Skip to main content

Access to Credit and Indebtedness Among Rural Households in Uttar Pradesh: Implications for Farm Income and Poverty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Growth, Disparities and Inclusive Development in India

Part of the book series: India Studies in Business and Economics ((ISBE))

Abstract

The access to credit (especially formal) and the incidence of indebtedness among rural households has been a matter of intense policy debate in India. A scientific and empirical understanding of changing rural credit markets and their implications on farmers’ economic welfare is critical to harness the potential of rural credit delivery mechanisms. The understanding of such issues at decentralized level based on micro-level evidence will also be useful in reorienting the credit policies and programmes for a better impact. In this context, the present study was undertaken to (i) analyse the changes in the structure of rural credit delivery in Uttar Pradesh (UP), (ii) identify the factors that influence the choice of credit sources in UP and (iii) assess the impact of access to credit on farmers’ welfare. The study is based on the unit level data of Debt and Investment Survey carried out by National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) during 1992 (48th round), 2003 (59th round) and 2013 (70th round) and the farmers’ situation assessment survey carried out in 2013 (70th round). The structure of credit system has been assessed in terms of access of rural households to different credit outlets, share of formal credit institutions, availability of credit and interest rate. The determinants of rural households’ choice for credit sources in UP were analysed by using Heckman selection model, and the impact of farmers’ access to formal credit was examined by using instrumental variable model. The structure of credit market has changed overtime, and the share of institutional credit has increased. The initiatives taken by the government have paid off, and the flow of institutional credit to rural areas has increased significantly even in real terms. The indicators of financial inclusion have shown a sign of improvement. However, the presence of informal agencies in the disbursement of rural credit in UP is still intact. Rural households’ access to institutional credit is influenced by a number of socio-economic, institutional and policy factors. In our analysis, the education, caste affiliation, gender and assets ownership have been found to influence the rural households’ access to institutional credit significantly. Conditioned on participation, the access to formal agricultural credit has a significant positive impact on farming households’ economic welfare. A concerted effort and appropriate policy reform are required to make rural households’ access to institutional credit neutral to caste, class and regions to realize the potential impact of agricultural credit on farmers’ economic welfare.

Some sections of this chapter draw from the authors’ previous works which was earlier published in 2017 as “Institutional versus non-institutional credit to agricultural households in India: Evidence on impact from a national farmers’ survey”, co-authored by Anjani Kumar, Ashok K. Mishra, Sunil Saroj and P. K. Joshi, in Vol. 41, issue 3, pp. 420–432 of Elsevier journal Economic Systems. The original study can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2016.10.005.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Awotide, B. A., Abdoulaye, T., Alena, A., & Manyong, V. M. (2015). Impact of access to credit on agricultural productivity: Evidence from smallholder cassava farmers in Nigeria. In Paper Presented at the International Conference of Agricultural Economists (ICAE). Milan, Italy, August 9–14, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger, H. P., & Khandker, S. (1995). The impact of formal finance on rural economy of India. The Journal of Development Studies, 32(2), 234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birthal, P. S., Joshi, P. K., Roy, D., & Thorat, A. (2013). Diversification in Indian agriculture towards high-value crops: The role of smallholders. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(2013), 61–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, R., & Pande, R. (2005). Do rural banks matter? Evidence from the Indian social banking experiment. American Economic Review, 95(3), 780–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chand, R., Prasanna, P. A. L., & Singh, A. (2011). Farm size and productivity: Understanding the strengths of smallholders and their livelihoods. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(26/27), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, B. E. (1999). The impact of group lending in Northeast Thailand. Journal of Development Economics, 60(1), 105–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conning, J., & Udry, C. (2007). Rural financial markets in developing countries. In R. Evenson & P. Pingali (Eds.), Handbook of agricultural economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, A., Senapati, M., & John, J. (2009). Impact of agricultural credit on agriculture production: An empirical analysis in India. Reserve Bank of India Occasional Papers, 30(2) (Monsoon 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Diagne, A., Zeller, M., & Sharma, M. (2000). Empirical measurements of households’ access to credit and credit constraints in developing countries: Methodological issues and evidence. Food Consumption and Nutrition Division (FCND) Discussion Paper 90. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, D. N. (2005). A policy approach for agricultural lending. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(2), 93–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golait, R. (2007). Current issues in agriculture credit in India: An assessment. Reserve Bank of India Occasional Papers, 28(1), 79–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India. (2013). Situation assessment survey of agricultural households. Unit-level data from 70th Round of National Sample Survey. New Delhi: National Sample Survey Office, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India. (2014). Key indicators of situation of agricultural households in India. Report of 70th Round of National Sample Survey, December, 2014. New Delhi: National Sample Survey Office, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India. (2016). Economic survey 2015–16. New Delhi: Ministry of Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guirkinger, C. (2008). Understanding the co-existence of formal and informal credit markets in Piura, Peru. World Development, 36(8), 1436–1452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoda, A., & Terway, P. (2015). Credit policy for agriculture in India—An evaluation. Working Paper 302, June 2015. New Delhi: Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, K., & Stieglitz, J. E. (1990). Imperfect information and rural credit markets—Puzzles and policy perspectives. World Bank Economic Review, 4(3), 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khandker, S. R., & Faruqee, R. R. (2003). The impact of farm credit in Pakistan. Agricultural Economics, 28(2003), 197–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A. (2017). Dynamics of access to rural credit in India: Patterns, determinants and implications. In S. Bathla & A. Dubey (Eds.), Changing contours of Indian agriculture. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A., Singh, D. K., & Kumar, P. (2007). Performance of rural credit and factors affecting the choice of credit sources. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62(3), 297–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A., Singh, K. M., & Sinha, S. (2010). Institutional credit to agriculture sector in India: Status, performance and determinants. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 23(2), 253–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A., Singh, R. K. P., Shivjee, J., Chand, S., Tripathi, G., & Saroj, S. (2015). Dynamics of access to rural credit in India: Patterns and determinants. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 28(Conf.), 151–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A., Mishra, A. K., Saroj, S., & Joshi, P. K. (2017). Institutional versus non-institutional credit to agricultural households in India: Evidence on impact from a national farmers’ survey. Economic Systems, 41(3), 420–432, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2016.10.005, ISSN 0939-3625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, R. (2006). Agricultural credit in India status, issues and future agenda. Economic and Political Weekly, 41(11), 1013–1021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan, S. (2016). The productivity of agricultural credit in India. Agricultural Economics, 47(2016), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • NSSO, Debt and Investment Surveys, 48th (1992). 59th (2003) and 70th (2013) rounds. National Sample Survey Office, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal, D., & Laha, A. K. (2015). Sectoral credit choice in rural India. The Journal of Choice Modelling, 14(2015), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, D. (1998). Development economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shoji, M., Aoyagi, K., Kasahara, R., Sawada, Y., & Ueyama, M. (2012). Social capital formation and credit access: Evidence from Sri Lanka. World Development, 40(12), 2522–2536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subbarao, D. (2012). Agricultural credit: Accomplishments and challenges. Speech delivered at NABARD, July 12, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anjani Kumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Annexure

Annexure

See Annexure Table 11.

Table 11 Hausman’s test for endogeneity for net farm income and household consumption expenditure

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kumar, A., Saroj, S. (2019). Access to Credit and Indebtedness Among Rural Households in Uttar Pradesh: Implications for Farm Income and Poverty. In: Mamgain, R. (eds) Growth, Disparities and Inclusive Development in India. India Studies in Business and Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6443-3_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics