech and reading (pp. 331–358). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Louwerse, M. M. (2003). What do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository text? In A. P. Sweet, & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 82–98). New York: Guilford.
Hudson, T. (1996). Assessing second language academic reading from a communicative competence perspective: Relevance for TOEFL 2000 (TOEFL Monograph Series Report No. 4). Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329–354.
Khalifa, H., & Weir, C. J. (2009). Examining reading: Research and practice in assessing second language reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kintsch, W., & Rawson, K. A. (2005). Comprehension. In M. J. Snowling, & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 209–226). Oxford: Blackwell.
Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363–394.
Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Towards a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293–323.
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99(3), 440–466.
McNamara, T. F. (1996). Measuring second language performance. London: Longman.
Myers, J. L., & O’Brien, E. J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26(2–3), 131–157.
Neurath, M., & Cohen, R. S. (1973). Empiricism and sociology. Dordrecht: Springer.
O’Reilly, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). Reversing the reverse cohesion effect: Good texts can be better for strategic, high-knowledge readers. Discourse Processes, 43(2), 121–152.
Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2009). Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 228–242.
Pearson, P. D., & Johnson, D. D. (1978). Teaching reading comprehension. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Perfetti, C. A. (1997). Sentences, individual differences, and multiple texts: Three issues in text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 23(3), 337–355.
Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Reynolds, R. E., Taylor, M. A., Steffensen, M. S., Shirey, L. L., & Anderson, R. C. (1982). Cultural schemata and reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 17(3), 353–366.
Rouet, J. F., Vidal-Abarca, E., Erboul, A. B., & Millogo, V. (2001). Effects of information search tasks on the comprehension of instructional text. Discourse Processes, 31(2), 163–186.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance (Vol. 6, pp. 573–603). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1985). Toward an interactive model of reading. In H. Singer, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (3rd ed., pp. 722–750). Newark: International Reading Association.
Smith, F. (1978). Reading (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Towards an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16(1), 32–71.
Steensel, R. V., Oostdam, R., & Gelderen, A. V. (2013). Assessing reading comprehension in adolescent low achievers: Subskills identification and task specificity. Language Testing, 30(1), 3–21.
Steffensen, M. S. (1987). The effect of context and culture on children’s L2 reading: A review. In J. Devine, P. L. Carrell, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Research in reading in English as a second language (pp. 41–54). Washington: TESOL.
Symons, S., & Pressley, M. (1993). Prior knowledge affects text search success and extraction of information. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(3), 250–261.
Upton, T. A., & Lee-Thompson, L. (2001). The role of the first language in second language reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(4), 469–495.
Urquhart, S., & Weir, C. J. (1998). Reading in a second language: Process, product and practice. London: Longman.
van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., & Linderholm, T. (1999). The landscape model of reading: Inferences and the online construction of memory representation. In H. van Oostendorp, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 71–98). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Vidal-Abarca, E., & Sanjose, V. (1998). Levels of comprehension of scientific prose: The role of text variables. Learning and Instruction, 8(3), 215–233.
Weir, C. J. (2005). Language testing and validation: An evidence-based approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Weir, C. J., Yang, H., & Jin, Y. (2000). An empirical investigation of the componentiality of L2 reading in English for academic purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weir, C. J., Hawkey, R., Green, A., & Devi, S. (2009). The cognitive processes underlying the academic reading construct as measured by IELTS. British Council/IDP Australia IELTS Research Reports, 9, 157–189.
Williams, E., & Moran, C. (1989). Reading in a foreign language at intermediate and advanced levels with particular reference to English. Language Teaching, 22(4), 217–228.
Zou, S. (2004). An interactive approach to test validation: Re-examining the test usefulness of the TEM4 reading component. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Shanghai International Studies University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kong, J. (2019). Theories of Reading Comprehension. In: Investigating the Role of Test Methods in Testing Reading Comprehension. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7021-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7021-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7020-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7021-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)