Advertisement

Inclusion of Firm Heterogeneity in Resource Boom-Bust Cycle Literature

Chapter
  • 131 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter combines the resource curse and firm heterogeneity to estimate how a resource boom will affect non-resource-intensive productivity. The cost of production for the non-resource sector is high due to expensive domestic currency, volatile commodity prices, and rent-seeking activities. The economic diversification leads to long-term growth by generating spill-over effects and increasing returns of scale, but effective economic diversification demands a greater understanding of how a group of firms behave during a resource boom. While low-productivity firms can improve their productivity with low-cost options, highly productive firms actually experience a decline in productivity due to the high cost of shifting to other opportunities, so the net effect is a stagnation of aggregate productivity that is consistent with the resource curse hypothesis.

Keywords

Resource curse Firm heterogeneity Economic diversification 

References

  1. Alemu, A. M. (2016), The Impacts of Natural Resource Abundance on Export Diversification and Structural change in African Economies, Journal of Economic Development, Management, IT, Finance and Marketing, 8 (2), 1–15.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, J. J. and Ross, M. L. (2014), The Big Oil Change: A Closer Look at the Haber–Menaldo Analysis, Comparative Political Studies, 47 (7), 993–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Auty, R. M. (1993), Sustaining Development in Mineral Economies: The Resource Curse Thesis, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  4. Arezki, R. and Bruckner, M. (2011), Oil Rents, Corruption, and State Stability: Evidence from Panel Data Regressions, European Economic Review, 55 (7), 955–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Badeeb, R. A., Leana, H. H., and Clarkb, J. (2017), The evolution of the natural resource curse thesis: A critical literature survey, Resources Policy 51, 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barro, R. J. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (2004), Economic growth, 2nd ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  7. Berman, N., Martin, P. and Mayer, T. (2012), How do different exporters react to exchange rate changes? Theory, empirics and aggregate implications, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127 (1), 437–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhattacharyya, S. and Hodler, R. (2010), Natural resources, democracy and corruption, European Economic Review, 54 (4), 608–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brunnschweiler, C. N. and Bulte, E. H. (2008), The resource curse revisited and revised; a tale of paradoxes and red herrings, Journal of Environment Economic Management, 55 (3), 248–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cadot, O., Carrere, C. and Strauss-Kahn, V. (2007), Export diversification: what’s behind the hump? CEPR Discussion paper No. 6590, London.Google Scholar
  11. Cook, J. A. (2014), The effect of firm-level productivity on exchange rate pass-through, Economic Letters, 122 (1), 27–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corden, W. M. and Neary, J. P. (1982), Booming sector and de-industrialisation in a small open economy, The Economic Journal, 825–848.Google Scholar
  13. Davis, G. A. and Tilton, J. E. (2005), The resource curse, Natural Resources Forum, 29 (3), 233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dennis, A. and Shepherd, B. (2011), Trade facilitation and export diversification, The World Economy, 34 (1), 101–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fung, L. (2008) Large real exchange rate movements, firm dynamics, and productivity growth, The Canadian Journal of Economics, 41 (2), 391–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gelb, A. ed. (1988), Oil Windfalls: Blessing or Curse? Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  17. Gylfason, T. (2001), Natural resources, education, and economic development, European Economic Review, 45 (4), 847–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Helpman, E. Melitz, M. and Rubinstein, Y. (2008), Estimating trade flows: trading partners and trading volumes, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123 (2), 441–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hirshman, A. O. (1958), The Strategy of Economic Development, Haven CT, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Imbs, J. and Wacziarg, R. (2003), Stages of diversification, The American Economic Review, 93 (1), 63–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Iscan, T. B. (2015), Windfall Resource Income, Productivity Growth, and Manufacturing Employment, Open Economic Review, 26, 279–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ismail, K. (2010), The Structural Manifestation of the Dutch Disease: The Case of Oil Exporting Countries, International Monetary Fund Working Paper 10/103.Google Scholar
  23. James, A. (2015), The resource curse, a statistical mirage?, Journal of Development Economics, 114, 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kim, D. H. and Lin, S. C. (2015), Natural resources and economic development: a new panel evidence, Environ. Resource. Econ., 1–29.Google Scholar
  25. König, M. D., Lorenz, J. and Zilibotti, F. 2016, Innovation vs. imitation and the evolution of productivity distributions, Theoretical Economics, 11 (3), 1053–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuralbayeva, K. and Stefanski, R. 2013, Windfalls, structural transformation and specialization, Journal of International Economics, 90 (2), 273–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Love, J. (1979), Trade concentration and export instability, Journal of Development Studies, 15, 60–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li, B. G., Gupta, P. and Yu, J. (2017) From natural resource boom to sustainable economic growth: lessons from Mongolia, International Economics, 151, 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. MacBean, A. I. (1966), Export Instability and Economic Development, Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  30. Mayer, T., Melitz, M. J., and Ottaviano, G. I. P. (2014), Market Size, Competition, and the Product Mix of Exporters, American Economic Review, 104(2): 495–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Melitz, M. J. and Trefler, D. (2012), Gains from trade when firms matter, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26 (2), 91–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Melitz, M. J. (2003), ‘The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity’, Econometrica, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 1695–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Papyrakis, E. and Gerlagh, R. (2004), The resource curse hypothesis and its transmission channels, Journal of Comparative Economics, 32, 181–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Parlee, B. L. (2015), Avoiding the resource curse: indigenous communities and Canada’s oil sands, World Development, 74, 425–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Prebisch, R. (1964), Commercial policy in the underdeveloped countries, reprinted in Gerald M. Meier (ed.) Leading Issues in Development Economics, Oxford University Press, New York, 286–289.Google Scholar
  36. Rostow, W. W. (1960), The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifasto, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  37. Ross, M. L. (2001), Does oil hinder democracy?, World Politics: Cambridge core, 53 (3), 325–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sachs, J. D., Warner, A. M. (1999), The big Push, natural resource booms and growth, Journal of Development Economics, 59 (1), 43–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Van der Ploeg, F. (2011), Natural Resources: Curse or Blessing, Journal of Economic Literature, 49 (2), 366–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Warner, A. (2015) Natural Resource Booms in the Modern Era: Is the curse still alive?, IMF Working Paper WP/15/237, IMF.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Accounting, Economics & FinanceUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia

Personalised recommendations