Abstract
In order to develop meaningful mathematics activities for students to enjoy learning and to improve their learning, the mathematics-grounding activity (MGA) modules are developed as part of the JUST DO MATH project which has been funded by the Taiwanese Ministry of Education since 2014. The project consists of three phases: (1) research and development of the MGA modules; (2) cascading to include more teachers and designers; and (3) dissemination to students in Mathematics Camps. The evaluation of the project is still ongoing. Both student feedback and teacher feedback are collected during the MGA modules. At the current stage, data from both qualitative and quantitative results show significant positive influence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ausubel, D. P. (1961). In defense of verbal learning. Educational Theory, 11, 15–25.
Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. S. (1964). The course of cognitive growth. American Psychologist, 19(1), 1–15.
Dienes, Z. (1973). The six stages in the process of learning mathematics. Windsor Berks, U.K.: NFER Publishing.
Fischbein, E. (1982). Intuition and proof. For the Learning of Mathematics, 3(2), 9–18, 24.
Garden, R. A. (1987). The second IEA mathematics study. Comparative Education Review, 31(1), 47–68.
Howson, G., Keitel, C., & Kilpatrick, J. (1981). Curriculum development in mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lin, F.-L. (2015). Conceptualizing quality mathematics education. In Plenary Panel at the 7th East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education. May 11–15, 2015, Cebu, Philippines.
Lin, F.-L., & Chang, Y.-P. (in press). Mathematics teachers professional development in Taiwan. In B. Kaur & C. Vistro-Yu (Eds.), Mathematics Education—An Asian perspective. Singapore: Springer.
Lin, F.-L., Hsu, H.-Y., & Chen, J.-C. (in press). Lighten-up, school-based program: An innovation for facilitating professional growth of Taiwanese in-service mathematics teachers. In B. Kaur & C. Vistro-Yu (Eds.), Mathematics Education—An Asian perspective. Singapore: Springer.
Lin, F.-L., Wang, T.-Y. (2016). A model to facilitates student engagement in learning mathematics: A large-scale project in Taiwan. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Lin, F.-L., Wang, T.-Y., & Yang, K.-L. (2016). Transformative cascade model for mathematics teacher professional development. In Proceeding of the 13th International Congress on Mathematics Education.
Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V.S., Foy, P. in collaboration with Olson, J. F., Preuschoff, C., Erberber, E., Arora, A., & Galia, J. (2008). TIMSS 2007 international mathematics report: Findings from IEA’s trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
Mullis, I. V.S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 technical report. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing.
Robitaille, D. F., Schmidt, W. H., Raizen, S. A., McKnight, C. C., Britton, E., & Nicol, C. (1993). Curriculum frameworks for mathematics and science (TIMSS Monograph No. 1). Vancouver: Pacific Educational Press.
Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., Houang, R. T., Wang, H., Wiley, D. E., Cogan, L. S., et al. (2001). Why schools matter: A cross-national comparison of curriculum and learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Shapiro, J. (2014). 5 Things you need to know about the future of math. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/jordanshapiro/2014/07/24/5-things-you-need-to-know-about-the-future-of-math/.
Skemp, R. R. (1987). The psychology of learning mathematics (Expanded American ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Psychology Press.
Skemp, R. R. (1989). Mathematics in the primary school. London: Routledge Palmer.
Stavy, R., & Tirosh, D. (2000). How students (mis-)understand science and mathematics: Intuitive rules. New York: Teachers College Press.
Tirosh, D., & Stavy, R. (1999). Intuitive rules: A way to explain and predict students’ reasoning. Educational Studies Mathematics, 38, 51–66.
Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. T. (2002). According to the book: Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix. Examples of MGA Modules
Appendix. Examples of MGA Modules
1.1 SQUARING THE SQUARES AND RECTANGLES
-
I.
Materials
-
A set of several shapes of squares with areas x2 and 1, and rectangles with area x (width and length are 1 and x).
-
Record sheet (4 for each group).
-
Task sheet (4 for each group).
-
Learning feedback sheet (4 for each group).
-
-
II.
Contents of the Activity
To develop students’ mental image of the ‘method of completing the square’ through manipulating the algebraic numbers represented in ‘shapes,’ before learning the topic of factorization in school. This MGA module is suitable for 8th graders or 7th graders.
-
Students can square the given pieces (the big squares of x2, the rectangles of x, and the small squares of (1) to a new square.
-
Students can find out the number of the rest small squares in order to complete the full square through group discussion.
-
III.
Procedures
-
0.
Observation and discussion of the shapes and areas of three different shapes.
-
1.
Preparation Activities: to construct and discuss the examples and non-examples of squaring new squares, i.e., the relationship between \( x^{2} + bx + c\quad {\text{and}}\quad (x + q )^{2} \).
-
2.
Exploration and Reasoning Activities: Game competitions.
-
IV.
Tasks and Feedback Collections
1.2 THE ISOMETRIC GEOBOARD
-
I.
Materials
-
An isometric geoboard for each group.
-
The rubber bands (10 for each group).
-
The game map.
-
The cards of Chance and Opportunity (9 for each).
-
Task sheet (1 for each group).
-
Learning feedback sheet (1 for each group).
-
-
II.
Contents of the Activity
To develop students’ mental image of square’s length with irrational number through manipulating the isometric geoboard before learning the topic of square root in school curriculum. The module is suitable for 7th graders or beyond.
-
Students can surround the squares of given areas in the isometric geoboard.
-
Student can surround the various squares of within a range of areas in the isometric geoboard.
-
The core notion of this MGA module is that student can surround the square of the length in irrational number through the experimental manipulation.
-
III.
Procedures
-
1.
Preparation Activities: to surround a rotatable square on the isometric geoboard and discuss the following question:
-
(1)
Why the surrounded quadrangle is a square?
-
(2)
How to calculate its area?
-
(3)
Is there any other way to surround the square with the same area?
-
2.
Game competition (with the given rules embedded).
-
IV.
Tasks and Feedback Collections
1.3 NUMBER BINGO
-
I.
Materials
-
A set of number cards for 2 and 4 BINGO game: 28 cards of numbers 2 and 4 each; 4 cards of the joker; 1 card of numbers 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, and 32 each.
-
A set of number cards for 5 and 10 BINGO game: 28 cards of numbers 5 and 10 each; 4 cards of the joker; 1 card of numbers 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, and 80 each.
-
A set of number cards for 3 and 6 BINGO game: 28 cards of numbers 3 and 6 each; 4 cards of the joker; 1 card of numbers 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, and 48 each.
-
Task sheets for each group.
-
Learning feedback sheet for each individual.
-
-
II.
Contents of the Activity
To develop the prerequisites of solving the specific algebraic problem: a cage of chickens and rabbits for 5th graders or beyond.
-
Students can find the numerical pattern with difference 2 from 2 and 4 BINGO game.
-
Students can find the numerical pattern with difference 5 from 5 and 10 BINGO game.
-
Students can find the numerical pattern with difference 3 from 3 and 6 BINGO game.
-
III.
Procedures
-
1.
Preparation Activities: to play with 2 and 4 BINGO game to be familiar with its rules, and to discuss how to speed up the game in the end.
-
2.
Exploration Activities: to play with 5 and 10 BINGO game, and to discuss how to play with the corresponding biggest and smallest numbers of BINGO card in the end of the game.
-
3.
Reasoning Activities: to play with 3 and 6 BINGO game, and to discuss in the end of game that whether it is possible the number of the BINGO card is 28 in the condition of every players get 8 cards.
-
IV.
Tasks and Feedback Collections
1.4 A SEVEN-PIECE PUZZLE
-
I.
Materials
-
A set of a seven-piece puzzle for each individual.
-
Record sheet.
-
Task and learning feedback sheets for each individual.
-
-
II.
Contents of the Activity
To develop the prerequisites of manipulating with geometric kits for benefiting the understanding of area formulae of triangles, quadrilaterals, and trapezoid for 3rd graders or beyond.
-
Students can understand the components of the seven-piece puzzle and have the preliminary understanding of its composite figures.
-
Students can apply the relationship among the components to construct new combinations of those components reasonably.
-
The core notion of this MGA module is to strengthen students’ concrete experiences in manipulating the geometric shapes and understand the area formulae of triangles, parallelograms, and trapezoids.
-
III.
Procedures
-
1.
Preparation Activities: to practice the basic skills of movement, flip, and rotation with a seven-piece puzzle kit.
-
2.
Exploration Activities: to explore the pieces of geometric shapes of the puzzle about their names, elements, and the relationship among elements (note: the trapezoid and parallelogram are not learned yet by students, it is suggested to discuss visually). The exploration is sequentially focused on:
-
(1)
Classification of the pieces of geometric shapes.
-
(2)
The base side and the height.
-
(3)
Practice with the given 2 or 3 pieces to compound a new composite figure.
-
3.
Reasoning Activities (playing the game to compound figures).
-
IV.
Tasks and Feedback Collections
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lin, FL., Chang, YP. (2019). Research and Development of Mathematics-Grounding Activity Modules as a Part of Curriculum in Taiwan. In: Vistro-Yu, C., Toh, T. (eds) School Mathematics Curricula. Mathematics Education – An Asian Perspective. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6312-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6312-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6310-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6312-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)