Abstract
The efficient delivery of gaseous fuel into supersonic airflow is very important in high-speed air-breathing engines, which require sufficient fuel–air mixing in the extremely short residence time within the engine combustor. The characteristics of the injected fuel plume, such as the penetration height, spanwise distribution, and concentration profiles, play an important role in ignition, flame holding, flame spreading, and combustion efficiency for a given flow path. In recent years, more and more experimental measurement technologies have been used to investigate the sonic jet in supersonic crossflow, which are given in Sect. 2.1. Jet penetration of sonic gaseous jet is discussed in Sect. 2.2. Spanwise distribution of gaseous jet and trajectory are summarized in Sect. 2.3. Moreover, near-wall information of sonic gaseous jet in supersonic crossflow is described in Sect. 2.4. Because numerical simulations of sonic jet in supersonic crossflow about penetration height, transverse distribution, and concentration profiles are usually compared with experimental results to prove the reliability of numerical simulations. (Or though numerical simulations can reproduce the detailed jet flowfield, the calculated results of penetration height, transverse distribution, and concentration profiles, however, lack the enough reliability.) Thus, we only discuss experimental research in this chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ben-Yakar A, Hanson R (2002) Ultra-fast-framing schlieren system for studies of the time evolution of jets in supersonic crossflows. Exp Fluids 32(6):652–666
Benyakar A, Mungal MG, Hanson RK (2006) Time evolution and mixing characteristics of hydrogen and ethylene transverse jets in supersonic crossflows. Phys Fluids 18(2):1105–1154
Bergmann V, Meier W, Wolff D, Stricker W (1998) Application of spontaneous Raman and Rayleigh scattering and 2D LIF for the characterization of a turbulent CH4/H2/N2 jet diffusion flame. Appl Phys B 66(4):489–502
Billig F, Schetz J (2013) Analysis of penetration and mixing of gas jets in supersonic cross flow. In: Aiaa Materials Specialist Conference-coating Technology for Aerospace Systems, 2013
Billig FS, Schetz JA (2015) Penetration of gaseous jets injected in supersonic stream. Journal of Spacecraft & Rockets 3(11):1658–1665
Billig FS, Orth RC, Lasky M (1971) A Unified Analysis of Gaseous Jet Penetration. Aiaa Journal 9(6):1048–1058
Bo W, Liu W, Zhao Y, Fan X, Chao W (2012) Experimental investigation of the micro-ramp based shock wave and turbulent boundary layer interaction control. Phys Fluids 24(5):1166–1175
Boguszko M, Elliott GS (2005) On the use of filtered Rayleigh scattering for measurements in compressible flows and thermal fields. Exp Fluids 38(1):33–49
Elliott G, Glumac N, Carter C (2015) Molecular Filtered Rayleigh Scattering applied to combustion and turbulence. In: Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 2015
Falco RE, Chu CC (1988) Measurement of two-dimensional fluid dynamic quantities using a photochromic grid tracing technique. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering 814:706–710
Forkey JN, Lempert WR, Miles RB (1998) Accuracy limits for planar measurements of flow field velocity, temperature and pressure using Filtered Rayleigh Scattering. Exp Fluids 24(2):151–162
Gruber MR, Nejad AS, Chen TH, Dutton JC (1997) Compressibility effects in supersonic transverse injection flowfields. Phys Fluids 9(5):1448–1461
Haertig J, Havermann M, Rey C, George A (2002) Particle image velocimetry in mach 3.5 and 4.5 shock-tunnel flows. AIAA J 40(6):1056–1060
Hasselbrink EF, Mungal MG (2001) Transverse jets and jet flames. Part 2. Velocity and OH field imaging. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 443(443):27–68
Hawkins PF, Lehman H, Schetz JA (2012) Structure of highly underexpanded transverse jets in a supersonic stream. Aiaa Journal 5(5):882–884
Heister SD, Karagozian AR (1990) Vortex modeling of gaseous jets in a compressible crossflow. 6(1):85–92
Herring GC, Hillard JME (2000) Flow Visualization by Elastic Light Scattering in the Boundary Layer of a Supersonic Flow
Khalitov DA, Longmire EK (2002) Simultaneous two-phase PIV by two-parameter phase discrimination. Exp Fluids 32(2):252–268
Liang CH, Sun MB, Liu Y, Yang YX (2018) Shock wave structures in the wake of sonic transverse jet in supersonic crossflow. Acta Astronaut 148:12–21
Lin KC, Ryan M, Carter C, Gruber M, Raffoul C (2014) Raman Scattering Measurements of Gaseous Ethylene Jets in a Mach 2 Supersonic Crossflow. 26(3):503–513
Liu Y, Sun MB, Liang CH, Cai Z, Wang YN (2018) Structures of near-wall wakes subjected to a sonic jet in a supersonic crossflow. Acta Astronaut
Mahesh K (2013) The Interaction of Jets with Crossflow. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 45(3):379–407
Mcdaniel JC, Raves J (1986) Laser-induced-fluorescence visualization of transverse gaseous injection in a nonreacting supersonic combustor. J Propul Power 4(6):591–597
Meyer TR, King GF, Martin GC, Lucht RP, Schauer FR, Dutton JC (2002) Accuracy and resolution issues in NO/acetone PLIF measurements of gas-phase molecular mixing. Exp Fluids 32(6):603–611
Meyers JF (1992) Doppler Global Velocimetry - The Next Generation? AIAA 17 th Aerospace Ground Testing Conference, paper AIAA-92-3897. In: Aiaa 17 Th Aerospace Ground Testing Conference, 1992
Papamoschou D, Hubbard DG (1993) Visual observations of supersonic transverse jets. Exp Fluids 14(6):468–476
Portz R, Segal C (2006) Penetration of Gaseous Jets In Supersonic Flows. Aiaa Journal 44(10):2426–2429
Rogers RC (1971) A study of the mixing of hydrogen injected normal to a supersonic airstream, NASA technical note D–6114
Rothstein A , Wantuck P (1992, April) A study of the normal injection of hydrogen into a heated supersonicflow using planar laser-induced fluorescence. In 28th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit (p. 3423)
Spaid FW, Zukoski E (1964) Secondary injection of gases in supersonic flow. In, 1964. pp 1689–1696
Squire LC (2006) The motion of a thin oil sheet under the steady boundary layer on a body. J Fluid Mech 11(2):161–179. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112061000445
Stanislas M, Okamoto K, Kähler CJ, Westerweel J (2005) Main results of the Second International PIV Challenge. Exp Fluids 39(2):170–191
Stier B, Koochesfahani MM (1999) Molecular Tagging Velocimetry (MTV) measurements in gas phase flows. Exp Fluids 26(4):297–304
Sun M, Zhang S, Zhao Y, Zhao Y, Liang J (2013) Experimental investigation on transverse jet penetration in supersonic turbulent crossflow. Science China Technological Sciences 56(8):1989–1998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-013-5265-7
Teets RE (1984) Accurate convolutions of coherent anti-Stokes Raman spectra. Opt Lett 9(6):226–228
Torrez SM (2012) Design Refinement and Modeling Methods for Highly-Integrated Hypersonic Vehicles. Dissertations & Theses - Gradworks
Watson KA, Lyons KM, Donbar JM, Carter CD (2000) Simultaneous Rayleigh imaging and CH-PLIF measurements in a lifted jet diffusion flame. Combust Flame 123(1):252–265
Yang YX, Wang ZG, Sun MB, Wang HB (2015) Empirical mixing model of transverse gaseous jet in supersonic jet in supersonic flow. journal of Aerospace Power 30(1392–1399
Zhao YX, Yi SH, Tian LF, Cheng ZY (2009) Supersonic flow imaging via nanoparticles. Sci China Ser E-Tech Sci 52(12):3640–3648
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sun, M., Wang, H., Xiao, F. (2019). Spatial Distribution of Gaseous Jet in Supersonic Crossflow. In: Jet in Supersonic Crossflow. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6025-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6025-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6024-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6025-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)