Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Improved FMEA Methods for Proactive Healthcare Risk Analysis pp 73–96Cite as

FMEA Using Cluster Analysis and Prospect Theory and Its Application to Blood Transfusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The classical FMEA focuses on the risk analysis problems in which a small number of experts participate. Nowadays, with the increasing complexity of products and processes, an FMEA may require the participation of a large number of experts from distributed departments or organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdellaoui M, Bleichrodt H, Paraschiv C (2007) Loss aversion under prospect theory: a parameter-free measurement. Manage Sci 53(10):1659–1674

    Google Scholar 

  • Adhikary DD, Bose GK, Bose D, Mitra S (2014) Multi criteria FMECA for coal-fired thermal power plants using COPRAS-G. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 31(5):601–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Altuzarra A, Moreno-Jiménez JM, Salvador M (2010) Consensus building in AHP-group decision-making: a Bayesian approach. Oper Res 58(6):1755–1773

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Baghery M, Yousefi S, Rezaee MJ (2018) Risk measurement and prioritization of auto parts manufacturing processes based on process failure analysis, interval data envelopment analysis and grey relational analysis. J Intell Manuf 29(8):1803–1825

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodily SE (1979) Note—a delegation process for combining individual utility functions. Manage Sci 25(10):1035–1041

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Boje DM, Murnighan JK (1982) Group confidence pressures in iterative decisions. Manage Sci 28(10):1187–1196

    Google Scholar 

  • Braglia M, Frosolini M, Montanari R (2003) Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Qual Reliab Eng Int 19(5):425–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai CG, Xu XH, Wang P, Chen XH (2017) A multi-stage conflict style large group emergency decision-making method. Soft Comput 21(19):5765–5778

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Carpitella S, Certa A, Izquierdo J, La Fata CM (2018) A combined multi-criteria approach to support FMECA analyses: a real-world case. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 169:394–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Certa A, Hopps F, Inghilleri R, La Fata CM (2017) A Dempster-Shafer theory-based approach to the failure mode, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) under epistemic uncertainty: application to the propulsion system of a fishing vessel. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 159:69–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang CL, Wei CC, Lee YH (1999) Failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy method and grey theory. Kybernetes 28(9):1072–1080

    Google Scholar 

  • Chemweno P, Pintelon L, De Meyer A-M, Muchiri PN, Van Horenbeek A, Wakiru J (2017) A dynamic risk assessment methodology for maintenance decision support. Qual Reliab Eng Int 33(3):551–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin KS, Wang YM, Poon GKK, Yang JB (2009) Failure mode and effects analysis by data envelopment analysis. Decis Support Syst 48(1):246–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Faiella G, Parand A, Franklin BD, Chana P, Cesarelli M, Stanton NA, Sevdalis N (2018) Expanding healthcare failure mode and effect analysis: a composite proactive risk analysis approach. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 169:117–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitinavard H, Mousavi SM, Vahdani B (2017) Soft computing-based new interval-valued hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria group assessment method with last aggregation to industrial decision problems. Soft Comput 21(12):3247–3265

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero HH, Bradley JR (2013) Failure modes and effects analysis: an evaluation of group versus individual performance. Prod Oper Manag 22(6):1524–1539

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochbaum DS, Levin A (2006) Methodologies and algorithms for group-rankings decision. Manage Sci 52(9):1394–1408

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Li Z, Liu HC (2017) New approach for failure mode and effect analysis using linguistic distribution assessments and TODIM method. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 167:302–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Jee TL, Tay KM, Lim CP (2015) A new two-stage fuzzy inference system-based approach to prioritize failures in failure mode and effect analysis. IEEE Trans Reliab 64(3):869–877

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney RL (1975) Group decision-making using cardinal social welfare functions. Manage Sci 22(4):430–437

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KO, Zuo MJ (2018) General model for the risk priority number in failure mode and effects analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 169:321–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao H, Xu Z, Zeng XJ, Merigó JM (2015) Qualitative decision-making with correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Knowl-Based Syst 76:127–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu HC (2016) FMEA using uncertainty theories and MCDM methods. Springer, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Rodríguez RM (2014) A fuzzy envelope for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and its application to multicriteria decision-making. Inf Sci 258:220–238

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu HC, Liu L, Lin QL (2013a) Fuzzy failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy evidential reasoning and belief rule-based methodology. IEEE Trans Reliab 62(1):23–36

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu HC, Liu L, Liu N (2013b) Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: a literature review. Expert Syst Appl 40(2):828–838

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu HC, Fan XJ, Li P, Chen YZ (2014) Evaluating the risk of failure modes with extended MULTIMOORA method under fuzzy environment. Eng Appl Artif Intell 34:168–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu BS, Shen YH, Zhang W, Chen XH, Wang XQ (2015) An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy principal component analysis model-based method for complex multi-attribute large-group decision-making. Eur J Oper Res 245(1):209–225

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu HC, You JX, Chen S, Chen YZ (2016a) An integrated failure mode and effect analysis approach for accurate risk assessment under uncertainty. IIE Trans 48(11):1027–1042

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu HC, You JX, Li P, Su Q (2016b) Failure mode and effect analysis under uncertainty: an integrated multiple criteria decision-making approach. IEEE Trans Reliab 65(3):1380–1392

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu HC, Wang LE, You XY, Wu SM (2018a) Failure mode and effect analysis with extended grey relational analysis method in cloud setting. Total Qual Manag Bus Excel. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1337506

  • Liu HC, You JX, Shan MM, Su Q (2018b) Systematic failure mode and effect analysis using a hybrid multiple criteria decision-making approach. Total Qual Manag & Bus Excel. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1317585

  • Liu HC, You XY, Tsung F, Ji P (2018c) An improved approach for failure mode and effect analysis involving large group of experts: An application to the healthcare field. Qual Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2018.1448089

  • Liu HC, You JX, Duan CY (2019) An integrated approach for failure mode and effect analysis under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Int J Prod Econ 207:163–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y, Teng F, Zhou J, Wen A, Bi Y (2013) Failure mode and effect analysis in blood transfusion: a proactive tool to reduce risks. Transfusion 53(12):3080–3087

    Google Scholar 

  • Panchal D, Singh AK, Chatterjee P, Zavadskas EK, Keshavarz-Ghorabaee M (2019) A new fuzzy methodology-based structured framework for RAM and risk analysis. Appl Soft Comput 74:242–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeters JFW, Basten RJI, Tinga T (2018) Improving failure analysis efficiency by combining FTA and FMEA in a recursive manner. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 172:36–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillay A, Wang J (2003) Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 79(1):69–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren P, Xu Z, Hao Z (2017) Hesitant fuzzy thermodynamic method for emergency decision-making based on prospect theory. IEEE Trans Cybern 47(9):2531–2543

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez RM, Martínez L, Herrera F (2012) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision-making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20(1):109–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyed-Hosseini SM, Safaei N, Asgharpour MJ (2006) Reprioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis by decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory technique. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91(8):872–881

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE, Weaver W (1947) A mathematical theory of communication. The University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Song W, Ming X, Wu Z, Zhu B (2014) A rough TOPSIS approach for failure mode and effects analysis in uncertain environments. Qual Reliab Eng Int 30(4):473–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamatis DH (2003) Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution, 2nd edn. ASQ Quality Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J Risk Uncertain 5(4):297–323

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • von Ahsen A (2008) Cost-oriented failure mode and effects analysis. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 25(5):466–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Wang YM, Martínez L (2017) A group decision method based on prospect theory for emergency situations. Inf Sci 418–419:119–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Z, Xu J (2018) A consensus model for large-scale group decision-making with hesitant fuzzy information and changeable clusters. Information Fusion 41:217–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu XH, Zhong XY, Chen XH, Zhou YJ (2015) A dynamical consensus method based on exit-delegation mechanism for large group emergency decision-making. Knowl-Based Syst 86:237–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu PL (1973) A class of solutions for group decision problems. Manage Sci 19(8):936–946

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yue Z (2011) A method for group decision-making based on determining weights of decision makers using TOPSIS. Appl Math Model 35(4):1926–1936

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yue Z (2012) Application of the projection method to determine weights of decision makers for group decision-making. Scientia Iranica 19(3):872–878

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Xia J, Zhong Y, Pang J (2016) An improved FMEA method based on the linguistic weighted geometric operator and fuzzy priority. Qual Eng 28(4):491–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou S, Xu X, Zhou Y, Chen X (2017) A large group decision-making method based on fuzzy preference relation. Int J Inf Technol Decis-Mak 16(3):881–897

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J, Zhang S, Chen Y, Zhang L (2016) A hierarchical clustering approach based on three-dimensional gray relational analysis for clustering a large group of decision makers with double information. Group Decis Negot 25(2):325–354

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai, China

    Hu-Chen Liu

  2. College of Economics and Management, China Jiliang University, Zhejiang, China

    Hu-Chen Liu

Authors
  1. Hu-Chen Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Liu, HC. (2019). FMEA Using Cluster Analysis and Prospect Theory and Its Application to Blood Transfusion. In: Improved FMEA Methods for Proactive Healthcare Risk Analysis. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6366-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6366-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6365-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6366-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation