Abstract
In this chapter, phase doppler anemometer (PDA) and particle image velocimetry (PIV) systems were used to experimentally study the characteristics of liquid jets. The two-dimensional PDA system (Dantec Dynamics, Skovlunde, Denmark) with its transmitting optics and receiving optics was used to measure the droplet diameter and velocity of a transverse liquid jet. Focal lengths were 500 mm for the transmitting optics and 1000 mm for the receiving optics, respectively, and the secondary scattering angle was 35°, as shown schematically in Fig. 7.1. A BSA Flow and Particle Processor, operating with BSA Flow V.5 Software, controlled the PDA system and data acquisition. The droplet velocities varied significantly with the distance from the injector, so the velocity parameters were set individually. The transverse and vertical velocity range was set from −150 to 400 m/s to 100–600 m/s and from −80 to 80 m/s to 0–150 m/s, respectively, considering the effect of the distance from the injector.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baranovsky SI, Schetz JA (1980) Effect of injection angle on liquid injection in supersonic flow. AIAA J 18(6):625–629
Becker J, Hassa C (2002) Breakup and atomization of kerosene jet in crossflow at elevated pressure. At Spray 12(1/2/3):49–67
Bolszo CD, McDonell VG, Gomez GA, Samuelsen GS (2014) Injection of water-in-oil emulsion jets into a subsonic crossflow: an experimental study. At Sprays 24(4):303–348
Capecelatro J, Desjardins O (2013) An Euler-Lagrange strategy for simulating particle-laden flows. J Comput Phys 238(2013):1–31
Chai XC, Mahesh K (2011) Simulations of high speed turbulent jets in crossflow. Paper presented at the 49th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition
Chen T, Smith C, Schommer D, Nejad A (1993) Multi-zone behavior of transverse liquid jet in high-speed flow. Paper presented at the 31st aerospace sciences meeting & exhibit, Reno, NV
Chorda R, Blasco JA, Fueyo N (2002) An efficient particle-locating algorithm for application in arbitrary 2D and 3D grids. Int J Multiph Flows 28(6):1565–1580
Eslamian M, Amighi A, Ashgriz N (2014) Atomization of liquid jet in high-pressure and high-temperature subsonic crossflow. AIAA J 52(7):1374–1385
Fuller RP, Wu PK, Kirkendall KA, Nejad AS (2000) Effects of injection angle on atomization of liquid jets in transverse airflow. AIAA J 38(1):64–72
Ghenai C, Sapmaz H, Lin CX (2009) Penetration heigh correlations for non-aerated and aerated transverse liquid jets in supersonic crossflow. Exp Fluids 46(1):121–129
Gopala Y, Oleksandr B, Lubarsky E, Zinn BT (2009) Liquid jet in crossflow-measurement of the velocity field of the near field continuous medium. Paper presented at the 47th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting
Grossman PM, Schetz JA, Maddalena L (2008) Flush-wall, diamond-shaped fuel injector for high Mach number scramjets. J Propul Power 24(2):259–266
Hewitt P, Schetz JA (2015) Atomization of impinging liquid jets in a supersonic crossflow. AIAA J 21(2):178–179
Im KS, Lin KC, Lai MC, Chon MS (2011) Breakup modeling of a liquid jet in cross flow. Int J Automot Technol 12(4):489–496
Jangi M, Solsjo R, Johansson B, Bai X-S (2015) On large eddy simulation of diesel spray for internal combustion engines. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 53(2015):68–80
Jones WP, Marquis AJ, Vogiatzaki K (2014) Large-eddy simulation of spray combustion in a gas turbine combustor. Combust Flame 161(2014):222–239
Kawai S, Lele SK (2009) Dynamics and mixing of a sonic jet in a supersonic turbulent crossflow. Center for Turbulence Research
Kim Y, Hermanson JC (2012) Breakup and vaporization of droplets under locally supersonic conditions. Phys Fluids 24(7):1–24
Kolpin MA, Horn KP, Reichenbach RE (1968) Study of penetration of a liquid injectant into a supersonic flow. AIAA J 6(5):853–858
Kush EA, Schetz JA (1973) Liquid jet injection into a supersonic flow. AIAA J 11(9):1223–1224
Li C (2013) Structure characteristic of transverse liquid jet in supersonic crossflow. National University of Defense Technology (Chinese)
Li GJ, Dinh TN, Theofanous TG (2004) An experimental study of droplet breakup in supersonic flow: the effect of long-range interactions. Paper presented at the 42nd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit
Li P, Wang Z, Sun M, Wang H (2017) Numerical simulation of the gas-liquid interaction of a liquid jet in supersonic crossflow. Acta Astronaut 134(2017):333–344
Lin KC, Kennedy P, Jackson T (2002a) Penetration heights of liquid jets in high-speed crossflows. Paper presented at the 40th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting & exhibit, AIAA 2002-0873
Lin KC, Kennedy P, Jackson T (2004) Structures of water jets in a Mach 1.94 supersonic crossflow. Paper presented at the 42nd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, Nevada
Lin KC, Ryan M, Carter C, Gruber M, Raffoul C (2010) Raman scattering measurements of gaseous ethylene jets in Mach 2 supersonic crossflow. J Propul Power 26(3):503–513
Maddalena L, Campioli TL, Schetz JA (2006) Experimental and computational investigation of light-gas injectors in Mach 4.0 crossflow. J Propul Power 22(5):1027–1038
Mashayek A, Jafari A, Ashgriz N (2008) Improved model for the penetration of liquid jets in subsonic crossflows. AIAA J 46(11):2674–2686
Mashayek A, Behzad M, Ashgriz N (2011) Multiple injector model for primary breakup of a liquid jet in crossflow. AIAA J 49(11):2407–2420
Masutti D, Bernhardt S, Asma CO, Vetrano MR (2009) Experimental characterization of liquid jet atomization in Mach 6 crossflow. Paper presented at the 39th AIAA fluid dynamics conference, San Antonio, Texas
Nejad AS, Schetz JA (1983) Effects of viscosity and surface tension on a jet plume in supersonic crossflow. AIAA J 22(4):458–459
O’Rourke PJ, Amsden AA (1987) The Tab method for numerical calculation of spray droplet breakup. Paper presented at the international fuels and lubricants meeting and exposition
Perurena JB, Asma CO, Theunissen R, Chazot O (2009) Experimental investigation of liquid jet injection into Mach 6 hypersonic crossflow. Exp Fluids 46(3):403–417
Pilch M, Erdman CA (1987) Use of breakup time data and velocity history data to predict the maximum size of stable fragments for acceleration-induced breakup of a liquid drop. Int J Multiph Flow 13:741–757
Ragucci R, Picarelli A, Sorrentino G, Martino Pd (2009) Validation of droplets behavior model by means of PIV measurements in a cross-flow atomizing system. Paper presented at the 32nd meeting on combustion in Italian Section of the Combustion Institute
Sallam KA, Aalburg C, Faeth GM (2004) Breakup of round nonturbulent liquid jets in gaseous crossflow. AIAA J 42(12):2529–2540
Sallam KA, Ng C L, Sankarakrishnan R (2006) Breakup of turbulent and non-turbulent liquid jets in gaseous crossflows. Paper presented at the 44th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, Nevada
Schetz JA, Maddalena L, Burger SK (2010) Molecular weight and shock-wave effects on transverse injection in supersonic flow. J Propul Power 26(5):1102–1113
Shams E, Finn J, Apte SV (2010) A numerical scheme for Euler-Lagrange simulation of bubbly flows in complex systems. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 1:1–41
Tanner FX, Weisser G (1998) Simulation of liquid jet atomization for fuel sprays by means of a cascade drop breakup model. Paper presented at the international congress and exposition
Theofanous TG, Li GJ, Dinh TN, Chang C-H (2007) Aerobreakup in disturbed subsonic and supersonic flow fields. J Fluid Mech 593(2007):131–170
Tong Y (2012) Breakup process and injection characteristic of transverse liquid jet in crossflow. National University of Defense Technology (Chinese)
Tong Y (2014) Experimental investigation on injection characteristics of assembled transverse injectors in supersonic crossflow. J Natl Univ Def Technol 36(2):73–80
Trinh HP, Chen CP, Balasubramanyam MS (2007) Numerical simulation of liquid jet atomization including turbulence effects. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 129:920–928
Tsuji Y, Morikawa Y, Tanaka T (1987) Numerical simulation of gas-liquid two-phase flow in a two-dimensional horizontal channel. Int J Multiph Flow 13(5):671–684
Wang Z, Wu L, Li Q, Li C (2014) Experimental investigation on structures and velocity of liquid jets in a supersonic crossflow. Appl Phys Lett 105(13):4
Wu L (2016) Breakup and atomization mechanism of liquid jet in supersonic crossflows. National University of Defense Technology (Chinese)
Wu PK, Kirkendall KA, Fuller RP (1997) Breakup processes of liquid jets in subsonic crossflows. J Propul Power 13(1):64–73
Wu L, Wang Z, Li Q, Zhang J (2015) Investigations on the droplet distributions in the atomization of kerosene jets in supersonic crossflows. Appl Phys Lett 107(10):104103
Wu L, Wang Z, Li Q, Li C (2016) Study on transient structure characteristics of round liquid jet in supersonic crossflows. J Vis, 1–5
Wu L, Chang Y, Zhang K, Li Q, Li C (2017) Model for three-dimensional distribution of liquid fuel in supersonic crossflows. Paper presented at the 21st AIAA international space planes and hypersonic systems and technologies conference, Xiamen, China
Zhao YH, Liang JH, Zhao YX (2016) Non-reacting flow visualization of supersonic combustor based on cavity and cavity-strut flameholder. Acta Astronaut 121(2016):282–291
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sun, M., Wang, H., Xiao, F. (2019). Spray Characteristics of a Liquid Jet in a Supersonic Crossflow. In: Jet in Supersonic Crossflow. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6025-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6025-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6024-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6025-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)