Abstract
Recent developments in the interdisciplinary field of research on human development , amounting to no less than a conceptual revolution, strongly suggest that the so-called interactionist consensus on nature–culture debates falls far short of accounting for the true complexity of developmental dynamics. There is a strong affinity on this point between the recently influential developmental systems perspective (DSP) and Vygotsky ’s works including in its activity theory lineage. In these frameworks, individual and environmental characteristics are understood to continuously emerge in the life course, while codefining and cogenerating each other in the very process of developmental transactions. Both frameworks shift beyond the concept of development as a mechanically additive, hybrid product in which external and internal (genetic and environmental) influences are mechanically summated and combined as extraneous and separate units to be added to each other. Furthermore, while sharing the emphasis on joint determination by multiple causes, contextual sensitivity and contingency, Vygotsky ’s framework expanded through Transformative Activist Stance is more radical and resolute in offering conceptual tools to understand development as an activity -dependent, emergent co-construction of developmental outcomes by human beings coacting with others in agentively coauthoring their communal world while relying on available cultural resources. This discussion creates a context in which the relevance of works by Mariane Hedegaard can be highlighted.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bakhtin, M. M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bidell, T. R., & Fischer, K. W. (1996). Between nature and nurture: The role of human agency in the epigenesis of intelligence. In R. Sternberg & E. Grigorenko (Eds.), Intelligence: Heredity and environment (pp. 193–242). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Charney, E. (2008). Genes and ideologies. Perspectives on Politics, 6, 299–319.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2007). The flat earth and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. Educational Researcher, 36, 318–334.
Dar-Nimrod, I., & Heine, S. J. (2011). Genetic essentialism: On the deceptive determinism of DNA. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 800–818.
Engels, F. (1939). Anti-Dühring. New York: International Publishers.
Fischer, K. A. (1980). Theory of cognitive development: The control and construction of hierarchies of skills. Psychological Review, 87, 477–531.
Gould, S. J. (1996). The mismeasure of man (2nd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton.
Gutiérrez, C. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits and repertoire of practice. Educational Researcher, 32, 19–25.
Haslam, N. (2011). Genetic essentialism, neuroessentialism, and stigma. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 819–824.
Hedegaard, M. (2009). Children’s development from a cultural-historical approach: Children’s activity in everyday local settings as foundation for their development. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 16(1), 64–81.
Hedegaard, M. (2012). Analyzing children’s learning and development in everyday settings from a cultural-historical wholeness approach. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(2), 127–138.
Hedegaard, M., & Fleer, M. (2008). Studying children. A cultural–historical approach. England: Open University Press.
Hedegaard, M., & Fleer, M. (2013). Play, learning, and children’s development: Everyday life in families and transition to school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hruby, G. G. (2012). Three requirements for justifying an educational neuroscience. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 1–23.
Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
Karimi-Aghdam, S. (2017). Rethinking Vygotskian cultural-historical theory in light of Pepperian root metaphor theory: Dynamic interplay of organicism and contextualism. Human Development, 59(5), 251–282.
Keller, F.E. (2010). Gilbert Gottlieb and the developmental point of view. In K.E. Hood, C. Tucker Halpern, G. Greenberg, & R.M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of developmental science, behavior, and genetics (pp. xi–xiv). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12.
Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Lerner, R. M. (2006). Developmental science, developmental systems, and contemporary theories of human development. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1–17)., Theoretical models of human development Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Lickliter, R., & Honeycutt, H. (2003a). Developmental dynamics: Towards a biologically plausible evolutionary psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 819–835.
Lickliter, R., & Honeycutt, H. (2003b). Evolutionary approaches to cognitive development: Status and strategy. Journal of Cognition and Development, 4, 459–473.
Lickliter, R., & Honeycutt, H. (2015). Biology, development, and human systems. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (pp. 162–207). New York, NY: Wiley.
Marx, K. (1844/1978). Economic and philosophical manuscripts. In R.C. Tucker (Ed.), Marx/Engels reader (2nd ed., pp. 66–125). New York: Norton.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1845-46/1978). The German ideology. In R.C. Tucker (Ed.), Marx/Engels reader (2nd ed., pp. 146–200). New York: Norton.
Ollman, B. (1979). Social and sexual revolution: Essays on Marx and Reich. Boston: South End.
Overton, W. F. (2006). Developmental psychology: Philosophy, concepts, methodology. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Theoretical models of human development: Vol. 1, Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., pp. 18–88). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Oyama, S. (2000). Evolution’s eye. Durham, NC: Duke University.
Robert, J. S. (2004). Embryology, epigenesis, and evolution: Taking development seriously. New York: Cambridge University.
Stetsenko, A. (2005). Activity as object- related: Resolving the dichotomy of individual and collective types of activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 70–88.
Stetsenko, A. (2007). Being- through- doing: Bakhtin and Vygotsky in dialogue. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 25–37.
Stetsenko, A. (2008). From relational ontology to transformative activist stance on development and learning: Expanding Vygotsky’s (CHAT) project. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 471–491.
Stetsenko, A. (2009). Vygotsky and the conceptual revolution in developmental sciences: Towards a unified (non-additive) account of human development. In M. Fleer, M. Hedegaard, J. Tudge, & A. Prout (Eds.), World yearbook of education. Constructing childhood: Global–local policies and practices (pp. 125–142). New York: Routledge.
Stetsenko, A. (2010). Teaching-learning and development as activist projects of historical Becoming: Expanding Vygotsky’s approach to pedagogy. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 5(1), 6–16.
Stetsenko, A. (2011). Darwin and Vygotsky on development: An exegesis on human nature. In M. Kontopodis, C. Wulf, & B. Fichtner (Eds.), Children, development and education (pp. 25–41). Dordrecht: Springer.
Stetsenko, A. (2014). Transformative activist stance for education: Inventing the future in moving beyond the status quo. In T. Corcoran (Ed.), Psychology in Education: Critical Theory~Practice (pp. 181–198). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Stetsenko, A. (2015). Theory for and as social practice of realizing the future: Implications from a transformative activist stance. In J. Martin, J. Sugarman, & K. Slaney (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of theoretical and philosophical psychology: Methods, approaches, and new directions for social sciences (pp. 102–116). New York: Wiley.
Stetsenko, A. (2016a). Moving beyond the relational worldview: Exploring the next steps premised on agency and a commitment to social change. Human Development, 59, 283–289.
Stetsenko, A. (2016b). The transformative mind: Expanding Vygotsky’s approach to human development and education. New York: Cambridge University.
Stetsenko, A. (2017). Putting the radical notion of equality in the service of disrupting inequality in education: Research findings and conceptual advances. Review of Research in Education, 41, 112–135.
Stetsenko, A., & Arievitch, I. M. (2010). Cultural-historical activity theory: Foundational worldview and major principles. In J. Martin & S. Kirschner (Eds.), The sociocultural turn in psychology: The contextual emergence of mind and self (pp. 231–253). New York: Columbia University.
Stetsenko, A., & Ho, P.-C. G. (2015). The serious joy and the joyful work of play: Children becoming agentive actors in co-authoring themselves and their world through play. International Journal of Early Childhood, 47(2), 221–234.
Thelen, E. (2005). Dynamic systems theory and the complexity of change. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 15, 255–283.
Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Varma, S., McCandliss, B., & Schwartz, D. (2008). Scientific and pragmatic challenges for bridging education and neuroscience. Educational Researcher, 37, 140–152.
Vianna, E., & Stetsenko, A. (2011). Connecting learning and identity development through a transformative activist stance: Application in adolescent development in a child welfare program. Human Development, 54, 313–338.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1993). The collected works. (Vol. 2). The fundamentals of defectology. In R. W. Rieber, & A. S. Carton (Eds.). New York: Plenum.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The collected works. (Vol. 4). The history of the development of higher mental functions. In R. W. Rieber, (Ed.). New York, NY: Plenum.
Wahlsten, D. (2003). Airbrushing heritability. Genes, Brain, & Behavior, 2, 327–329.
Witherington, D. C. (2007). The dynamic systems approach as metatheory for developmental psychology. Human Development, 50, 127–153.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stetsenko, A. (2019). Cultural-Historical Activity Theory Meets Developmental Systems Perspective: Transformative Activist Stance and Natureculture. In: Edwards, A., Fleer, M., Bøttcher, L. (eds) Cultural-Historical Approaches to Studying Learning and Development. Perspectives in Cultural-Historical Research, vol 6. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6826-4_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6826-4_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6825-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6826-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)