Abstract
This chapter focuses on bridging the gap between policy and practice in Israeli schools, in the context of implementing a national innovative policy in the area of teaching higher-order thinking (HOT) across the curriculum. The chapter elaborates on capacity building of senior instructional leaders who were national subject superintendents (NSSs), responsible for the quality of teaching, learning and assessment in specific school subjects. The model of implementation had three main features: (a) deep and long-term (3 years long) capacity building and the formation of a community of learners; (b) a balanced blend of tightness (in terms of defining the overall goal—developing students’ HOT) and looseness (in terms of autonomy as to whether and how to engage in the change process); and (c) tailoring the change process to multiple, specific educational contexts. The workshop was part of a detailed plan of a top-down implementation process addressing changes in assessment, curriculum and learning materials and professional development. It made prominent contributions to the web of interactive changes that took place in learning and instruction of many school subjects, matching an ecological model of change. The analysis shows how a top-down implementation, together with a substantial degree of autonomy, can result in rich and diverse bottom-up initiatives. The NSS workshop thus demonstrated how long-term capacity building of a group of senior educational leaders can be used as a leverage for implementing an innovative instructional change on a large, national scale.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adan, H., Ashkenazy, V., & Alperson, B. (2001). To become a citizen in Israel. Jerusalem, Israel: MOE.
Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12.
Cohen, D. K., & Barnes, C. A. (1993). Conclusion: A new pedagogy for policy? In D. K. Cohen (Ed.), Teaching for understanding: Challenges for policy and practice (pp. 240–275). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Cohen, D. K., Peurach, D. J., Glazer, J. L., Gates, K. E., & Goldin, S. (2013). Improvement by design: The promise of better schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Cuban, L. (1990). The managerial imperative and the practice of leadership in schools. Albany, NY: SUNY.
Elmore, R. C. (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Press.
Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership and sustainability. Thousand Oakes, CA: Corwin Press.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Goodlad, J., & Klein, M. (1970). Behind the classroom door. Worthington, OH: Charles A. Jones Publishing.
Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2003). Sustaining leadership. Phi Delta Kappan, 84, 693–700.
Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
Nir, A., Ben-David, A., Bogler, R., Inbar, D., & Zohar, A. (2016). School autonomy and 21st century skills in the Israeli educational system: Discrepancies between the declarative and operational levels. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(7), 1231–1246.
Office of Pedagogical Affairs, Israel Ministry of Education. (2009). Teaching Thinking Report (“Pedagogical Horizon”): 2006–2009. Jerusalem, Israel: Israel Ministry of Education. Retrieved from http://cms.education.gov.il/EducationCMS/Units/Mazkirut_Pedagogit/OfekPedagogi/Sikom/
Savin-Baden, M., & Howell-Major, C. (2013). Qualitative research: The essential guide to theory and practice. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
Spillane, J. P. (2000). Cognition and policy implementation: District policymakers and the reform of mathematics education. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 141–179.
Spillane, J. P. (2004). Standards deviation: How schools misunderstand education policy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72, 387–431.
Tamir, P. (2006). Inquiry in science education and its reflection in the Israeli biology teaching. In A. Zohar (Ed.), Learning by inquiry: An ongoing challenge (pp. 15–56). Jerusalem, Israel: Magnes.
Zohar, A. (2008). Teaching thinking on a national scale: Israel’s pedagogical horizons. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 77–81.
Zohar, A. (2013). It’s not all about test scores: Reviving pedagogical discourse. Bnei Brak, Israel: Poalim – Hakibutz Hameuchad. (in Hebrew).
Zohar, A., & Cohen, A. (2016). Large scale implementation of higher order thinking (HOT) in civic education: The interplay of policy, politics, pedagogical leadership and detailed pedagogical planning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 85–96.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zohar, A. (2019). Wide-Scale Implementation Through Capacity Building of Senior Leaders: The Case of Teaching Thinking in Israeli Schools. In: Hung, D., Lee, SS., Toh, Y., Jamaludin, A., Wu, L. (eds) Innovations in Educational Change. Education Innovation Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6330-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6330-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6328-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6330-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)