Advertisement

Profiling and Enhancing Religious Education in Catholic Schools

  • Paul SharkeyEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Two sources inform these reflections on religious education in Catholic schools in Melbourne, Australia. The first source is a post-Conciliar theology of revelation and the second is the Enhancing Catholic School Identity (ECSI) research undertaken over the past decade by the Catholic University of Leuven (Belgium) under the auspices of the Catholic Education Commission of Victoria, Australia. The research question driving this study is: How can religious education in an Australian Catholic school respond to increasing student diversity in ways that are illuminated by a post-conciliar theology of revelation and by findings from the ECSI research? Part One of the study regards the ECSI research instruments through the lens of a Vatican II understanding of revelation. The implications of Part One for religious education are then considered in Part Two of the study. The method used to develop Part One of the chapter was a documentary analysis of relevant magisterial documents and key reports from the ECSI research. Part Two of the chapter was developed from a series of semi-structured interviews of religious educators whose practice exemplified the characteristics presented in Part One.

References

  1. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2017). Religion in Australia: 2016 census data summary. Retrieved from: http://www.abs.gov.au.
  2. Boeve, L. (2014). Orthodoxy in the postmodern context. Concilium, 2, 82–91.Google Scholar
  3. Bouma, G. (2017, June 27). Census 2016 shows Australia’s changing religious profile, with more ‘nones’ than Catholics. The Conversation.Google Scholar
  4. Congregation for Catholic Education. (2013). Educating to intercultural dialogue in Catholic schools. Retrieved from: http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/ccatheduc/documents/rc_con_ccatheduc_doc_20131028_dialogo-interculturale_en.html.
  5. Congregation for Catholic Education. (2014). Educating today and tomorrow. Retrieved from: http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/ccatheduc/documents/rc_con_ccatheduc_doc_20140407_educare-oggi-e-domani_en.html.
  6. Congregation for Catholic Education. (2017). Educating to fraternal humanism. Retrieved from: http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/ccatheduc/documents/rc_con_ccatheduc_doc_20170416_educare-umanesimo-solidale_en.html.
  7. Congregation for the Clergy. (1997). General directory for catechesis. Retrieved from: http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cclergy/documents/rc_con_ccatheduc_doc_17041998_directory-for-catechesis_en.html.
  8. Crawford, M., & Rossiter, G. (2006). Reasons for living. Camberwell: ACER Press.Google Scholar
  9. Francis, Pope. (2015). Encountering truth. New York: Image.Google Scholar
  10. Hinsdale, M. (2001). Karl Rahner’s contribution to modern Catholic thought on the child. In M. Bunge (Ed.), The child in Christian thought. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  11. Hughes, P. (2007). Putting life together. Fairfield: Fairfield Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hughes, P. (2017). Educating for purposeful living in a post-traditional age. Nunawading: Christian Research Association.Google Scholar
  13. John Paul II. (1983, March 24). The task of the Latin American bishop. Origins, 659–662.Google Scholar
  14. Mackay, H. (2016). Beyond belief. Sydney: Pan Macmillan Australia.Google Scholar
  15. Madden, R. (2017). RE curriculum in Melbourne 2016. In Religious education in Australian Catholic schools. Mulgrave: Vaughan.Google Scholar
  16. Murdoch, K. (2015). The power of inquiry. Northcote: Seastar Education.Google Scholar
  17. O’Collins, G. (2016). Revelation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pollefeyt, D. (2008). The difference of alterity. In J. De Tavernier et al. (Eds.), Responsibility, god and society (pp. 305–330). Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
  19. Pollefeyt, D. (2013). The lustre of life (English translation). Narthex, 13(1), 62–68.Google Scholar
  20. Pollefeyt, D., & Bouwens, J. (2010). Framing the identity of Catholic schools. International Studies in Catholic Education, 2(2), 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pollefeyt, D., & Bouwens, J. (2014). Identity in dialogue. Zurich: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
  22. Pope John Paul II. (1982). A letter to H.E. Cardinal Agostino Casaroli. Retrieved from: http://www.cultura.va/content/cultura/en/magistero/papa/JohnPaulII/fondazione.html.
  23. Ratzinger, J. (1966). Revelation and tradition. In K. Rahner, & J. Ratzinger (Eds.), Revelation and tradition (pp. 26–49) (W. O’Hara, Trans.). London: Burns and Oates.Google Scholar
  24. Ritchhart, R. (2017). Culture of thinking resources. Retrieved from: http://www.ronritchhart.com/COT_Resources.html.
  25. Rymarz, R. (2017). Teacher pilgrims at WYD. Unpublished report.Google Scholar
  26. Sharkey, P. (2013). Hermeneutics and the mission of the Catholic school. In T. D’Orsa & J. D’Orsa (Eds.), Leading for mission. Mulgrave: Vaughan Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. Sharkey, P. (2015). Educator’s guide to Catholic identity. Mulgrave: Vaughan Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Sharkey, P. (2017). Understanding the CECV Leuven research. In R. Rymarz & A. Belmonte (Eds.), Religious education in Australian Catholic schools. Vaughan: Mulgrave.Google Scholar
  29. Taylor, C. (1991). The ethics of authenticity. Cambridge: Harvard.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Catholic Education MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations