CFD Modeling of Commercial Slurry Flow Through Horizontal Pipeline

  • Om ParkashEmail author
  • Arvind Kumar
  • Basant Singh Sikarwar
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


In this paper, slurry flow characteristics of glass beads–water slurry has been studied in a pipe of 0.0549 m diameter using commercial software FLUENT. The study was carried out using Eulerian–Eulerian two-phase model with RNG K-epsilon model turbulence closure. The simulation was carried out for a glass bead particle of size 440 µm having efflux concentration ranging from 10 to 30% by volume with Prandtl fluid (Pr = 5.83) at different Reynolds number. The results of solid concentration contour, velocity contour, and pressure drop were predicted at different Reynolds numbers to analyze the slurry flow characteristics. The plot between pressure drop versus Reynolds number was plotted at different solid concentrations. The simulation results of the present study show good results with the experimental results of the literature. The present model shows the enhancement of suspension suitability of glass bead particles at a larger distance. Post-validation, parametric studies are carried out to study the effect of parameters.


Slurry flow Horizontal pipeline Eulerian two-phase model Pressure drop 


  1. 1.
    Toda M, Komori N, Saito S, Maeda S (1972) Hydraulic conveying of solids through pipe bends. J Chem Eng Jpn 5(1):4–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Turian RM, Yuan TF (1977) Flow of slurries in pipelines. AIChE J 23(3):232–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gillies RG, Shook CA, Wilson KC (1991) An improved two-layer model for horizontal slurry pipeline flow. Can J Chem Eng 69(1):173–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gillies RG, Hill KB, Mckibben MJ, Shook CA (1999) Solids transport by laminar Newtonian flows. Powder Technol 104:269–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gillies RG, Shook CA (2000) Modelling high concentration settling slurry flows. Can J Chem Eng 78:709–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Matousek V (2002) Pressure drops and flow patterns in sand-mixture pipes. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 26(6–7):693–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaushal DR, Tomita Y (2007) Experimental investigation for near-wall lift of coarser particles in slurry pipeline using γ-ray densitometer. Powder Technol 172(3):177–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chandel S, Singh SN, Seshadri V (2010) Transportation of high concentration coal ash slurries through pipelines. Int Arch Appl Sci Technol 1:1–9Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Melorie AK, Kaushal DR (2017) Experimental investigations of the effect of chemical additives on the rheological properties of highly concentrated iron ore slurries. KONA Powder Part J 2018001Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Singh JP, Kumar S, Mohapatra SK (2017) Modelling of two-phase solid-liquid flow in horizontal pipe using computational fluid dynamics technique. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42(31):20133–20137CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Om Parkash
    • 1
    Email author
  • Arvind Kumar
    • 2
  • Basant Singh Sikarwar
    • 3
  1. 1.Amity University GurgaonGurgaonIndia
  2. 2.YMCA University of Science and TechnologyFaridabadIndia
  3. 3.Amity University Uttar PradeshNoidaIndia

Personalised recommendations