Advertisement

Spatial Diffusion of the PRODECER Effects: A Macro-spatial Approach

  • Nobuaki HamaguchiEmail author
Chapter
  • 96 Downloads

Abstract

Agricultural development in the Cerrado has drastically changed the landscape of Brazil’s inland Central-West region. In the last thirty years, Brazil, starting almost from scratch, became the world’s first tropical grain producing giant.

References

  1. Almeida, Eduardo Simões de. 2005. “Função de produção agropecuária espacial.” Anáis do XLIII Congresso da Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, Ribeirão Preto.Google Scholar
  2. Alston, Julian M. 2002. “Spillovers”. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 46: 315–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alves, Eliseu. 2016. “EMBRAPA: Institutional Building and Technological Innovations Required for Cerrado Agriculture.” In Development for Sustainable Agriculture, edited by A. Hosono, C. M. C. Rocha, and Y. Hongo, pp. 139–156. New York: Palgrave Macmillan UK.Google Scholar
  4. Bustos, Paula, Bruno Caprettini, and Jacopo Ponticelli. 2016. “Agricultural productivity and structural transformation: Evidence from Brazil”. American Economic Review 106: 1320–1365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carlino, Gerald, and William R. Kerr. 2015. “Agglomeration and Innovation.” In Handbooks in Economics: Regional and Urban Economics, vol. 5A, edited by G. Duranton, J. V. Henderson, and W. Strange, pp. 349–404. New York: North Holland.Google Scholar
  6. De Mello, Marcelo. 2015. “Brasília e Goiânia no processo de modernização produtiva do Cerrado.” Caderno de Geografia, Belo Horizonte 25 (43): 1–17.Google Scholar
  7. Diniz, Bernardo Palhares Campolina. 2006. “O grande cerrado do Brasil central: geopolítica e economia.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Universidade de São Paulo.Google Scholar
  8. Fliehr, Olivia. 2013. Analysis of transportation and logistics processes for soybeans in Brazil: A case study of selected production regions. Thünen Working Paper 4. Braunschweig: Von Thünen Institute of Farm Economics.Google Scholar
  9. Garrett, Rachael D., Eric F. Lambin, and Rosamond L. Naylor. 2013. “The new economic geography of land use change: Supply chain configurations and land use in the Brazilian Amazon”. Land Use Policy 34: 265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Helfand, Steven M., and Edward S. Levine. 2004. Farm Size and the Determinants of Productive Efficiency in the Brazilian Center-West. Agricultural Economics 31: 241–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hosono, Akio, Carlos Magno Campos de Rocha, and Yutaka Hongo (eds.). 2016. Development for Sustainable Agriculture: The Brazilian Cerrado. New York: Palgrave Macmilan.Google Scholar
  12. Hosono, Akio, and Yutaka Hongo. 2016a. Establishment and Early Development: PRODECER Sets Agricultural Development in the Cerrado on Track. In Development for Sustainable Agriculture, ed. A. Hosono, C.M.C. Rocha, and Y. Hongo, 35–60. New York: Palgrave Macmillan UK.Google Scholar
  13. Hosono, Akio, and Yutaka Hongo. 2016b. Development of Cerrado Agriculture: The Path to Becoming a Major Global Breadbasket. In Development for Sustainable Agriculture, ed. A. Hosono, C.M.C. Rocha, and Y. Hongo, 61–90. New York: Palgrave Macmillan UK.Google Scholar
  14. Jepson, Wendy. 2006. Producing a Modern Agricultural Frontier: Firms and Cooperatives in Eastern Mato Grosso, Brazil. Economic Geography 82 (3): 289–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jepson, Wendy, Christian Brannstrom, and Anthony Filippi. 2010. Access Regimes and Regional Land Change in the Brazilian Cerrado, 1972–2002. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100 (1): 87–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. JICA. 2002. Japan-Brazil Agricultural Development Cooperation Programs in the Cerrado Region of Brazil—Joint Evaluation Study: General Report. Tokyo: Japan International Cooperation Agency.Google Scholar
  17. JICA Data Collection Team. 2016. Coleta de Dados para o Estado de Impactos Sócio-Economico no Desenvolvimento Agrícola do Cerrado Brasileiro [Data Collection for the Social and Economic Impact Study of Brazilian Cerrado Agricultural Development]. Tokyo: JICA.Google Scholar
  18. Kohlhepp, Gerd, and Markus Blumenschein. 2000. Brasileiros sulistas como atores da transformação rural no Centro-Oeste brasileiro: o caso de Mato Grosso. Revista Território 5 (8): 47–66.Google Scholar
  19. Oliveira, Paulo, and Robert F. Marquis. 2002. The Cerrados of Brazil: Ecology and Natural History of a Neotropical Savanna. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Papyrakis, Elissaios, and Reyer Gerlagh. 2004. The Resource Curse Hypothesis and its Transmission Channels. Journal of Comparative Economics 32: 181–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Papyrakis, Elissaios, and Reyer Gerlagh. 2007. Resource Abundance and Economic Growth in the United States. European Economic Review 51: 1011–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rocha, Betty Nogueira. 2008. “Posse da Terra e Diferenciação Social em Lucas do Rio Verde (1970–1980).” Anáis do XII, I Encontro Regional de História da Associação Nacional dos Professores Universitários de História. Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
  23. VanWey, Leah K., Stephanie Spera, Rebecca de Sa, Dan Mahr, and John F. Mustard. 2013. “Socioeconomic development and agricultural intensification in Mato Grosso”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 368: 20120168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Von Thünen, Johan Heinrich (translation by Carla M. Warternberg). 1966. Von Thünen’s Isolated State. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  25. Warnken, Philip. 1999. “Política e programas: o setor da soja no Brasil.” Revista de Política Agrícola 8 (2).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© JICA Research Institute 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Institute for Economics and Business AdministrationKobe UniversityKobeJapan

Personalised recommendations