Financial Performance Evaluation Using MADM Approaches in Indian Banks

  • Neeraj SainiEmail author
  • Dinesh Khanduja
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


Performance evaluation is critically important as it helps in the identification of weak areas and to plan or replan more effective actions for a better performance. Banking sector plays a pivotal role in economic development of any country and in a fast-developing economy like India, this sector has a major role to play. Performance appraisal of banks is very significant to boost economic planning. This study aims to utilize the multi-criteria decision model to evaluate the performance of banks during the financial year 2017–18. Total 14 banks were selected for the evaluation process in terms of financial parameters defined by Reserve Bank of India. AHP and TOPSIS methodologies of Multi-Attribute Decision Making have been utilized for the evaluation. In AHP, priority weights of three parameters were determined. These weights act as input for the TOPSIS method and final rank of various banks are obtained.


MADM AHP TOPSIS Performance evaluation Bank 


  1. 1.
    Deng HYC, Willis RJ (2000) Inter-company comparison using TOPSIS with objective weights. Comput Oper Res 27:963–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Azimi M, Taghizadeh H, Farahmand N, Pourmahmoud J (2014) Selection of industrial robots using the Polygons area method. Int J Ind Eng Comput 5(4):631–646Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rao RV (2006) A material selection model using graph theory and matrix approach. Mater Sci Eng A 431(1):248–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48(1):9–26MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Besbes M, Affonso RC, Zolghadri M, Masmoudi F, Haddar M (2017) Multi-criteria decision making for the selection of a performant manual workshop layout: a case study. Int Fed Autom Control 50(1):12404–12409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kumar R, Singal SK (2015) Penstock material selection in small hydropower plants using MADM methods. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52:240–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Seyed Hadi Mousavi-Nasab, Alireza Sotoudeh-Anvari (2017) A comprehensive MCDM-based approach using TOPSIS, COPRAS and DEA as an auxiliary tool for material selection problems. Mater Des 121:237–253Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sabaghi M, Mascle C, Baptiste P (2015) Application of DOE-TOPSIS technique in decision-making problems. IFAC Papers 48(3):773–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boran FE, Genç S, Kurt M, Akay D (2009) A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method. Expert Syst with Appl 36:11363–11368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gurung S, Phipon R (2016) Multi-criteria decision making for supplier selection using AHP and TOPSIS method. Int J Eng Inventions 6(2):13–17Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jain V, Kumar A, Sakhuja S, Thoduka N, Aggarwal R (2016) Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS: a case study in the Indian automotive industry. Neural Comput ApplGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Önder E, Taş N, Hepşen A (2013) Performance evaluation of Turkish banks using analytical hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods. J Int Sci Publ: Econ Bus 7(1):470–503Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mandic K, Delibasic B, Knezevic S, Benkovic S (2014) Analysis of the financial parameters of Serbian banks through the application of the fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods. Econ Model 43:30–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dehghan-Manshadi B, Mahmudi H, Abedian A, Mahmudi R (2007) A novel method for materials selection in mechanical design: Combination of non-linear normalization and a modified digital logic method. Mater Des 28(1):8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Saket S, Singh A, Khanduja D (2015) Fuzzy-VIKOR analysis for customer performance index of civil domestic airline industry in India. Manage Sci Lett 5:301–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.M. TechNational Institute of TechnologyKurukshetraIndia
  2. 2.MEDNational Institute of Technology KurukshetraKurukshetraIndia

Personalised recommendations