Abstract
This study has made a thorough analysis of export performance of South Asian landlocked countries—Afghanistan, Bhutan and Nepal. An estimation based on the gravity modelling technique shows that transport costs dominantly increase costs and lower trade. Also, the results suggest that landlocked countries in the region have about a 2.5 per cent trade disadvantage. The results show that the landlocked countries in the region can trade about 10 per cent more than other countries if they have better interaction with the trade facilitation index. We also document that a breakthrough for reducing trade costs is to improve the trade facilitation measure—the quality of governance, transparency, documentation processing time, infrastructure, transit facilities, and information and communication technology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ahmed, M. 2006. Trade Facilitation Needs Assessment-Private Sector’s Perspective of Bangladesh. Regional Consultation on Trade Facilitation Needs Assessment in South Asia. CUTS International and UNDP Regional Centre, Colombo.
Anderson, J. E. & Van Wincoop, E. 2003. Gravity with Gravitas: a Solution to the Border Puzzle. The American Economic Review, 93, 170–192.
Arvis, J.-F., Saslavsky, D., Ojala, L., Shepherd, B., Busch, C., Raj, A. & Naula, T. 2016. Connecting to compete 2016: Trade logistics in the global economy. The World Bank.
Baldwin, R. & Taglioni, D. 2006. Gravity for Dummies and Dummies for Gravity equations Working Paper 12516.
Banik, N. & Gilbert, J. 2008. Regional integration and trade costs in South Asia. ADB Institute Working Paper No. 127, 123.
Baysan, T., Panagariya, A. & Pitigala, N. 2006. Preferential trading in South Asia. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper.
CEPII 2016. The CEPII Gravity Dataset http://www.cepii.fr/anglaisgraph/bdd/gravity.asp (accessed on 16/04/2016).
De, P. 2011. Why is trade at borders a costly affair in South Asia? An empirical investigation. Contemporary South Asia, 19, 441–464.
Duval, Y. & Utoktham, C. 2011. Intraregional trade costs in Asia: A primer. Asia Pacific Development Journal, 18, 1.
Engman, M. 2005. The Economic impact of trade facilitation. OECD Publishing.
George, J. 2011. Doha Round Negotiations on Trade Facilitation: The Gradient of Trade Policy Reforms. In: Chatterjee, B. & George, J. (eds.) The Doha Round and South Asia: Need for Better Coordination. CUTS International, Jaipur.
Grainger, A. 2008. Customs and trade facilitation: from concepts to implementation. World Customs Journal, 2, 17–30.
Grainger, A. 2011. Trade facilitation: a conceptual review. Journal of World Trade, 45, 39–62.
International Trade Center 2013. WTO trade facilitation agreement: a business guide for developing countries. http://www.intracen.org/wto-trade-facilitation-agreement-business-guide-for-developing-countries/
Iwanow, T. & Kirkpatrick, C. 2007. Trade facilitation, regulatory quality and export performance. Journal of International Development, 19, 735–753.
Panagariya, A. 2007. Trading Choices of South Asia. In: Ahmed, S. & Ghani, E. (eds.) South Asia: Growth and Regional Integration. World Bank, Washington DC.
Paudel, R. 2014. Trade liberalisation and economic growth in developing countries: does stage of development matter? Crawford School Research Paper No. 14–13: The Australian National University, Canberra, 1–28.
Portugal-Perez, A. & Wilson, J. S. 2012. Export performance and trade facilitation reform: Hard and soft infrastructure. World Development, 40, 1295–1307.
SAWTEE 2018. Trade Facilitation in South Asia: A Regional Perspective, in press.
Silva, J. S. & Tenreyro, S. 2006. The Log of Gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88, 641–658.
Tinbergen, J. 1962. Shaping The World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy, The Twentieth Century Fund, New York, USA.
Weerahewa, J. 2009. Impact of trade facilitation measures and regional trade agreements on food and agricultural trade in South Asia. Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade Working Paper Series, 4.
Wilson, J. S., Mann, C. L. & Otsuki, T. 2005. Assessing the benefits of trade facilitation: A global perspective. The World Economy, 28, 841–871.
Wilson, J. S. & Otsuki, T. 2007. Regional integration in South Asia: What role for trade facilitation? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper.
World Bank 2016a. International Trade Costs. ESCAP World Bank: ESCAP World Bank.
World Bank 2016b. World Development Indicators. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, http://data.worldbank.org (accessed on 16/12/2016).
World Bank 2016c. World Integrated Trade Solution, WITS database. World Bank, http://wits.worldbank.org/WITS/WITS/Default-A.aspx?Page=Default (accessed on 16/04/2016).
World Bank 2017. Equal opportunity for all. New York: A world bank group flagship report: The World Bank Publication.
World Bank Group 2010. Investing across borders. Database updated in 2012: World Bank.
World Economic Forum 2016. Global Competitiveness Report, 2016–2017. World Economic Forum, Geneva: World Economic Forum, Geneva.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Paudel, R.C. (2019). Trade Facilitation in South Asia: Landlocked Countries’ Perspective. In: Jayanthakumaran, K., Shukla, N., Harvie, C., Erdenetsogt, O. (eds) Trade Logistics in Landlocked and Resource Cursed Asian Countries . Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6814-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6814-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6813-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6814-1
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)