Trade Facilitation in South Asia: Landlocked Countries’ Perspective
- 151 Downloads
This study has made a thorough analysis of export performance of South Asian landlocked countries—Afghanistan, Bhutan and Nepal. An estimation based on the gravity modelling technique shows that transport costs dominantly increase costs and lower trade. Also, the results suggest that landlocked countries in the region have about a 2.5 per cent trade disadvantage. The results show that the landlocked countries in the region can trade about 10 per cent more than other countries if they have better interaction with the trade facilitation index. We also document that a breakthrough for reducing trade costs is to improve the trade facilitation measure—the quality of governance, transparency, documentation processing time, infrastructure, transit facilities, and information and communication technology.
KeywordsTrade facilitation Landlocked countries South Asia
- Ahmed, M. 2006. Trade Facilitation Needs Assessment-Private Sector’s Perspective of Bangladesh. Regional Consultation on Trade Facilitation Needs Assessment in South Asia. CUTS International and UNDP Regional Centre, Colombo.Google Scholar
- Arvis, J.-F., Saslavsky, D., Ojala, L., Shepherd, B., Busch, C., Raj, A. & Naula, T. 2016. Connecting to compete 2016: Trade logistics in the global economy. The World Bank.Google Scholar
- Baldwin, R. & Taglioni, D. 2006. Gravity for Dummies and Dummies for Gravity equations Working Paper 12516.Google Scholar
- Banik, N. & Gilbert, J. 2008. Regional integration and trade costs in South Asia. ADB Institute Working Paper No. 127, 123.Google Scholar
- Baysan, T., Panagariya, A. & Pitigala, N. 2006. Preferential trading in South Asia. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper.Google Scholar
- CEPII 2016. The CEPII Gravity Dataset http://www.cepii.fr/anglaisgraph/bdd/gravity.asp (accessed on 16/04/2016).
- Engman, M. 2005. The Economic impact of trade facilitation. OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
- George, J. 2011. Doha Round Negotiations on Trade Facilitation: The Gradient of Trade Policy Reforms. In: Chatterjee, B. & George, J. (eds.) The Doha Round and South Asia: Need for Better Coordination. CUTS International, Jaipur.Google Scholar
- Grainger, A. 2008. Customs and trade facilitation: from concepts to implementation. World Customs Journal, 2, 17–30.Google Scholar
- Grainger, A. 2011. Trade facilitation: a conceptual review. Journal of World Trade, 45, 39–62.Google Scholar
- International Trade Center 2013. WTO trade facilitation agreement: a business guide for developing countries. http://www.intracen.org/wto-trade-facilitation-agreement-business-guide-for-developing-countries/
- Panagariya, A. 2007. Trading Choices of South Asia. In: Ahmed, S. & Ghani, E. (eds.) South Asia: Growth and Regional Integration. World Bank, Washington DC.Google Scholar
- Paudel, R. 2014. Trade liberalisation and economic growth in developing countries: does stage of development matter? Crawford School Research Paper No. 14–13: The Australian National University, Canberra, 1–28.Google Scholar
- SAWTEE 2018. Trade Facilitation in South Asia: A Regional Perspective, in press.Google Scholar
- Tinbergen, J. 1962. Shaping The World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy, The Twentieth Century Fund, New York, USA.Google Scholar
- Weerahewa, J. 2009. Impact of trade facilitation measures and regional trade agreements on food and agricultural trade in South Asia. Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade Working Paper Series, 4.Google Scholar
- Wilson, J. S. & Otsuki, T. 2007. Regional integration in South Asia: What role for trade facilitation? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper.Google Scholar
- World Bank 2016a. International Trade Costs. ESCAP World Bank: ESCAP World Bank.Google Scholar
- World Bank 2016b. World Development Indicators. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, http://data.worldbank.org (accessed on 16/12/2016).
- World Bank 2016c. World Integrated Trade Solution, WITS database. World Bank, http://wits.worldbank.org/WITS/WITS/Default-A.aspx?Page=Default (accessed on 16/04/2016).
- World Bank 2017. Equal opportunity for all. New York: A world bank group flagship report: The World Bank Publication.Google Scholar
- World Bank Group 2010. Investing across borders. Database updated in 2012: World Bank.Google Scholar
- World Economic Forum 2016. Global Competitiveness Report, 2016–2017. World Economic Forum, Geneva: World Economic Forum, Geneva.Google Scholar