Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Writing Innovative Narratives to Capture the Complexity of Lived Experience: Poetry, Scriptwriting and Prose

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovations in Narrative and Metaphor

Abstract

The task of capturing the lived experiences of individuals, groups, communities and societies is at the forefront of many qualitative methodologies. Yet, creative writing methods in research often demand courage. Courage to disrupt traditional notions of research and courage to give voice to issues that are complex, ambiguous or controversial; courage to be creative and design new methods to respond to tricky research topics and scenarios. However, in collaboration with others, and with recognition that others have gone there before, the emerging researcher is encouraged to (as we say in Aotearoa New Zealand) ‘give it a go’. This chapter explains and explores how two such emerging researchers have employed creative narrative methods to capture the complexity of lived experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackroyd, J., & O’Toole, J. (Eds.). (2010). Performing research: Tensions, triumphs and trade-offs of ethnodrama. Staffordshire, England: Trentham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. J. (2007). Fitting the bill’ for ‘helping them’. A response to ‘Integrated popular theatre approach in Africa’ and ‘Commissioned theatre projects on human rights in Pakistan. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 12(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569780701321203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2010). Quantum entanglements and hauntological relations of inheritance: Dis/continuities, spacetime enfoldings, and justice-to-come. Derrida Today, 3(2), 240–268. https://doi.org/10.3366/E1754850010000813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britzman, D. P. (2000). “The Question of Belief”: Writing poststructural ethnography. In E. St. Pierre & W. S. Pillow (Eds.), Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education (pp. 27–40). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecht, B. (2001). Alienation effects in Chinese acting (J. Willett, Trans.). In J. Willett (Ed.), Brecht on theatre: The development of an aesthetic (2nd ed., pp. 91–99). London, England: Methuen Drama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooker, P. (2007). Key words in Brecht’s theory and practice of theatre. In P. Thomson & G. Sacks (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Brecht (2nd ed., pp. 209–224). Retrieved from http://ebooks.cambridge.org/. https://doi.org/10.1017/ccol0521857090.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Cruz, J. (2012). Engaging performance: Theatre as call and response. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Retrieved from http://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/17670_Chapter1.pdf.

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. W. (1998). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of the mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner, S. (2009). Poetry as method: Reporting research through verse. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, E., & Fitzpatrick, K. (2014). Disturbing the divide: Poetry as improvisation to disorder power relationships in research supervision. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414542692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, K., & Fitzpatrick, E. (2016). “Since feeling is first”: Poetry and research supervision. In R. E. Rinehart & E. Emerald (Eds.), Global south ethnographies: Minding the senses. Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, E. (2016a). It was becoming all too confusing. In J. White (ed.), Permission: The international interdisciplinary impact of Laurel Richardson ( pp. 23–24). Innovations and controversies: Interrogating educational change. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, E. (2016b). The art of letting the ghost come back: A serendipitous tale of exploring the complex issue of becoming a Pākehā educator. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, E. M. (2017). Hauntology and Pākehā: Disrupting the notion of homogeneity. In Z. Rocha & Z. Webber (Eds.), Mana Tangatarua: Mixed heritages, ethnic identity and biculturalism in Aotearoa/New Zealand. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, E., Worrell, F. C., Alansari, M., & Li, A. Y. (2017). Let us dance. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(7), 495–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417718286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, E., Mullen, M., & O’Connor, P. (2015). Creating CRUAT: Disrupting supervision and research through performance. NJ: Drama Australia Journal, 39(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/14452294.2015.1083140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N., & Gordon, L. (1994). A genealogy of dependency: Tracing a keyword of the U.S. welfare state. Signs, 19(2), 309–336. https://doi.org/10.1086/494886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2006). A postcapitalist politics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2008). Diverse economies: Performative practices for ‘other worlds’. Progress in Human Geography, 32(5), 613–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508090821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamera, J. (2011). Performance ethnography. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J., McNamara, C., & Kidd, J. (2011). The usefulness of mess: Artistry, improvisation and decomposition in the practice of research in applied theatre. In B. Kershaw & H. Nicholson (Eds.), Research methods in theatre and performance (pp. 186–209). Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. (2011). Social works: Performing art, supporting publics. Abingdon, England: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lahman, M. K. E., & Richard, V. M. (2014). Appropriated poetry: Archival poetry in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(3), 344–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413489272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P. (2008). Getting lost: Feminist efforts toward a double(d) science. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavy, P. (2010a). A/r/t? A Poetic Montage. Qualitative Inquiry., 12(4), 240–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800409354067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leavy, P. (2010b). Poetic bodies: Female body image, sexual identity and arts-based research. Learning Landscapes, 4(1), 175–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclure, M. (2011). Qualitative inquiry: Where are the ruins? Qualitative Inquiry, 17(10), 997–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C., Berryman, G., Buckland, J., & Champion, W. (2014). “Always in my head”. On Ghost Stories. London, England: The Bakery and the Beehive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, M. (2014). Managing applied theatre: Negotiating tangled webs and navigating murky terrain (unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Auckland, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundrawala, A. (2007). Fitting the bill: Commissioned theatre projects on human rights in Pakistan: The work of Karachi-based group Tehrik e Niswan. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 12(2), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569780701330311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, P. (2009). Unnoticed miracles. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 14(4), 583–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569780903286105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinar, W. F. (2001). The researcher as bricoleur: The teacher as public intellectual. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(6), 696–699. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040100700603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, D. (1998) Performing writing. In P. Phelan & J. Lane (Eds.), The ends of performance (pp. 73–103). New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, M. (2006). Found poetry as literature review: Research poems on audience and performance. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, M. (2015). Poetric Inquiry, 2007–2012: A surrender and catch found poem. Qualitative Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414563806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prentki, T., & Preston, S. (2009). Applied theatre: An introduction. In T. Prentki & S. Preston (Eds.), The applied theatre reader (pp. 9–15). London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, L. (1993). Poetics, dramatics, and transgresive validity: The case of the skipped line. Sociology Quarterly, 34(4), 695–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, L. (1994). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 516–529). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, L. (2001). Getting personal: Writing-stories. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390010007647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, L. (2002). Writing Sociology. Critcal Studies <=> Critical Methodologies, 2, 414–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/153270860200311.

  • Richardson, L., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2005). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 959–978). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. (1993). Culture and imperialism. London, UK: Vintage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saldana, J. (2003). Dramatizing data: A primer. Qualitative Inquiry, 9, 218–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800402250932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoeps, K.-H. (1989). From distancing alienation to intuitive naiveté: Bertolt Brecht’s establishment of a new aesthetic category. Monatshefte, 81(2), 186–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York, NY: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spicer, A., Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2009). Critical performativity: The unfinished business of critical management studies. Human Relations, 62(4), 537–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708101984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spry, T. (2011). Performative autoethnography: Critical embodiements and possibilities. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 497–512). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedlock, B. (2011). Braiding narrative ethnography with memoir and creative nonfiction. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 331–340). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ybema, S., Kamsteeg, F., Yanow, D., & Wels, H. (2009). Studying everyday organizational life. In S. Ybema, D. Yanow, H. Wels, & F. Kamsteeg (Eds.), Organizational Ethnography: Studying the complexities of everyday life (pp. 1–20). London, England: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, K. (1972). Sociology, phenomenology, and surrender-and-catch. Synthese (On the methodological situation in Sociology and other Social Sciences), 24(3/4), 439–471.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    Esther Fitzpatrick & Molly Mullen

Authors
  1. Esther Fitzpatrick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Molly Mullen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esther Fitzpatrick .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education and Social Work, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    Sandy Farquhar

  2. Faculty of Education and Social Work, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    Esther Fitzpatrick

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fitzpatrick, E., Mullen, M. (2019). Writing Innovative Narratives to Capture the Complexity of Lived Experience: Poetry, Scriptwriting and Prose. In: Farquhar, S., Fitzpatrick, E. (eds) Innovations in Narrative and Metaphor. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6114-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6114-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6113-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6114-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation