Abstract
I draw on outstanding research to substantiate that the circumvention of deep recessions enhances end results in the labour market greatly over lengthy periods of time, but the failure in identifying substitute employment for displaced personnel may take place notwithstanding the indisputable flexibility of current the labour market. Technological change has influenced organized labour markets considerably, stimulating substantial alterations in the sectoral model of employment over time. The position that will be elaborated in this chapter is that jobs throughout the economy are not proportionately liable to being dislocated by technology and automation . Routine or expected tasks are more prone to dislodgment than non-routine ones. A synthesis of the extant literature suggests that automation is likely to remove jobs. In contrast, the invention of novel intricate tasks generates new jobs. My analyses indicate that with ascending levels of education , individuals have succeeded in becoming proficient at such sophisticated tasks (the ones that are not invalidated by automation are frequently integrated by it). The intensifying complexity of machines may annihilate the invention of such tasks, and consequently, machines may be an alternative for all human tasks.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018). Artificial intelligence, automation and work. In A. Agarwal, A. Goldfarb, & J. Gans (Eds.), The economics of artificial intelligence. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Autor, D. H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.3.3.
Bessen, J. (2018). AI and jobs: The role of demand. In A. Agarwal, A. Goldfarb, & J. Gans (Eds.), The economics of artificial intelligence. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Calvino, F., & Virgillito, M. E. (2018). The innovation–employment nexus: A critical survey of theory and empirics. Journal of Economic Surveys, 32(1), 83–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12190.
Fleissner, C. (2018). Inclusive capitalism based on binary economics and positive international human rights in the age of artificial intelligence. Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 17(1), 201–244.
Fleming, P. (2018). Robots and organization studies: Why robots might not want to steal your job. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618765568.
Fonseca, T., Lima, F., & Pereira, S. C. (2018). Understanding productivity dynamics: A task taxonomy approach. Research Policy, 47(1), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.11.004.
Gruen, D. (2017). The future of work. Policy, 33(3), 3–8.
Healy, J., Nicholson, D., & Parker, J. (2017). Guest editors’ introduction: Technological disruption and the future of employment relations. Labour and Industry: A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work, 27(3), 157–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10301763.2017.1397258.
Hughes, J. (2017). Algorithms and posthuman governance. Journal of Posthuman Studies, 1(2), 166–184. https://doi.org/10.5325/jpoststud.1.2.0166.
Hyers, D., & Kovacova, M. (2018). The economics of the online gig economy: Algorithmic hiring practices, digital labor-market intermediation, and rights for platform workers. Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management, 6(1), 160–165. https://doi.org/10.22381/PIHRM6120187.
Koppel, J., & Kolencik, J. (2018). The future of workers: Contingent forms of labor contracting in the platform economy. Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management, 6(1), 172–177. https://doi.org/10.22381/PIHRM6120189.
Lăzăroiu, G. (2015a). Employee motivation and job performance. Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations, 14, 97–102.
Lăzăroiu, G. (2015b). Work motivation and organizational behavior. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 7(2), 66–75.
Means, A. J. (2017). Education for a post-work future: Automation, precarity, and stagnation. Knowledge Cultures, 5(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.22381/KC5120173.
Mihăilă, R., Gregova, E., Janoskova, K., Kolencik, J., & Arsene, A. M. (2018). The instrumental function of gendered citizenship and symbolic politics in the social construction of labor rights for migrants. Journal of Research in Gender Studies, 8(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.22381/JRGS8220187.
Naastepad, C. W. M., & Mulder, J. M. (2018). Robots and us: Towards an economics of the ‘Good Life’. Review of Social Economy. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2018.1432884.
Nica, E. (2018). Gig-based working arrangements: Business patterns, labor-management practices, and regulations. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 13(1), 100–105.
Nica, E., Comănescu, M., & Manole, C. (2017a). Digital reputation and economic trust in the knowledge labor market. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 5(3), 83–88.
Nica, E., Manole, C., & Brișcariu, R. (2016). The detrimental consequences of perceived job insecurity on health and psychological well-being. Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management, 4(1), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.22381/PIHRM4120169.
Nica, E., Potcovaru, A.-M., & Mirică (Dumitrescu), C.-O. (2017b). Job loss, unemployment, and perceived job insecurity: Their effects on individuals’ health and well-being. Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management, 5(2), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.22381/PIHRM5220179.
Nica, E., Potcovaru, A.-M., & Mirică (Dumitrescu), C.-O. (2017c). A question of trust: Cognitive capitalism, digital reputation economy, and online labor market. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 12(3), 64–69. https://doi.org/10.22381/EMFM12320174
Peters, M. A., & Jandrić, P. (2019). Education and technological unemployment in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. In S. Crump, A. Drew, & G. Redding (Eds.), Oxford handbook of comparative higher education systems and university management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peters, M. A., Jandrić, P., & Hayes, S. (2019). The curious promise of educationalising technological unemployment: What can places of learning really do about the future of work? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(3), 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1439376.
Popescu, G. H. (2018). Participation in the sharing economy: Labor, exchange, and consumption. An empirical analysis. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 6(1), 122–127.
Popescu, G. H., & Alpopi, C. (2017). The EMU and labor market politics: An update. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 12(2), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.22381/EMFM12220176.
Popescu, G. H., Comănescu, M., & Manole, C. (2017). Mobile knowledge work, information routines, and digital technologies. Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management, 5(2), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.22381/PIHRM5220178.
Popescu, G. H., Comănescu, M., & Sabie, O. M. (2016). The role of human capital in the knowledge-networked economy. Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management, 4(1), 168–174. https://doi.org/10.22381/PIHRM4120168.
Smith, S., & Kubala, P. (2018). Social justice in the workplace: Are on-demand companies exploiting current regulatory ambiguities and workforce precarity? Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management, 6(1), 166–171. https://doi.org/10.22381/PIHRM6120188.
Spencer, D. A. (2018). Fear and hope in an age of mass automation: Debating the future of work. New Technology, Work and Employment, 33(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12105.
Susskind, R., & Susskind, D. (2015). The future of the professions: How technology will transform the work of human experts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, L., & Kliestikova, J. (2018). The operational coherence of the workforce-as-a-service pattern: Digitally mediated service work, the contingency of on-demand employment, and the low-income labor market. Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management, 6(1), 178–183. https://doi.org/10.22381/PIHRM61201810.
Ugur, M., Churchill, S. A., & Solomon, E. (2018). Technological innovation and employment in derived labour demand models: A hierarchical meta-regression analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys, 32(1), 50–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12187.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lăzăroiu, G. (2019). Educating for a Workless Society: Technological Advance, Mass Unemployment and Meaningful Jobs. In: Peters, M., Jandrić, P., Means, A. (eds) Education and Technological Unemployment. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6225-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6225-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6224-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6225-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)