Skip to main content

Who Said This?’ Negotiating the Ethics and Politics of Co-authorship in Community Text-Making

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 872 Accesses

Abstract

Over the past decade, while working as an independent research-writer, I sought to embrace the inspirations and challenges of critical methodologies in various community assignments. I developed an approach to community text-making that situates community storytellers as co-researchers and primary authors of their texts. I used this approach to co-author many community narratives—books and case stories—with community elders, leaders and others working for social change and social justice. In 2015, during the community assignment that is the topic of this chapter, I began to rethink the ethics and politics at play in co-authorship. How should I attribute authorship for the prose, poetry and wisdom I crafted from stories generated in narrative inquiry co-research conversations? What do the words with and and represent when included in a list of co-authors? How should I represent my own authorial work? In this chapter, I tell the story of making a beautiful book that I co-authored with six community leaders working in a predominantly Māori and Pasifika community in urban New Zealand. I offer critical insights on different forms of authorial attribution and consider how relationships (between the co-authors and with this community of place) were enriched and challenged as the emerging book became the centre of a developing collaborative conversation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Pou is a Māori term that has different meanings but here translates as that which keeps a person/people upright: a symbol of support.

  2. 2.

    In this chapter, I assume an interplay of ethics and politics on the assumption that both are always already inseparable while also distinct. The philosopher Dam (2018) suggests related insights on the inseparability yet separateness of love and politics.

  3. 3.

    The Māori term ‘Matua’ is an abbreviated form of Kaumatua and refers to a male Elder.

References

  • Archibald, J. (2008). Indigenous storywork: Educating the heart, mind, body and spirit. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behan, C. (2003). Rescued speech poems: Co-authoring poetry in narrative therapy. Retrieved http://www.narrativeapproaches.com/rescued-speech-poems-co-authoring-poetry-in-narrative-therapy/.

  • Bishop, R. (1996). Collaborative research stories: Whakawhanaungatanga. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1999a). The space of points of view. In P. Bourdieu (Ed.), The weight of the world: Social suffering in contemporary society (P. Parkhurst Ferguson, Trans., pp. 3–5). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1999b). Understanding. In P. Bourdieu (Ed.), The weight of the world: Social suffering in contemporary society (P. Parkhurst Ferguson, Trans., pp. 607–626). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). InterView: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M., Carlson, T. S., & Epston, D. (2017). Miranda returns. Journal of Narrative Family Therapy, 2017(2), 35–46. Retrieved from www.journalnft.com.

  • Castleden, H., Morgan, V. S., & Neimanis, A. (2010). Researchers’ perspectives on collective/community co-authorship in community-based participatory Indigenous research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 5(4), 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruikshank, J. (1998). The social life of stories: Narrative and knowledge in the Yukon Territory. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dam, L. (2018). Love and politics: Rethinking biculturalism and multiculturalism in Aotearoa/New Zealand. In Z. L. Rocha & M. Webber (Eds.), Mana tangatarua: Mixed heritages, ethnic identity and biculturalism in Aotearoa/New Zealand (pp. 135–150). Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denborough, D., & The Preventing Prisoner Rape Project. (2005). Prisoner rape support package. The International Journal of Narrative Therapy and Community Work, 2005(2), 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1997). Performative texts. In W. G. Tierney & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Representation and the text: Re-framing the narrative voice (pp. 179–217). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (2001). The reflexive interview and a performative social science. Qualitative Research, 1, 23–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillard, A. (1989). The writing life. New York, NY: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epston, D. (1999). Co-research: The making of an alternative knowledge. In Dulwich Centre Publications. (Eds.), Narrative therapy and community work: Conference collection (Vol. 1, pp. 137–156). Adelaide, Australia: Dulwich Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epston, D., & White, M. (1992). Experience, contradiction, narrative and imagination. Adelaide, Australia: Dulwich Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1997). Friendship as a way of life. In P. R. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics, subjectivity and truth: Essential works of Michel Foucault 1954–1984 (Vol. 1, pp. 135–140). New York, NY: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. (2010). Letting stories breathe: A socio-narratology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galeano, E. (1992). The book of embraces (C. Belfrage, Trans.). New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, A. R., & Castleden, H. (2008). Community co-authorship in academic publishing: A commentary. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 31(1), 208–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, F., Chilcott, J., & Epston, D. (2007). Glen Innes visioning project: Documenting a tacit community vision. In L. Chile (Ed.), Community development practice in New Zealand: Exploring good practice (pp. 118–141). Auckland, New Zealand: AUT University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, F., (with Chapman, S., Milne, A., Usmar, M., Milne, K., Iorangi, K., & Timoteo, F.). (2015). Ōtara: Where ancient and new technologies meet. Ōtara, Auckland, New Zealand: HTYN Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, F., & Epston, D. (2008). The craft and art of narrative inquiry in organizations. In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.), The Sage handbook of new approaches in management and organization (pp. 485–502). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A., & Jenkins, K. (2011). Words between us/He Kōrero: First Māori-Pākehā conversations on paper. Wellington, New Zealand: Huia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassiter, L. (2005). The Chicago guide to collaborative ethnography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mansvelt, J., & Berg, L. (2010). Writing qualitative geographies, constructing geographical knowledges. In I. Hay (Ed.), Qualitative methods in human geography (3rd ed., pp. 333–355). Ontario, Canada: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly, C. (2010). The paradox of hope: Journeys through a clinical borderland. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, S. (2011). First person plural: Aboriginal storytelling and the ethics of collaborative authorship. Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com.

  • MPEI Contributors, & Hancock, F. (2012). He akoranga he aratohu: Māori and Pacific education initiative. Lessons to guide innovative philanthropic and social practice. Auckland, New Zealand: ASB Community Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, H. L. (2001). Damaged identities, narrative repair. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A. (2010). The social science of biographical life-writing: Some methodological and ethical issues. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(5), 425–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, L. (2016). Decolonizing educational research: From ownership to answerability. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, L. (2005). Fields of play: Constructing an academic life. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sangtin Writers, & Nagar, R. (2006). Playing with fire: Feminist thought and activism through seven lives in India. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). London, United Kingdom: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Te Rōpu Manawanui, & Hancock, F. (2009). Te Rōpu Manuwanui: Tackling diabetes and other health concerns. Wellington, New Zealand: Steele Roberts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welty, E. (1983). One writer’s beginnings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M., & Epston, D. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to the giants and guardians of the HTYN for trusting their stories to me and for our ongoing relationships. I greatly appreciated the advice of Professor Alison Jones, Dr. Te Kawehau Hoskins and Elizabeth Wilkinson. Rose Yukich, Lincoln Dam and Hilary van Uden provided valuable critical comments and editorial expertise. University of Auckland scholarship funding allowed me to present this work to the Storytelling: Global Reflections on Narrative 9th Global Meeting at Oxford University in July 2016.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frances Hancock .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hancock, F. (2019). ‘Who Said This?’ Negotiating the Ethics and Politics of Co-authorship in Community Text-Making. In: Farquhar, S., Fitzpatrick, E. (eds) Innovations in Narrative and Metaphor. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6114-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6114-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6113-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6114-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics