Abstract
A pollution monitoring study has been conducted to assess the extent of heavy metal/metalloid contamination in subsurface water in the neighbourhood of municipal solid waste (MSW) disposal site in Kolkata metropolitan city, India. On the basis of observed experimental data, the associated carcinogenic and non carcinogenic risks were quantitatively estimated. Water samples (n = 36) were collected and analysed for its toxic metal content by dynamic reaction cell inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (DRC-ICP-MS). The average concentration of metal μgL−1 in subsurface water is found as Cr-74.14, Mn-75.78, Pb-19.96, Fe-615.60, Ni-26.71, Co-5.13, Cu-16.33, Zn-750.50, As-42.03, Cd-3.80. The carcinogenic risk is articulated as the likelihood of cancer manifestation through exposure to site related pollutants. Among tested chemicals, arsenic is established to induce cancer in residents of study area. Cancer risk owing to ingestion and dermal exposure is 8.12E−04 and 4.32E−06 respectively. The total value of incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR) for resident is found as 8.16E−04. The cumulative hazard index for non carcinogenic risk (Σ HI = dermal and ingestion) for child (1.03E+01) and adult (6.21E+00) reveals that toxic risk is beyond tolerable limit (HQ > 1.00). Alarming values of such hazardous inorganic compounds addresses that there is a risk factor in all kinds of environmental receptors and concerning stake holders. The risk assessment data provides a rational tool for decision makers in corporation level to take up risk management strategies at the polluted site.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
He J, Charlet L (2013) A review of arsenic presence in China drinking water. J Hydrol 492:79–88
Leung CM, Jiao JJ (2006) Heavy metal and trace element distributions in groundwater in natural slopes and highly urbanized spaces in mid-levels area, Hong Kong. Water Res 40:753–767
Mohanraj R, Azeez PA, Priscilla T (2004) Heavy metals in airborne particulate matter of urban Coimbatore. Contam Toxicol 47:162–167
Zereini F, Alt F, Messerschmidt J, Wiseman C, Feldmann I, von Bohlen A, Muller J, Liebl K, Puttmann W (2005) Concentration and distribution of heavy metals in urban airborne particulate matter in Frankfurt, Germany. Environ Sci Technol 39:2983–2989
Li P, Qian H (2011) Human health risk assessment for chemical pollutants in drinking water source in Shizuishan City, Northwest China. J Environ Health Sci Eng 8:41–48
Xu P, Huang S, Wang ZA, Lagos G (2006) Daily intakes of copper, zinc and arsenic in drinking water by population of Shanghai, China. Sci Total Environ 362:50–55
Badr EAE, Agrama AAE, Badr SAE (2011) Heavy metals in drinking water and human health, Egypt. Nutr Food Sci 41:210–217
Demir V, Dere T, Ergin S, Cakr Y, Celik F (2015) Determination and health risk assessment of heavy metals in drinking water of Tunceli, Turkey. Water Resource 42:508–516
Bakis R, Tuncan A (2011) An investigation of heavy metal and migration through groundwater from the landfill area of Eskisehir in Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 176:87–98
El Khatib R, Lartiges BS, El Samrani A, Faure P, Houhou J, Ghanbaja J (2012) Speciation of organic matter and heavy metals in urban wastewaters from an emerging country. Water Air Soil Pollut 223:4695–4708
Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWAF) (2000) Strategic environmental assessment for water use Mhlathuze catchment—KZN. Report No. SEA-01/2000, DWAF: Pretoria, South Africa
Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWAF) (2002) Water quality issues in the Usutu-Mhlathuze: review of water quality status and issues in the WMA; DWAF: Pretoria, South Africa, p 27
Howd RA, Fan AM (2008) Risk assessment for chemicals in drinking water. Wiley, Hoboken
Rodriguez Proteau R, Grant RL (2005) Toxicity evaluation and human health risk assessment of surface and groundwater contaminated by recycled hazardous waste materials. In: Handbook of environmental chemistry, vol 2 (Part F), Springer, Berlin, pp. 133–189
USEPA (2000) Science policy council’s risk characterization handbook (Office of Science Policy, Washington, DC 20460, EPA 100-B-00-002)
Matzke A, Sturdevant D, Wigal J (2011) Human health criteria issue paper—toxics rulemaking. State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Portland
Nguyen VA, Bang S, Viet PH, Kim KW (2009) Contamination of groundwater and risk assessment for arsenic exposure in Ha Nam province. Vietnam Environ Intl 35(3):466–472
Balaram V (1993) Characterization of trace elements in environmental samples by ICP-MS. At Spectrosc 6:174–179
USEPA (1989) Risk assessment guidance for superfund, vol 1 (Human health manual-part A), EPA/540/1-89/002
USEPA (1992) Definitions and general principles for exposure assessment. Guidelines for exposure assessment, Washington, DC: Office of Pesticide Programs, USA
USEPA (1996) Quantitative uncertainty analysis of super fund residential risk path way models for soil and groundwater. White Paper. Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, Oak Ridge, TN, USA
USEPA, IRIS (2011) US Environmental Protection Agency’s Integrated Risk Information System. http://www.epa.gov/iris/
Oregon, Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) (2011) Risk based chemicals for individual chemicals, environmental cleanup and tanks program. Revision September 15
USEPA (2011) Regional screening levels (RSL) summary table. Washington, DC
WHO (2006) Drinking water guidelines. World Health Organization Standard, Geneva, p 6
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the University Grants Commission, New Delhi, India.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Parth, V., Mukherjee, S. (2019). Health Risk Assessment of Some Dominant Heavy Metal Species Detected in Subsurface Water Near Kolkata MSW Landfill Site. In: Kundu, R., Narula, R., Paul, R., Mukherjee, S. (eds) Environmental Biotechnology For Soil and Wastewater Implications on Ecosystems. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6846-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6846-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6845-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6846-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)