Abstract
Many of us have been deeply affected by a piece of writing, an image or a performance that helped us reflect on our own or someone else’s experience or encouraged us to look at the world in a different way. The chances are that this trigger was not a traditional factual piece of academic writing. Instead, as Norman Denzin and Laurel Richardson have argued, academic writing has often been characterised as boring and tedious. Since the 1990s, a growing number of researchers have been exploring alternative ways of presenting their findings that are methodologically rigorous, theoretically informed and interesting to engage with. Strongly influenced by postmodernism, there has been a growing efflorescence of what Norman Denzin calls radical experimentations that trample on the traditional boundaries of research representation and dissolve the usual distinctions between academic and creative writing. In this chapter, I explore one alternative form of research textuality, called faction, which attempts to make verifiable and justifiable claims to truth and simultaneously engage readers. Faction, and factionalisation as its method, combines elements of fact and fiction. As a form of academic writing, faction faces challenges because it straddles two forms of writing that are understood as significantly different from each other in their claims to truth and facticity. I address a range of ethical, methodological, disciplinary and creative challenges and pleasures in creating factional texts, as I argue for faction’s value as a legitimate form of research representation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Atkinson, P. (1992). Understanding ethnographic texts. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Barone, T. E. (1992, Spring). Beyond theory and method: A case of critical storytelling. Theory into Practice, XXXI(2), 142–146.
Barone, T. (1995). Persuasive writings, vigilant readings, and reconstructed characters: The paradox of trust in educational storytelling. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(1), 63–74.
Barone, T. (2007). A return to the Gold Standard? Questioning the future of narrative construction as educational research. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(4), 454–470.
Bruce, T. (1998). Postmodernism and the possibilities for writing “vital” sports texts. In G. Rail (Ed.), Sport and postmodern times (pp. 3–20). New York: SUNY Press.
Bruce, T. (2000). Never let the bastards see you cry. Sociology of Sport Journal, 17(1), 69–74.
Bruce, T. (2003). Pass. In J. D. Denison & P. Markula (Eds.), Moving writing: Crafting movement in sport research (pp. 133–150). New York: Peter Lang.
Bruce, T. (2013). (Not) a stadium of four million: Speaking back to dominant discourses of the Rugby World Cup in New Zealand. Sport & Society, 16(7), 899–911.
Bruce, T. (2014a). Battered in the media: The value of theorizing as a method for lessening the pain of lived experience. In R. E. Rinehart, K. N. Barbour, & C. Pope (Eds.), Ethnographic worldviews: Transformations and social justice (pp. 187–203). Netherlands: Springer Press.
Bruce, T. (2014b). A spy in the house of rugby: Living (in) the emotional spaces of nationalism and sport. Emotion, Space and Society, 12, 32–40.
Bruce, T. (2016). Terra ludus: A novel about media, gender and sport. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Bruce, T. (2017). The Rugby World Cup experience: Interrogating the oscillating poles of love and hate. In L. A. Wenner & A. C. Billings (Eds.), Sport, Media and Mega-Events (pp. 100–114). New York: Routledge.
Cole, C. L. (1991). The politics of cultural representation: Visions of field/fields of visions. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 26(1), 36–51.
Denison, J. M. (1996). Sport narratives. Qualitative Inquiry, 2(3), 351–362.
Denison, J. (2006). The way we ran: Reimagining research and the self. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 30(4), 333–339.
Denison, J., & Markula, P. (Eds.). (2003). Moving writing: Crafting movement in sport research. New York: Peter Lang.
Denison, J., & Rinehart, R. (2000). Introduction: Imagining sociological narratives. Sociology of Sport Journal, 17(1), 1–4.
Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive interactionism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Denzin, N. K. (1994). The art and politics of interpretation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 500–515). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Denzin, N. K. (1997). Interpretive ethnography: Ethnographic practices for the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Routledge.
Denzin, N. K. (2009). Qualitative inquiry under fire: Toward a new paradigm dialogue. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Ellis, C. S., & Bochner, A. P. (2006). Analyzing analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 429–449.
Gatewood, J. B. (1984). A short typology of ethnographic genres: Or ways to write about other peoples. Anthropology and Humanism Quarterly, 9(4), 5–10.
Hall, S. (1984). The narrative construction of reality. Southern Review, 17, 2–17.
Hall, S. (Ed.). (1997). Representation: Cultural representation and signifying practices. London: Sage.
Hoffman, A. (2012). Spring). Imagining the real. Rantan, 31(4), 47–64.
Hooks, B. (1990). Yearning: Race, gender, and cultural politics. Boston, MA: South End Press.
Inckle, K. (2010). Telling tales? Using ethnographic fictions to speak embodied ‘truth’. Qualitative Research, 10(1), 27–47.
Markula, P., & Silk, M. (2011). Presentation (and representation). In P. Markula & M. Silk (Eds.), Qualitative research for physical culture (pp. 177–195). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mills, C. W. (1959). On intellectual craftsmanship: Appendix to The Sociological Imagination (pp. 195–226). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Morgan, K. (2013). How to create a faction for a fiction story. Synonym. Retrieved from http://classroom.synonym.com/create-faction-fiction-story-4523.html.
Murray, D. M. (1996, February 27). You don’t know your own story till you write it. The Boston Globe, page number unknown.
Rabbiosi, C., & Vanolo, A. (2017). Are we allowed to use fictional vignettes in cultural geographies? Cultural Geoograhies, 24(2), 265–278.
Richardson, L. (1990). Writing strategies: Reaching diverse audiences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Richardson, L. (1994). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 516–529). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Richardson, L. (1997). Fields of play: Constructing an academic life. New Brunswick, NJ, USA: Rutgers University Press.
Richardson, L. (2000). New writing practices in qualitative research. Sociology of Sport Journal, 17(1), 5–20.
Richardson, L., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2005). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 959–978). Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage.
Sandelowski, M. (1991, Fall). Telling Stories: Narrative approaches in qualitative research. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 23(3), 161–166.
Sparkes, A. C. (1997). Ethnographic fiction and representing the absent other. Sport, Education and Society, 2, 25–40.
Sparkes, A. (2002). Fictional representation: On difference, choice, and risk. Sociology of Sport Journal, 19, 1–24.
Sugden, J., & Tomlinson, A. (2002). Critical sociology of sport: theory and method. In J. Sugden & A. Tomlinson (Eds.), Power Games: A Critical Sociology of Sport (pp. 3–21). London: Routledge.
Tsang, T. (2000). Let me tell you a story: A narrative exploration of identity in high-performance sport. Sociology of Sport Journal, 17, 44–59.
Tsao, E. (2011). Walking the walk: On the epistemological merits of literary ethnography. Anthropology and Humanism, 36(2), 178–192.
Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and emotion: A new social science understanding. London: Sage.
Zander, H. (1999). Fact—Fiction—“Faction”: A study of black South African literature in English. Tubingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bruce, T. (2019). The Case for Faction as a Potent Method for Integrating Fact and Fiction in Research. In: Farquhar, S., Fitzpatrick, E. (eds) Innovations in Narrative and Metaphor. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6114-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6114-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6113-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6114-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)