Skip to main content

A Critical Assessment of J-Integral and CTOD as Fracture Parameters

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Interdisciplinary Engineering

Abstract

Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics (EPFM) is often used for the integrity assessment of components made from ductile materials. It offers two fracture criterions viz., the J-integral and Crack Tip Opening Displacement (CTOD) which predicts the onset of unstable crack growth in ductile materials or materials undergoing significant plastic deformation. Hence the measurement of these parameters is vital. After presenting a brief introduction to the J-integral, CTOD and the relationship between these two parameters, the basic technique for measuring the J-integral for mode I problem through numerical simulation for is illustrated. The objective of this work is to critically assess the viability of the aforementioned fracture parameters in the integrity assessment of structures. A number of differences and similarities that exists between these two parameters in terms of quality and measurement methods as given in the standards (such as American Society for Testing and Materials and British Standards Institution) is brought out in this work. In addition, the misconceptions detained about the elastic-plastic fracture parameters is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anderson TL (2005) Fracture mechanics—fundamentals and applications, 3rd edn. Taylor and Francis Group, Florida

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Gdoutos EE (2003) Crack tip plastic zone according to Irwin’s model. In: Gdoutos EE, Rodopoulos CA, Yates JR (eds) Problems of fracture mechanics and fatigue. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 95–97

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Dugdale S (1960) Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J Mech Phys Solids 8:100–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Broek D (1982) Elementary engineering fracture mechanics, 3rd edn. Kluwer Academic Publisher, The Netherlands

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Barenblatt GJ (1962) The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture. Adv Appl Mech 7:55–129

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Sarsoza DFB, Ruggieri C (2015) Experimental validation of relationship between fracture parameters J and CTOD for SE(B) and SE(T) specimens during ductile crack growth. Mar Syst Ocean Technol 10:60–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lu ML, Chiou KC, Chang FC (1996) Elastic-plastic fracture toughness of PC/ABS blend based on CTOD and J-Integral methods. Polymer 7(19):4289–4297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shih CF, deLorenzi HG, Andrews WR (1979) Studies on crack initiation and stable crack growth. In: Landes JD, Begley JA, Clarke GA (eds) Elastic-plastic fracture, ASTM STP 668, American Society for Testing and Materials, pp 65–120

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dawes MG (1979) Elastic-plastic fracture toughness based on the COD and J-contour integral concepts. In: Landes JD, Begley JA, Clarke GA (eds), Elastic-plastic fracture, ASTM STP 668, American Society for Testing and Materials, pp 307–333

    Google Scholar 

  10. ASTM E1820-01 Standard test method for measurement of fracture toughness, ASTM International

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shih CH (1981) Relationships between the J-Integral and the Crack opening displacement for stationary and extending cracks. J Mech Phys Solids 29(4):305–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tagawa T, Kayamori Y, Ohata M, Handa T, Kawabata T, Yamashita Y, Tsutsumi K, Yoshinari H, Aihara S, Hagihara Y (2010) Comparison of CTOD standards: BS7448-Part I and revised ASTM E1290. Eng Fract Mech 77:327–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bathe KJ (2014) Finite element procedures, 2nd edn. Prentice Hell, Pearson Education, New Jersey

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Mohammadi S (2008) Extended finite element method for fracture analysis of structures. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Rao SS (2004) The Finite element method in engineering 4th Edn. Elsevier Sci Technol Books

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hrnjica B, Islamović F, Gačo D, Bajramović E (2016) Numerical calculation of J-integral using finite elements method. In: 7th international scientific conference on defensive technologies, 6–7 Oct. 2016, Belgrade, Serbia

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moon DH, Lee JS, Lee JM, Kim MH (2014) Validation on the relationship between J integral and CTOD for offshore structural steel weldments by experimental and numerical analyses. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2014 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition IMECE2014, November 14–20, 2014, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shi Y, Sun S, Murakawa H, Ueda Y (1998) Finite element analysis on relationships between the J-integral and CTOD for stationary cracks in welded tensile specimens. Int J Press Vessels Pip 75:197–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bomidi JAR, Sadeghi F (2014) Three-dimensional finite element elastic-plastic model for subsurface initiated spalling in rolling contacts. J Tribol 136:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  20. Validation of contour integral functions (J and C(t)) in ABAQUS v6.11-v6.14 for combined mechanical and residual

    Google Scholar 

  21. ABAQUS (2014) Version 6.14 User’s Manual, DassaultSystèmesSimulia Corp.; Providence, RI, USA

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dodds RH Jr, Carpenter WC, Sorem WA (1988) Numerical evaluation of A 3-D J-integral and comparison with experimental results for a 3-point bend specimen. Eng Fract Mech 29(3):275–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Graba M (2017) Proposal of the hybrid solution to determining the selected fracture parameters for SEN(B) specimens dominated by plane strain. Bull Pol Acad Sci Tech Sci 65(4):523–532

    Google Scholar 

  24. Begley JA, Landes JD (1972) The J integral as a fracture criterion fracture toughness. In: Proceedings of the 1971 national symposium on fracture mechanics, Part 11, ASTM STP 514, American Society for Testing and Materials, pp 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rice JR (1968) A path independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain concentration by notches and cracks. J Appl Mech 35:379–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sorem WA, Dodds RH, Jr, Rolfe ST (1991) A comparison of the J-integral and CTOD parameters for short crack specimen testing. In: Joyce JA (ed), Elastic-plastic fracture test methods: the user’s experience (Second Volume), ASTM STP 1114, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, pp 19–41

    Google Scholar 

  27. DRAFT NOTE—J.T. MartinOGBM/3, R.W.J. KoersOGBM/3, CTOD versus J-Integral as a fracture parameter, 25042001—SINTAP, April 8 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subbaiah Arunkumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Subramanian, R.H., Arunkumar, S., Jithin, S., Bollineni, R.K. (2019). A Critical Assessment of J-Integral and CTOD as Fracture Parameters. In: Kumar, M., Pandey, R., Kumar, V. (eds) Advances in Interdisciplinary Engineering . Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6577-5_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6577-5_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6576-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6577-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics