Skip to main content
  • 245 Accesses

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to discuss population and urbanization growth in the Brazilian Cerrado. The chapter begins with a brief overview of the role that cities and urban networks play in the development process, which is then applied to the analysis of the Brazilian case. It pays particular attention to the effects of the growth process in the Cerrado, analyzing population growth, migration and the urbanization network in the region. It also proposes a typology for understanding the region’s uneven urbanization and growth, articulating how economic development and incorporation occurred within a particular agricultural model (the ‘Green Revolution’), along with different population patterns.

Prepared for the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Production of beef that is salted and dried in the sun was common during the second half of the 19th century. Preparing the meat this way allowed it to last longer.

  2. 2.

    The term ‘central countries’ here is used mainly based on the center-periphery thesis proposed by Prebisch (1950), Singer (1950). The hypothesis is that the core capitalist countries concentrate on industrial and technological innovation processes, while periphery countries specialize in producing and exporting commodities (see Toye and Toye 2003). The theory has been adapted to fit different regional scales within countries or regions (Pike et al. 2016). There are many works that still demonstrate the validity of the hypothesis (see Ocampo and Parra 2010, among others). The work of Prebisch (1950) marks the origins of ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and Caribbean) and of the Latin Americas Structuralism School of Economic Thought (Love 2005).

  3. 3.

    This process is linked to the so-called Green Revolution as formulated originally by Hayami and Ruttan (1971).

  4. 4.

    For a more detailed analysis of the process see Diniz (2006), Alves and Contini (1992), França (1984), Palhano (1982), Goodman (1978).

  5. 5.

    Net migration was calculated using microdata from the 2010 Census. An array of 5565 × 5565 was built, from which it was possible to obtain a person’s residence municipality on July 31, 2005 and on July 31, 2010. As a result, the data shows only migrants on a fixed date; in other words, migrants who had been living in another municipality five years ago. People who migrated between 2005 and 2010 are not shown.

  6. 6.

    For a comparison between public agriculture researchers see Bin et al. (2013).

  7. 7.

    See, for example, Müller (1982), Delgado (1985), Kageyama et al. (1990).

  8. 8.

    See Diniz (2006) for a more details on those programs. See Osada (1999) and Ministério da Agricultura Pecuária e Abastecimento, Brasil (2004) for a detailed analysis of PRODECER.

  9. 9.

    Difference between birth and death rates.

  10. 10.

    Only areas in the Cerrado region have been considered.

References

  • Alves, E., and E. Contini. 1992. “A Modernização da Agricultura Brasileira” [The Moderrnization of Brazilian Agriculture]. In Os Principais Problemas da Agricultura Brasileira: Análise eSsugestões [The Main Problems of Brazilian Agriculture: Analysis and Suggestions], edited by A. S. P. Brandão, 49–98. IPEA Séries PNPE, 18. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrade, T. A., and R. V. Serra. 1998. O Crescimento Econômico das Cidades Médias Brasileiras [The Economic Growth of Brazilian Mid-Size Cities]. Discussion Paper No. 592. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bin, A., C. Gianoni, P. J. V. Mendes, C. Rio, S. L. M. Salles-Filho, and L. M. Capanema. 2013. “Organization of Research and Innovation: A Comparative Study of Public Agricultural Research.” Journal of Technology, Management & Innovation 8 (Supp. 1): 209–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandão, C. A. 1989. “Triângulo: Capital Comercial, Geopolítica e Agro-indústria.” Master Dissertation, CEDEPLAR/UFMG, Belo Horizonte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (ed.). 2013. Implosions/Explosions: Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization. Berlin: Jovis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campolina, B. 2016. “A Estrutura do Sistema de Inovação em Ciências Agrárias no Brasil” [The Structure of Inovation System on Agricultural Science in Brazil]. In Sistemas Setoriais de Inovação e Infraestrutura de Pesquisa no Brasil [Sectoral Inovations Systems and the Research Infrastructure in Brazil], edited by F. De Negri and F. H. S. Squeff, 419–464. Brasília: IPEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro, A. C. C., and M. G. D. Fonseca. 1995. A Dinâmica Agroindustrial do Centro-Oeste [The Agroindustrial Dynamic in the Center-West]. Brasília: IPEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christaller, W. (1940) 1966. Central Places in Southern Germany. Translated by Carlisle W. Baskin. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, W. M. 2001. O Estado e as Políticas territoriais no Brasil [The State and Territorial Policy in Brazil], 10th ed. São Paulo: Contexto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, G. C. 1985. Capital Financeiro e Agricultura no Brasil [Financial Capital and Agriculture in Brazil]. São Paulo: Ícone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diniz, B. P. C. 2005. “Território e Nação” [Territory and Nations]. In Brasil: O Estado de uma Nação [Brazil: The Status of the Nation], edited by F. Rezende and P. Tafner, 159–197. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diniz, B. P. C. 2006. O Grande Cerrado do Brasil Central: Geopolítica e Economia [The Great Brazilian Savanna of Central Brazil: Geopolitics and Economy]. PhD Dissertation, São Paulo: FFLCH/Departamento de Geografia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egler, C. A. 2001. “Mudanças Recentes e Perspectivas da Urbanização em Nível Mundial e no Brasil” [Recent Trends and Perspective of Urbanization in the World and in Brazil]. In Caracterização e Tendência da rede Urbana do Brasil: Estudos Básicos para a Caracterização da Rede Urbana [Descriptions and Trends of Brazilian Urbana Network: Basic Studies for the Description of Urban Network], vol. 2, 21–42, IPEA/IBGE/UNICAMP (NESUR). Brasília: IPEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faissol, S., et al. 1978. Tendências Atuais na Geografia Urbano/Regional: Teorização e Quantificação [Current Trends in Urban/Regional Geography: Theorizations an Quantifications]. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • França, M. 1984. O Cerrado e a Evolução Recente da Agricultura Capitalista: A Experiência de Minas Gerais [Cerrado and the Recent Evolution of Capitalist Agriculture: Minas Gerais Experiment]. PhD Dissertation, CEDEPLAR/UFMG, Belo Horizonte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, P. P. 1963. Evolução da Rede Urbana Brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Educacionais/Instituto Nacional de Estudos Pedagógicos/Ministério da Educação e Cultura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D. 1978. “Expansão da Fronteira e Colonização Rural: Recente Política de Desenvolvimento no Centro-Oeste” [Border Expansion and Rural Colonization: Recent Development Policy in the Midwest]. In Dimensões do Desenvolvimento Brasileiro [Dimensions of Brazilian Development], edited by W. Baer, P. P. Geiger, and P. R. Haddad, 301–338. Rio de Janeiro: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guimarães, E. N, and H. J. C. Leme. 1997. Caracterização Histórica e Configuração Espacial do Centro-Oeste [Historical Characterization and Spatial Configuration of the Midwest]. Discussion Paper No. 33. Campinas: Unicamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayami, Y., and V. W. Ruttan. 1971. Agricultural Development: An International Perspective. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. 1985. The Urbanization of Capital. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBGE. 1970–2010. Censos Demográficos. http://www.ibge.gov.br.

  • IBGE. 1973–2015. Produção Agrícola Municipal: Brasil [Municipal Agricultural Production]. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBGE. 1990–2015. Produção Pecuária Municipal: Brasil [Municipal Livestock Production]. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPEA/IBGE/NESUR (IE-UNICAMP). 1999. Pesquisas: Caracterização e Tendências da Rede Urbana do Brasil, vol. 1 and 2. Campinas: Universidade Estadual de Campinas.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPEA/IBGE/UNICAMP (NESUR). 2001. Caracterização e tendência da rede urbana do Brasil: estudos básicos para a caracterização da rede urbana, Vol. 2 (Série de 6 volumes). Brasília: IPEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. 1969. The Economy of Cities. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kageyama, A. A., et al. 1990. “O Novo Padrão Agrícola Brasileiro: Do Complexo Rural aos Complexos Agroindustriais.” In Agricultura e Políticas Públicas, edited by G. Delgado, J. C. Gasques, and C. Villa Verde, 113–224. Brasília: IPEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lösch, A. [1933, 1967]. The Economics of Location. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, J. L. 2005. “The Rise and Decline of Economic Structuralism in Latin America: New Dimensions.” Latin American Research Review 40 (3): 100–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martine, G. 1994. “Economia e Mobilidade Geográfica: Retrospectiva e Perspectiva para o fim do Século” [Economy and Geographic Mobility: retrospective and outlook for the end of the century]. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Populacionais [Brazilian Journal of Population Studies] 11 (1): 41–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattos, C. M. 1980. Uma Geopolítica Pan-Amazônica. Rio de Janeiro: Biblioteca do Exército.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministério da Agricultura Pecuária e Abastecimento, Brasil [Ministry of Agriculture and Food Supplies, Brazil]. 2004. PRODECER. Accessed October 2004. http://www.agricultura.gov.br.

  • Monte-Mór, R. L. 2004. O Que é o Urbano, no Mundo Contemporâneo [What’s urban in the contemporary world]. Discussion Paper. Belo Horizonte: Cedeplar/UFMG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monte-Mór, R. L. 2013. “Extended Urbanization and Settlement Patterns: An Environmental Approach.” In Implosions/Explosions: Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization, edited by N. Brenner, 260–267. Berlin: Lovis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, C. C. 1990. “Políticas Governamentais e Expansão da Agropecuária no Centro-Oeste” [Governmental Policy and Agriculture Expansion in the Middle West]. Planejamento e Políticas Públicas 3: 45–74. Brasília: IPEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, G. 1982. O Complexo AgroIndustrial Brasileiro [Brazilian Agroindustrial Complex] Núcleo de Pesquisas e Publicações, São Paulo 13 (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. [1952, 1977]. Réplica. In Economia Regional: textos escolhidos, edited by J. Schwartzman. Belo Horizonte: Cedeplar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocampo, J. A., and M. Parra. 2010. “The Terms of Trade for Commodities Since the mid-19th Century.” Journal of Iberian and Latin America Economic History 28 (1): 11–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osada, N. M. 1999. PRODECER: Projetos no Cerrado e Dívidas Agrícolas [PRODECER: Projects in the Cerrado and Agricultural Debt]. Carta Asiática. (Artigos), Núcleo de Pesquisa em Relações Internacionais. http://www.nupri.prp.usp.br/nupri/cartasia_indice.htm.

  • Palhano, M. R. N. 1982. Agricultura, Estado e Desenvolvimento Regional em Minas Gerais 1950/1980 [Agricultura, State and Regional Development in Minas Gerais 1950/80]. Texto Para Discussão 13. Belo Horizonte: Cedeplar/UFMG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, A, A. Rodríguez-Pose, and J. Tomaney. 2016. Local and Regional Development, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prebisch, R. 1950. The Economic Development of Latin America and Its Principal Problems. UN Document no. E/CN.12/89/Rev.1. Lake Success, NY: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, D. (1817) 1971. On the Principles of Political Economy, and Taxation. Middlesex: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochefort, M. 1958. “Méthodes d’études des Réseaux Urbains: Interêt de l’analyse du Secteur Tertiaire” [Study Methods of Urban Networks: interests of the tertiary sector analysis]. Annals of Geography 354: 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, M. 1979. Economia Espacial: Críticas e Alternativas [Spatial Economy: critiques and alternatives]. Série Economia e Planejamento [Series on Economy and Planning]. São Paulo: Editora Hucitec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, M. 1994. Técnica, Espaço, Tempo: Globalização e Meio Técnico-científico Informacional. Série Geografia e Realidade [Geography and Reality Series] 25. São Paulo: Editora Hucitec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. 1991. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, D. R. 1984. “Fluxo e Refluxo da Fronteira Agrícola no Brasil: Ensaio de Interpretação Estrutural e Espacial” [Flow and reflux of the agricultural frontier: structural and spatial essays]. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Populacionais [Brazilian Journal of Population Studies] Campinas 1 (1–2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, H. W. 1950. “The Distribution of Gains between Investing and Borrowing Countries.” American Economic Review 40 (2): 473–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. 2000. Postmetropolis: Critical Studies of Cities and Regions. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout, C. M. (1952) 1977. “As Exportações e o Crescimento Econômico Regional” [Exports and Regional Economic Growth]. In Economia Regional: Textos Escolhidos [Regional Economics: Selected Papers], edited by J. Schwartzman, 315–323. Belo Horizonte: CEDEPLAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toye, J., and R. Toye. 2003. “The Origins and Interpretation of the Prebisch-Singer Thesis.” History of Political Economy 35 (3): 437–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tricart, J. 1951. L’habitat Urbain. Paris: Centre de Documentation Universitaire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veiga, J. E. 2002. Cidades Imaginárias: O Brasil é Menos Urbano do que se Calcula [Imaginary cities: Brazil is less urban than whats calculated]. Campinas, SP: Editora Autores Associados.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Thünen, J. H. (1807) 1966. The Isolated State. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernardo Campolina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 JICA Research Institute

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Campolina, B. (2019). Population Growth and Urbanization in the Brazilian Cerrado. In: Hosono, A., Hamaguchi, N., Bojanic, A. (eds) Innovation with Spatial Impact: Sustainable Development of the Brazilian Cerrado. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6182-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics