Abstract
This research work was performed to understand the effect of bearing capacity of strip footing resting on reinforced and unreinforced Induction furnace slag with silty clay layer below. The parameters investigated to the study are H/B (Top granular layer thickness), u/B (location of the first layer of reinforcement to level of footing), h/B (vertical spacing between consecutive geogrid layers to width of footing) b/B (width of the geogrid layer to width of footing). The effect of different values of N and H/B ratios on bearing capacity ratio (BCR) and settlement reduction ratio (SRR) are also investigated. The model tank test is carried out on silty clay soil; the ultimate bearing pressure of the soil obtained is 221.33 kN/m2 at settlement of 98.45 mm. Induction slag is compacted at relative density of 60% and varying the H/B, u/B and h/B values (H/B = 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and h/B, u/B = 0.75, 0.5), model strip footing tests were performed on Induction furnace slag. The bearing pressure increases by 182% for H/B equal to 1.5 for Induction furnace slag compared with silty clay. The relative density is kept constant at 60% and H/B equal to 1.5 the geogrids are placed at interface and within the Induction slag layer (N = 1, 2, 3) and the tests were performed. The ultimate bearing pressure increases by 275%, 486% and 537% for N equal 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The BCR (bearing capacity ratio), SRR (settlement reduction ratio) and IF (improvement factor) are calculated for the same. The present research, the industrial waste products such as copper slag and induction furnace slag can be replaced with the conventional granular materials (gravel, sand) in highway subbase layer, reinforced earth walls as a structural fill and shall be used to improve the low bearing capacity areas.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams MT, Collin JG (1997) Large model spread footing load tests on geosynthetic reinforced soil foundations. Int J Geotech Geoenv Engg 123(1):66–72
Alawaji HA (2001) Settlement and bearing capacity of geogrid-reinforced sand over collapsible soil. Int J Geotext Geomem 19(2):75–88
EI Sawwaf M (2007) Behaviour of strip footing on geogrid reinforced sand over a soft clay slope. Int J Geotext Geomem 25(1):50–60
Gill KS, Choudhary AK, Jha JN, Shukla SK (2013) Large model footing load test on multi-layer reinforced coal ash slope. In: Geo-congress
Prasad PS, Ramana GV (2016) Feasibility study of copper slag as a structural fill in reinforced soil structures. Int J Geotext Geomem 44(6):623–640
Tripathi RK, Yadu L (2014a) Effect of depth and number of layers of reinforcement on bearing capacity ratio of the strip footing resting on granulated blast furnance slag reinforced with geogrid. In: Geo-congress
Tripathi RK, Yadu L (2014b). Effect on bearing capacity ratio of strip footing for various granular fill thickness and number of geogrid layers in granular fill overlay on soft soil. In: Geo-congress
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sudheer Kumar, J., Wadhwa, S. (2019). Influence of Strip Footing Resting on Geogrid Reinforced Induction Furnace Slag Beneath Silty Clay. In: Agnihotri, A., Reddy, K., Bansal, A. (eds) Environmental Geotechnology. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering , vol 31. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7010-6_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7010-6_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7009-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7010-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)