Skip to main content

‘Playing the PhD Game’ with integrity: An overview

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Playing the PhD Game with Integrity

Part of the book series: Understanding Teaching-Learning Practice ((UTLP))

Abstract

The notion of ‘playing the PhD game’ introduces the main focus of the book: on working towards success, with integrity, within the PhD system. The nature of integrity, a significant thread throughout the book, is unravelled. The main motivations behind writing the book are presented in terms of research integrity and standards of research practices and outcomes. The ways of working of key participants, such as candidates, supervisors and university managers, are central to achievement of goals within the PhD programme. Such behaviours, at both individual and collective levels, are key to ethical decision-making, progress towards success and the overall integrity of the PhD endeavour. The main tasks of the PhD challenge, seen through the lens of integrity, and what this means for coherence within all elements of the PhD game, are introduced. This chapter launches the key constructs of the book, in particular, our moral compass framework (MCF) for professional integrity. Notions of collective morality, decision-making when faced with ‘wicked’ problems, connected moral capability, as well as completion mindsets and contexts inform the practice-based elements of the book. What such notions mean for the conduct of doctoral research, research supervision, academic writing practices (PhD and publication), joint authorship and research training support systems are outlined (and developed in subsequent chapters). An overview of the key constructs within the book is presented as a map to guide the reader. Finally, the changing nature of the graduate research education landscape is presented, from the origins of the PhD to the increasingly complex context within which the PhD game is now played.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Australian Qualifications Framework. (2013). Retrieved January 23, 2018, from https://www.aqf.edu.au/aqf-levels.

  • Baillie, C., Bowden, J. A., & Meyer, J. E. (2013). Threshold capabilities: Threshold concepts and knowledge capability linked through variation theory. Higher Education, 65(2), 227–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, M. H., & Messick, D. M. (1996). Ethical leadership and the psychology of decision making. Sloan Management Review, 37(2), 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkun, S. (2012). The truth about choosing book titles. Writing well (December 04). Retrieved November 26, 2018, from http://scottberkun.com/2012/the-truth-about-picking-book-titles/.

  • Bowden, J. A. (2004). Capabilities-driven curriculum design. In C. Baillie & I. Moore (Eds.), Effective teaching and learning in engineering (pp. 36–47). London: Kogan Page.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, J. A., & Green, P. J. (2010a). Relationality and the myth of objectivity in research involving human participants. In J. Higgs, N. Cherry, R. Macklin, & R. Ajjawi (Eds.), Researching practice: A discourse on methodologies (pp. 105–112). The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, J. A., & Green, P. J. (2010b). The voice of the researched in qualitative research: Relationality and rigour. In J. Higgs, N. Cherry, R. Macklin, & R. Ajjawi (Eds.), Researching practice: A discourse on methodologies (pp. 123–132). The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, J. A., & Green, P. (2014). A moral compass framework for resolution of wicked problems in doctoral education and supervision. Quality Assurance in Education, 22(4), 255–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, J. A., & Marton, F. (2003). The university of learning: Beyond quality and competence (paperback edition). London: RoutledgeFalmer (Hardcover edition published in 1998 by Kogan Page).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, J., Hart, G., King, B., Trigwell, K., & Watts, O. (2000). Generic capabilities of ATN university graduates. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckwalter, J. A., Tolo, V. T., & O’Keefe, R. J. (2015). How do you know it is true? Integrity in research and publications. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 97, e2(1–8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambridge Dictionary. (2018). Play the game. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved February 8, 2018, from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/play-the-game.

  • Davidson, M. (2017). Vaccination as a cause of autism: Myths and controversies. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 19(4), 403–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. A., & Roy, S. (2017). Academic research in the 21st Century: Maintaining scientific integrity in a climate of perverse incentives and hypercompetition. Environmental Engineering Science, 34(1), 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elton, L. (2004). Goodhart’s law and performance indicators in higher education. Evaluation and Research in Education, 18, 120–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. (2003). Diminishing spaces: The supervision of research degree students in Australian universities. In R. Edwards & R. Usher (Eds.), Spatiality, curriculum and learning (pp. 157–172). Greenwood, CT: Westport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. (2005). Spaces of influence: A framework for analysis of an individual’s contribution within communities of practice. Higher Education Research and Development, 24(4), 293–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P., & Bowden, J. A. (2012). Completion mindsets and contexts in doctoral supervision. Journal of Quality Assurance in Education, 20(1), 66–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P., & Bowden, J. A. (2015). Moral compass framework: Decision-making in doctoral education scenarios. International Journal for Researcher Development, 8(1), 9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harig, B. (2007). Golf’s honor code limits ‘cheating’ incidents. ESPN: 10 August. Retrieved June 11, 2018, from http://www.espn.com.au/espn/cheat/columns/story?columnist=harig_bob&id=2964423.

  • Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue contingent model. The Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1973). The claim to moral adequacy of a highest stage of moral judgment. The Journal of Philosophy, 70(18), 630–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovat, T., Holbrook, A., Bourke, S., Fairbairn, H., Kiley, M., Paltridge, B., et al. (2015). Examining doctoral examination and the question of the viva. Higher Education Review, 47(3), 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manathunga, C. (2014). Intercultural postgraduate supervision: Reimaging time, place and knowledge. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manathunga, C. (2017). Intercultural doctoral supervision: The centrality of place, time and other forms of knowledge. Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, 16(1), 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (1993). Education and public policy in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, A., & Picard, M. Y. (2015). PhD, meet QPR: The quality in postgraduate research conference and the development of doctoral education. International Journal for Research Development, 6(1), 2–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2006). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Issues of liminality. In J. Meyer & R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 19–32). London and New York, NY: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, N., Bain, J. D., & Conrad, L. (2007). Orientations to research higher degree supervision. Higher Education, 53(2), 209–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering & Medicine. (2017). Fostering integrity in research. Washington: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, K. A. (1994). Changing doctoral degrees: An international perspective. London, UK: The Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Carroll, C. (2018). Research excellence in Europe: Key trends in PhD mobility & supporting early careers researchers. Coventry: The University of Warwick. Retrieved November 24, 2018, from https://www.jobs.ac.uk/media/pdf/recruiters/resources/free-report-research-excellence-in-europe.pdf.

  • Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York, NY: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, H., & Usher, R. (Eds.). (2000). Situated ethics in educational research. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, A. (2017). Ernie Els calls penalty on himself during BMW PGA Championship. Sky Sports 25 May. Retrieved June 11, 2018, from http://www.skysports.com/golf/news/12040/10892719/ernie-els-calls-penalty-on-himself-during-bmw-pga-championship.

  • TEQSA. (2018). Guidance Note: Research and Research Training Version 1.3. 5 July. Retrieved July 21, 2018, from https://www.teqsa.gov.au/latest-news/publications/guidance-note-research-and-research-training.

  • Thesaurus.com. (2018). Playing the game. Retrieved February 8, 2018, from http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/playing%20the%20game.

  • Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Group of Eight. (2013). The changing PhD: Discussion paper. Turner, ACT: Group of Eight House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, M. (2015). The Scribe guide to writing a perfect book title. The Writing Cooperative (July 24). Retrieved November 26, 2018, from https://writingcooperative.com/how-to-pick-the-perfect-title-for-your-book-59a5bf2d5ecd.

  • Universities Australia. (2013). An agenda for Australian higher education 2013–2016. Canberra, ACT: Universities Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Universities UK. (2016). Higher education facts and figures 2016. London (August). Retrieved November 24, 2018, from https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/facts-and-stats/data-and-analysis/Documents/facts-and-figures-2016.pdf.

  • Velasquez, M. G., & Rostankowski, C. (1985). Ethics: Theory and practice. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, A. J., Murch, S. H., Anthony, A., Linnell, J., Casson, D. M., Malik, M., Berelowitz, M., Dhillon, A. P., Thomson, M. A., Harvey, P., Valentine, A., Davies, S. E., & Walker-Smith, J. A. Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet, 351(9103), 637–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wingfield, N. (2017). The disappearing American grad student. The New York Times (03 Nov). Retrieved November 24, 2018, from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/03/education/edlife/american-graduate-student-stem.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John A Bowden .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bowden, J.A., Green, P.J. (2019). ‘Playing the PhD Game’ with integrity: An overview . In: Playing the PhD Game with Integrity. Understanding Teaching-Learning Practice. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6990-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6990-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6989-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6990-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics