Abstract
Higher Education policy for student learning and employability is written in such a way that the performance of people is often separated from machines, through the structure of words. This hampers critical understandings of how humans and technologies mutually constitute each other. Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) of a large quantity of policy from the past two decades reveals frequent attribution of human labour to a series of buzzwords, the suggestion that technology will ‘fix’ societal issues and a treatment of students as a series of ‘parts’. Though institutions have been active in producing student ‘employability’ and ‘learning gain’ strategies on concerns of technological unemployment , they are noticeably silent. The instrumental routes students are encouraged to take through university will not guarantee future work . This article, therefore, examines first, the problem of taken-for-granted visions of neoliberal social development related to education , technology , and employment . Second, it considers the role of education in a digital age of potential mass technological unemployment . New understandings that encourage a symbiosis between humans and machines are drawn from posthumanist theory. Universities urgently need new policies for cooperation between humans and technology , rather than driving separation between them. However, this requires acknowledgement of the future of human work as co-evolving with our technologies, and not separate from them.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Aberystwyth University e-Learning Strategy. (2005–2009). https://www.aber.ac.uk/en/academic/e-learning/part-6/. Accessed August 26, 2018.
Anglia Ruskin University. (2015–2018). Employability Strategy. Available at: https://web.anglia.ac.uk/anet/student_services/public/ARU_Employability_Strategy_2015-18.pdf.
Aoun, R. (2017). Robot-proof: Higher education in the age of artificial intelligence. London: The MIT Press.
Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. London: Continuum.
Bartholomew, P., & Hayes, S. (2015). An introduction to technology-enhanced learning policy. In J. Branch, P. Bartholomew, & C. Nygaard (Eds.), Technology enhanced learning in higher education (pp. 17–29). London: Libri Publishing.
Bostrom, N. (2009). Why I want to be a posthuman when I grow up. In B. Gordijn & R. Chadwick (Eds.), Medical enhancement and posthumanity. New York: Springer.
Brookfield, S. (1986). Understanding and facilitating adult learning. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2011). Race against the machine: How the digital revolution is accelerating innovation, driving productivity, and irreversibly transforming employment and the economy. Lexington, MA: Digital Frontier Press.
Campbell, N., O’Driscoll, A., & Saren, M. (2010). The posthuman: The end and the beginning of the human. Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review, 9(2), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.306.
Couldry, N. (2010). Why voice matters: Culture and politics after neoliberalism. Sage publications.
Czerniewicz, L., & Rother, K. (2018). Institutional educational technology policy and strategy documents: An inequality gaze. Research in Comparative and International Education, 13(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499918761708.
Dewey, J. (1916). Progress. The International Journal of Ethics, 26(3), 311–322.
Dinerstein, J. (2006). Technology and its discontents: On the verge of the posthuman. American Quarterly, 58(3), 569–595. https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2006.0056.
Doucet, A., Evers, J., Guerra, E., Lopez, N., Soskil, M., & Timmers, K. (2018). Teaching in the fourth industrial revolution: Standing at the precipice. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textural analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
Fendler, L. (2008). Educationalising trends in societies of control: Assessments, problem-based learning and empowerment. In P. Smeyers & M. Depaepe (Eds.), Educational research: The educationalization of social problems (pp. 47–59). Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media.
Finlayson, G., & Hayward, D. (2010). Education towards heteronomy: A critical analysis of the reform of UK universities since 1978. www.sussex.ac.uk/Users/jgf21/eth/finalversion.pdf. Accessed August 7, 2018.
Frey, C. A., & Osborne, M. A. (2013). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf. Accessed July 17, 2018.
Frey, C. A., & Osborne, M. A. (2015). Technology at work: The future of innovation and employment. http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/reports/Citi_GPS_Technology_Work.pdf. Accessed July 17, 2018.
Gregg, M. (2013). Work’s intimacy. Wiley.
Halberstam, J., & Livingston, I. (1995). Posthuman bodies: unnatural acts: Theorizing the performative. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Arnold.
Hayes, S. (2014). Counting on technology to enhance learning. In P. Jandrić & D. Boras (Eds.), Education and the network: A critical encounter. London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13752-0_2.
Hayes, S. (2015). Encouraging the intellectual craft of living research: Tattoos, theory and time. In P. Bartholomew, C. Guerin, & C. Nygaard (Eds.), Learning to research: Researching to learn. London: Libri.
Hayes, S. (2016). Learning from a deceptively spacious policy discourse. In T. Ryberg, C. Sinclair, S. Bayne, & M. de Laat (Eds.), Research, boundaries, and policy in networked learning (pp. 23–40). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31130-2_2.
Hayes, S. (2017). Introducing the concept of ‘a corresponding curriculum’ to transform academic identity and practice. In A. Hørsted, J. Branch, & C. Nygaard (Eds.), Learning-centred curriculum design in higher education. London: Libri.
Hayes, S. (2018). Invisible labour: Do we need to reoccupy student engagement policy? Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.3167/latiss.2018.110102.
Hayes, S. (2019). The labour of words in higher education. Leiden: Brill.
Hayes, S., & Bartholomew, P. (2015). Where’s the humanity? Challenging the policy discourse of technology enhanced learning. In J. Branch, P. Bartholomew, & C. Nygaard (Eds.), Technology enhanced learning in higher education (pp. 113–133). London: Libri Publishing.
Hayes, S., & Jandrić, P. (2014). Who is really in charge of contemporary education? People and technologies in, against and beyond the neoliberal university. Open Review of Educational Research, 1(1), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2014.989899.
Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE). (2018). Learning Gain National Conference. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/HEFCE,2014/Content/Events/2018/Learning%20Gain%20conf%20agenda%207%20Feb%202018.pdf. Accessed July 28, 2018.
Jandrić, P., & Hayes, S. (2019). The postdigital challenge of redefining education from the margins. Learning, Media and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1585874.
Lawrence, D. R. (2017). The edge of human? The problem with the posthuman as the ‘beyond’. Bioethics, 31(3), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12318.
MacKenzie, D., & Wajcman, J. (1999). The social shaping of technology. Open University Press.
Marx, K. (1867). Capital: A critique of political economy. http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Capital-Volume-I.pdf. Accessed July 2, 2018.
Marx, K. (1976). Capital, Vol. I, translated by Ben Fowkes.
Matthewman, S. (2011). Technology and social theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Nedelkoska, L., & Quintini, G. (2018). Automation, skills use and training. In OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 202, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Peters, M. A., Jandrić, P., & Hayes, S. (2019). The curious promise of educationalising technological unemployment: What can places of learning really do about the future of work? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(3), 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1439376.
Price, L., & Kirkwood, A. (2010). Technology enhanced learning–where’s the evidence. In Proceedings Ascilite Sydney Curriculum, Technology & Transformation for an Unknown Future (pp. 772–782).
Rikowski, G. (2003). Alien life: Marx and the future of the human. Historical Materialism, 11(2), 121–164. https://doi.org/10.1163/156920603768311255.
Ross, A. (2008). The new geography of work: Power to the precarious? Theory, Culture and Society, 25(7), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276408097795.
Selwyn, N., Gorard, S., & Williams, S. (2001). The role of the ‘technical fix’ in UK lifelong education policy. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 20(4), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370117679.
Shore, C., & Wright, S. (1999). Audit culture and anthropology: Neo-liberalism in British higher education. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 557–575. https://doi.org/10.2307/2661148.
Simpson, P., & Mayr, A. (2010). Language and power. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Skoulding, L. (2017, May 5). Report: The UK universities offering best value for money. Student News. Retrieved from http://www.savethestudent.org/news/revealed-which-universities-offer-students-best-value-for-money.html. Accessed July 28, 2018.
Smyth, J. (2017). The toxic university: Zombie leadership, academic rock stars and neoliberal ideology. Springer.
Snaza, N., & Weaver, J. (Eds.). (2014). Posthumanism and educational research. Routledge.
University of Bolton. (2014–2017). Employability and Enterprise Strategy. Available at: Employability-Strategy-2014-2017—University of Bolton.https://www.bolton.ac.uk/CSE-Award/.../Employability-Strategy-2014-2017.docx.
University of Bradford Employability Strategy. (2012–2015). Retrieved from https://www.bradford.ac.uk/studentexperience/media/academicdevelopment/documents/Employability-Strategy-(Revised-September-2014).pdf. Accessed July 18, 2018.
University of Surrey Technology Enhanced Learning Strategy. (2013–2017). Retrieved from: https://www.surrey.ac.uk/tel/files/University%20of%20Surrey%20TEL%20strategy%20v1_5%20web.pdf. Accessed July 18, 2018.
University of Westminster. (2015–2020). University of Westminster Employability Strategy. Available at: University of Westminster Employability Strategy 2015–2020. https://www.westminster.ac.uk/file/16051/download?token=jgJz3rW8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hayes, S. (2019). ‘Employable Posthumans’: Developing HE Policies that Strengthen Human Technological Collaboration not Separation. In: Peters, M., Jandrić, P., Means, A. (eds) Education and Technological Unemployment. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6225-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6225-5_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6224-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6225-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)