Abstract
This chapter demonstrates how Singapore’s restrictions on LGBTQ uses of urban space demand an exploration of the interstitial material/digital spaces of the queer encounter. The online community ‘People Like Us’ (PLU) is contrasted with the popular bar ‘DYMK’ to suggest that in Singapore’s illiberal context, neither material ‘place’ nor cyberspace is sufficient for the formation of an anchored, visible LGBTQ public. This chapter therefore suggests that in illiberal contexts where LGBTQ rights are restricted, LGBTQ identity, networks, and socio-spatial relations exist and form in temporal ways in the liminal spaces between the built environment and cyberspace. The practices and negotiations in between are, themselves, a sort of tactical performance of identity and a reappropriation of space for the LGBTQ community.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Yale/NUS Liberal Arts College is a stand-alone joint venture between Yale University (USA) and faculty from the National University of Singapore, located adjacent to the National University of Singapore. It opened its doors to students in 2012.
References
Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2002). Cities: Reimagining the urban. London: Polity Press.
Anderson, E. (2011) The Cosmopolitan Canopy: Race and Civility in Everday Life. New York: Norton.
Arora, P. (2015). Facebook and the digital romance economy: Courtship, scams, and internet regulation in the global South. Impact of Social Sciences Blog. Retrieved February 4, 2017, from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/
Arora, P., & Scheiber, L. (2017). Slumdog romance: Facebook love and digital privacy at the margins. Media, Culture & Society, 39(3), 408–422.
Blackwell, C., Birnholtz, J., & Abbott, C. (2015). Seeing and being seen: Co-situation and impression formation using Grindr, a location-aware gay dating app. New Media & Society, 17(7), 1117–1136.
Bonner-Thompson, C. (2017). ‘The meat market’: Production and regulation of masculinities on the Grindr grid in Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK. Gender, Place & Culture, 24(11), 1–15.
Brown, G. (2008). Urban (homo) sexualities: Ordinary cities and ordinary sexualities. Geography Compass, 2(4), 1215–1231.
Browne, K., & Brown, G. (2016). An introduction to the geographies of sex and sexualities. In The Routledge research companion to geographies of sex and sexualities (pp. 1–12). Oxon: Routledge.
Chong, J. (2017). Ch. 8, LGBTQ activism in Singapore. In A history of human rights society in Singapore: 1965–2015 (p. 150). London: Taylor and Francis.
Chong, T. (Ed.). (2011). The AWARE Saga: Civil society and public morality in Singapore. Singapore: NUS Press.
Chua, L. (2012). Pragmatic resistance, law, and social movements in authoritarian states: The case of gay collective action in Singapore. Law & Society Review, 46(4), 713–748.
Cockayne, D. G., & Richardson, L. (2017a). A queer theory of software studies: Software theories, queer studies. Gender, Place & Culture, 24(11), 1587–1594.
Cockayne, D. G., & Richardson, L. (2017b). Queering code/space: The co-production of socio-sexual codes and digital technologies. Gender, Place & Culture, 24(11), 1–17.
Gandy, M. (2005). Cyborg urbanization: Complexity and monstrosity in the contemporary city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29, 26–49.
Goriunova, O. (2012). New media idiocy. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 19, 223–235.
Hanssen, B. (2004). Language and mimesis in Walter Benjamin’s work. In D. Ferris (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Walter Benjamin (pp. 54–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Henderson, N. J. (2017). ‘Top, bottom, versatile’: Narratives of sexual practices in gay relationships in the Cape Metropole, South Africa. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 20(5), 1–12.
Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2011). Code/space: Software and everyday life. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Lee, T. (2002). The politics of civil society in Singapore. Asian Studies Review, 26(1), 97–117.
Lefebvre, H. (1968). Le droit à la ville [The right to the city]. Paris: Anthropos.
Lodder, A. R. (2014). When ‘there’ can be everywhere: On the cross-border use of WhatsApp, Pandora, and Grindr. European Journal of Law and Technology, 5(2). Retrieved from http://ejlt.org/article/view/364/454
Luger, J. (2016). Singaporean ‘spaces of hope?’ Activist geographies in the city-state. City, 20(2), 186–203.
Merrifield, A. (2013). The politics of the encounter: Urban theory and protest under planetary urbanization (Vol. 19). Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Miles, S. (2017). Sex in the digital city: Location-based dating apps and queer urban life. Gender, Place & Culture, 24(11), 1–16.
Mohamed, M. S. (2015). Sexuality, development and non-conforming desire in the Arab world: The case of Lebanon and Egypt (No. IDS Evidence Report; 158). IDS.
Murray, S., & Ankerson, M. (2016). Lez takes time: Designing lesbian contact in geosocial networking apps. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 33(1), 53–69.
Ooi, C.-S. (2009). Government and creativity: ‘Arts City’ Singapore. Creative Industries, 3, 44–47.
Oswin, N. (2010). The modern model family at home in Singapore: A queer geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(2), 256–268.
Race, K. (2015). ‘Party and play’: Online hook-up devices and the emergence of PNP practices among gay men. Sexualities, 18(3), 253–275.
Rodan, G. (2003). Embracing electronic media but suppressing civil society: Authoritarian consolidation in Singapore. The Pacific Review, 16(4), 503–524.
Roth, Y. (2016). Zero feet away: The digital geography of gay social media. Journal of Homosexuality, 63(3), 437–442.
Sleeper, J. (2012, May 4). Yale has gone to Singapore, but can it come back? The Huffington Post. Retrieved from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/jim-sleeper/yale-has-gone-to-singapor_b_1476532.html
Szulc, L. (2014). The geography of LGBTQ internet studies. International Journal of Communication, 8, 5.
Tan, K. P. (Ed.). (2007). Renaissance Singapore? Economy, culture, and politics. Singapore: NUS Press.
Tan, K. P. (2008). Meritocracy and elitism in a global city: Ideological shifts in Singapore. International Political Science Review, 29(1), 7–27.
Tang, W., Best, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, F. Y., Tso, L. S., Huang, S., & Tucker, J. D. (2016). Gay mobile apps and the evolving virtual risk environment: A cross-sectional online survey among men who have sex with men in China. Sexually Transmitted Infections, sextrans-2015.
The Economist. (2018). Escalators to heaven: Evangelicalism is spreading among the Chinese of Southeast Asia, January 4.
Theroux, P. (1973). Saint Jack. London: Houghton Mifflin.
Visser, G. (2016). Sexualities and urban life. The Routledge research companion to geographies of sex and sexualities (p. 55). London: Routledge.
Yue, A. (2007). Hawking in the creative city: Rice rhapsody, sexuality and the cultural politics of ‘New Asia’ in Singapore. Feminist Media Studies, 7(4), 365–380.
Yue, A., & Zubillaga-Pow, J. (Eds.). (2012). Queer Singapore: Illiberal citizenship and mediated cultures (Vol. 1). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Luger, J. (2019). ‘Does Your Mother Know? Digital Versus Material Spaces of Queer Encounter in Singapore’. In: Nash, C.J., Gorman-Murray, A. (eds) The Geographies of Digital Sexuality. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6876-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6876-9_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6875-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6876-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)