Skip to main content

The Global Circulation of Affect: The Case of Iodide Tablets

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Traces of Fukushima

Abstract

This chapter examines the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster through circulation of affect in a hybrid media environment. Using the news coverage of potassium iodide tablet buying sprees in the Northern Hemisphere in March 2011 as its case study, this chapter examines how affect sticks and circulates in the news coverage, as areas outside Japan anticipated and speculated about the possible nuclear fallout from Fukushima Daiichi. The chapter introduces the notion of affective discipline and uses it to illustrate how distinct cultural tropes are used to manage circulation of affect during a crisis. Moreover, this chapter suggests that acts of affective discipline render visible the dual role of the public in crisis reporting: represented as panicky but addressed as rational.

Anna Rantasila is main writer of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.mercurynews.com/2011/03/14/so-far-very-low-risk-of-west-coast-contamination-from-japanese-nuclear-accident-experts-say-2/. Accessed 20 September 2018.

  2. 2.

    https://www.deseretnews.com/article/700119238/Panic-buying-triggered-by-nuke-crisis-sweeps-China.html. Accessed 20 September 2018.

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2004a). Affective economies. Social Text, 79(22), 117–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. (2004b). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. (2010a). Creating disturbance. Feminism, happiness and affective differences. In M. Liljeström & S. Paasonen (Eds.), Working with affect in feminist readings. Disturbing differences (pp. 31–44). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. (2010b). Happy objects. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 29–51). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J. C. (2012). Trauma. A social theory. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assmann, A., & Assmann, C. (2010). Neda – The career of a global icon. In A. Assmann & S. Conrad (Eds.), Memory in a global age. Discourses, practices and trajectories (pp. 225–242). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, S., & Lee, S. (2016). Crisis communication strategy on social media and the public’s cognitive and affective responses: A case of Foster Farms salmonella outbreak. Communication Research Reports, 33(4), 341–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, R., & Wu, H. D. (2010). Proposing emotion as a dimension of affective agenda setting: Separating affect into two components and comparing their second-level effects. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87(2), 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901008700206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, N. (2003). Media rituals: A critical approach. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203986608.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1086/229213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, M., & Seigworth, G. J. (2010). An inventory of shimmers. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 1–25). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2009). Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva, 47, 119–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, G., Elmer, G., McKelvey, F., & Deveraux, Z. (2009). Networked publics: The double articulation of code and politics on Facebook. Canadian Journal of Communication, 34(3), 415–434. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2009v34n3a2114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oikkonen, V. (2017). Affect, technoscience and textual analysis: Interrogating the affective dynamics of the Zika epidemic through media texts. Social Studies of Science, 47(5), 681–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631271772376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paasonen, S. (2015). A midsummer’s bonfire: Affective intensities of online debate. In K. Hillis, S. Paasonen, & M. Petit (Eds.), Networked affect (pp. 27–42). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantti, M., Wahl-Jorgensen, K., & Cottle, S. (2012). Disasters and the media. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papacharissi, Z. (2014). Affective publics. Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rantasila, A., Sirola, A., Kekkonen, A., Valaskivi, K., & Kunelius, R. (2018). #fukushima five years on: A multimethod analysis of Twitter on the anniversary of the nuclear disaster. International Journal of Communication, 12, 928–949. https://doi.org/1932–8036/20180005.

  • Riis, O., & Woodhead, L. (2010). A sociology of religious emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567607.001.0001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rost, K., Stahel, L., & Frey, B. S. (2016). Digital social norm enforcement: Online firestorms in social media. PLoS One, 11(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solove, D. J. (2007). The future of reputation: Gossip, rumor, and privacy on the internet. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumiala, J., Tikka, M., Huhtamäki, J., & Valaskivi, K. (2016). #JeSuisCharlie: Towards a multi-method study of hybrid media events. Media and Communication, 4(4), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v4i4.593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumiala, J., Valaskivi, K., Tikka, M., & Huhtamäki, J. (2018). Hybrid media events: The Charlie Hebdo attacks and global circulation of terrorist violence. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tarde, G. (1901). L’opinion et la foule. Paris: F. Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weart, S. R. (2012). The rise of nuclear fear. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M. (2015). Trends in the turn to affect: A social psychological critique. Body & Society, 21(2), 139–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X14539020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer, B., & Allan, S. (Eds.). (2011). Journalism after September 11 (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katja Valaskivi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Valaskivi, K., Rantasila, A., Tanaka, M., Kunelius, R. (2019). The Global Circulation of Affect: The Case of Iodide Tablets. In: Traces of Fukushima. Palgrave Pivot, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6864-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics