Skip to main content

Evaluation of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Tracks on Clayey Subgrade

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 887 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 28))

Abstract

In railroad track, geosynthetic is used for multiple functions, namely, reinforcement, separation, filtration, and drainage. In the present study, static and cyclic tests are performed on full-panel railway track models laid on compacted soil subgrades. Tests are performed on model tracks with two different thicknesses of subballast layer and laid on subgrade soil, namely, Dhanaury clay. Model tracks are reinforced with geogrid or geotextile or both at suitable interfaces. Track condition after a heavy rainfall was simulated. The models reinforced with geogrid at ballast–subballast interface were found to be more effective in reducing the tie displacements, ballast and subballast strains, and subgrade displacements as compared to the models reinforced with geotextile at subballast subgrade interface for tracks with Dhanaury clay as subgrade. The present study is also carried out by using a commercially available finite element software code, MIDAS/GTS (Midas manual 2013). Laboratory tests (triaxial tests and interface tests) are being conducted to calculate the constitutive parameters of the different track materials and interfaces which are used in the analyses. Model test results were extended to the field and subgrade modulus (Esg) and subballast thickness (dsb) as well as shear strength parameters (c’sg and ϕ’sg) of the subgrade soil, stiffness of geogrid, and coefficient of permeability of the subgrade soil were track parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brown SF, Kwan J, Thom NH (2007) Identifying the key parameters that influence geogrid reinforcement of railway ballast. Geotext Geomembr 25:326–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chawla S, Shahu JT (2016) Reinforcement and mud-pumping benefits of geosynthetics in railway tracks: model tests. Geotext Geomembr, Elsevier, 44, pp 366–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, T-C, Chen R-H, Chen S-S. (2000) A nonlinear homogenized model applicable to reinforced soil analysis, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 18, pp. 349–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan JM, Chang YC (1970) Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soils. Journal Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Division, ASCE 96(5):1629–1653

    Google Scholar 

  • Koerner RM (2005) Designing with geosynthetic, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinek K (1986) Geotextiles used by the German Federal Railway—experiences and specifications. Geotext Geomembr 3:175–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midas (2013) Midas/GTS (geotechnical and tunnel analysis system) reference manual for modelling. Integrated design and analysis. Midas Corporation

    Google Scholar 

  • Selig ET, Waters JM (1994) Track geotechnology and substructure management. Thomas Telford, London, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shahu JT (1993) Some analytical and experimental investigations to study the behavior of soils under the railway track, Ph. D. Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahu JT, Yudhbir, Kameswara Rao NSV (2000) A rational method for design of railroad track foundation, Soils Found 40(6): 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sowmiya LS, Shahu JT, Gupta KK (2013) Stresses and displacements in reinforced tracks. Institution of Civil Engineers, Ground Improvement

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowmiya LS (2013) Analyses and experimental investigations of railway tracks on clayey subgrades with and without geosynthetic reinforcement, Thesis, Ph. D. Indian Institute of Technology Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesic AS (1963) Bearing capacity of deep foundations in sands, National Academy of Science, National Research Council. Highway Res Rec 39:112–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterkorn HF, Fang HY (1986) Foundation engineering handbook. VanNostrand Reinhold Company Inc., New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sowmiya Chawla .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shahu, J.T., Chawla, S. (2019). Evaluation of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Tracks on Clayey Subgrade. In: Sundaram, R., Shahu, J., Havanagi, V. (eds) Geotechnics for Transportation Infrastructure. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering , vol 28. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6701-4_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6701-4_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6700-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6701-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics