Skip to main content

Steady-State Neutron Transport Theory and Simulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neutronics of Advanced Nuclear Systems
  • 749 Accesses

Abstract

Neutron transport theory is the research basis for neutronics and focuses on the description of neutron motion in media and the corresponding laws. There are two types of methods for neutron transport calculation: the Monte Carlo method (also called the probabilistic method or the stochastic method) and the deterministic method. The Monte Carlo method is a numerical method based on probability and statistical theories, and can explicitly describe the characteristics of randomly moving particles and the process of physical experiments. In contrast, in the deterministic method, a group of mathematical–physical equations are first built up to explain the physical characteristics of the target system. Then, by discretizing the variables in these equations, including direction, energy, space, and time, an approximate solution can be obtained with numerical calculation. There are complicated features for advanced nuclear systems, such as the complex neutron spectrum and angular distribution, complicated material composition, large spatial span, complex geometry, etc. The Monte Carlo method uses the continuous-energy cross section, and can be used to address any complex geometry, with prominent advantages for neutron transport simulations for advanced nuclear systems. However, some challenges, such as the slow convergence rate and difficulty in addressing problems of deep penetration, still exist. The deterministic method is faster, but falls short in addressing advanced nuclear systems with complex geometries, strong anisotropy of neutron scattering, and complicated energy spectrums. In recent years, the method of characteristics (MOC) and the discrete ordinates method with unstructured meshes have been developed with improved geometry processing abilities. However, problems, such as the ray effects and the high cost of large-scale systems, still need to be solved. The Monte Carlo–deterministic coupling method, which combines the advantages of both the Monte Carlo and deterministic methods, is one of the most efficient and accurate methods for solving transport problems in advanced nuclear systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lamarsh JR (1966) Introduction to nuclear reactor theory. Addison-Wesley Publication Company, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wu YC (2017) Fusion neutronics. Springer Nature Singapore Pte, Ltd

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Lewis EE, Miller WF Jr (1993) Computational methods of neutron transport. American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, Illinois

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu YC, Song J, Zheng HQ et al (2015) CAD-based Monte Carlo Program for integrated simulation of nuclear system SuperMC. Ann Nucl Energy 82:161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Song J, Sun GY, Chen ZP et al (2015) Study on Monte Carlo K-effective calculation method. Nucl Sci Eng 35(2):241–245 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ott K, Neuhold R (1985) Introductory nuclear reactor dynamics. American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park III, USA

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haghighat A, Wagner JC (2003) Monte Carlo variance reduction with deterministic importance functions. Prog Nucl Energy 42(1):25–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhao JB, Li XM, Wu B et al (2016) An automatic adaptive mesh generation method for weight window in Monte Carlo particle transport. Ann Nucl Energy 91:105–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wagner JC, Blakeman ED, Peplow DE (2007) Forward-weighted CADIS method for global variance reduction. Trans Am Nucl Soc 97:630–633

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davis A, Turner A (2011) Comparison of global variance reduction techniques for Monte Carlo radiation transport simulations of ITER. Fusion Eng Des 86(9–11):2698–2700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang S, Yu SP, He P (2016) Verification of SuperMC with ITER C-Lite neutronic model. Fusion Eng Des 113:126–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu YC (2018) Multi-functional Neutronics calculation methodology and program for nuclear design and radiation safety evaluation. Fusion Sci Technol 74(4):321–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen ZP, Song J, Wu B et al (2015) Optimal spatial subdivision method for improving geometry navigation performance in Monte Carlo particle transport simulation. Ann Nucl Energy 76:479–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Askew JR (1972) A characteristics formulation of the neutron transport equation in complicated geometries. Report AEEW-M 1108. United Kingdom Atomic Energy Establishment, Winfrith, England

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bell GI, Glasstone S (1970) Nuclear reactor theory. Van Nostrand Reihold Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wu YC, Xie ZS, Fischer U (1999) A discrete ordinates nodal method for one-dimensional neutron transport calculation in curvilinear geometries. Nucl Sci Eng 133:350–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Azmy Y, Sartori E (2010) Nuclear computational science: a century in review. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee H, Choi S, Lee D (2015) A hybrid Monte Carlo/method-of-characteristics method for efficient neutron transport analysis. Nucl Sci Eng 180:69–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu YC, Team FDS (2009) CAD-based interface programs for fusion neutron transport simulation. Fusion Eng Des 84(7–11):1987–1992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. X-5 Monte Carlo Team (2003) MCNP-A general Monte Carlo N-particle transport code, Version 5. LA-UR-03-1987, Los Alamos National Library

    Google Scholar 

  21. Leppanen J, Pusa M, Vitanen T (2015) The serpent Monte Carlo code: status, development and applications in 2013. Ann Nucl Energy 82:142–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lindley BA, Hosking JG, Smith PJ et al (2017) Current status of the reactor physics code WIMS and recent developments. Ann Nucl Energy 102:148–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1998) DOORS3.2 one, two- and three dimensional discrete ordinates neutron/photon transport code system. CCC-650, Oak Ridge, Tennessee

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chen J, Liu ZY, Zhao C et al (2018) A new high-fidelity neutronics code NECP-X. Ann Nucl Energy 116:417–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wu, Y. (2019). Steady-State Neutron Transport Theory and Simulation. In: Neutronics of Advanced Nuclear Systems. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6520-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6520-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6519-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6520-1

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics